My mum was born in the early 50s, her mother was born in the early 20s - then it gets a bit crazy; her father was born in 1874 and his father was born in 1820.
My mums grandfather (my great grandfather) born 1874 had a lot of siblings but only two survived childhood. One was younger and left for Liverpool and had children when she 20 (in about 1900). His older brother who took on the family farm had children in the 1890s.
It tends to be 25 to 30 on average per generation so this has led to some weird results on my mum's DNA matches (it makes it harder to track how matches fit into her tree as the generations are effectively out). She gets weird results like 2nd cousin 4 times removed which are really confusing to work out how they are related to her.
My mum's aunt born 1935 is still alive - her grandfather was born in 1820. This totally messes with my head as a concept!
You would expect a generation at
1820 - (my family 1820)
1850 - (my family 1874 - oldest sibling 1865, youngest 1880)
1880 - (oldest daughter born 1914 - youngest daughter born 1935! Oldest first cousin 1895)
1910 - (child of youngest daughter 1965. Oldest second cousin 1915)
So you can the generations slipped about 55 years from expectations at one point. My mum's great grandfather was born over 130 years before her! I've not seen many families where this gap is so large tbh.
But apparently this isn't that unusual for Irish ancestry. I was really surprised to find this out. What happened was due to the famine many men born around 1820 delayed marrying and starting a family until they had land - this was often after their parents had died or they'd emigrated and started out from scratch. There was a real fear of repeat and they wanted to ensure they had the ability to support their family. So you get a lot of 50 year old men marrying women around their mid 20s or so - and that's exactly what happened in my Mum's family. My great grandfather first went to the US, then Europe before moving to the UK for work.