I saw it tonight, I was looking forward to it but ended up disappointed. It was too long and slow, I felt bored really. The atmosphere and cinematography were good and I liked the beginning and the end...
I also usually like Bill Skarsgard, but he was OTT in this! Too much with the prosthetics (unrecognisable as a pp said) and that voice, he was barely understandable. The director should have told him to tone it down. I think it was misjudged because he is very evidently an inhuman monster from the moment the Nicholas Hoult character meets him (and is understandably terrified). He is supposed to seem plausible as just an eccentric nobleman who wants to do a property deal, at first, isn't he?
Also, the Count travels by sea from Transylvania to Germany, what? Wouldn't this involve circumnavigating round the whole of Europe, going round Italy and Spain and the Med, up past France etc?
Of course he has to arrive by ship as it fits the plot (the plague rats etc) and of course in the original Dracula, (which Nosferatu rips off) he arrives by sea to the coast of England (Whitby).
Another thing that I think they got wrong in tone was when the wife Ellen back home was having fits and convulsions, she was manhandled in her nightgown/corsets by her husband's male friend. A gentleman of that era just wouldn't have behaved like that with an unrelated lady, it would have been thought completely inappropriate and unseemly. If she was uncontrollable then either the wife or maids would have dealt with it, or medical people would have been brought in.
I suppose I am comparing it to the 1990s 'Bram Stoker's Dracula' with Gary Oldman, Winona Ryder etc. I still love that. It had the same brooding atmosphere, lots of creepy horror, characters you cared about more, added romance and pathos and just more sparkle. Also a great score with the beautiful 'Love Song for a Vampire' by Annie Lennox.