Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Films

Peter rabbit

80 replies

allthegoodnameshadgone · 17/03/2018 20:20

I saw this today and I thought it was great. I even had a little cry in parts. Anyone else seen it yet?

OP posts:
juneau · 05/04/2018 18:13

Peter Rabbit should be a U aimed at DC aged 3-9 IMO, not a PG, which is aimed at DC who are up to 12. My 10-year-old was bored (and outgrew PR years ago - the only reason he was there was because his 6-year-old DB wanted to see it).

The whole thing was just wrong on so many levels.

And all the psycho-babble, etc, ugh! Horrible. The whole thing was so awful I've had to pour myself a drink Grin

Ihatebuildabear · 05/04/2018 18:14

My 10 year old loved it too. Tbh we had really low expectations and just enjoyed the silliness of it.

IamMoana · 05/04/2018 18:42

My 3 year old loved it. Completely agree at the home alone comparison! My favourite recent film would have to be CoCo, wept for days after it.

MrsJamin · 05/04/2018 20:09

Went to see it with DSs aged 8 & 10. They seemed to really like it. I was a bit bored. Really annoyed by the weird accents, eg the men in the shop were actually Australian! The ambulance was Australian. It just didn't feel British, let alone set in Cumbria. Rose Byrne was rubbish. It felt too violent to be aimed at young children yet there were loads of families in the cinema that included some really young children. I wish we'd have seen wrinkle in time or ready player one. It was a triumph of marketing, the reason why we ended up seeing Peter Rabbit. Hmmph. £24 for three of us. I'd like a refund!

Ihatebuildabear · 05/04/2018 20:24

The violence was just silly though. Like a cartoon. Kids love that stuff!

TheClitterati · 05/04/2018 20:30

My 6yo, 10yo both loved it. I found myself laughing out loud several times too. Grin

TheClitterati · 05/04/2018 20:35

It was very slapstick which I wasn't expecting. I was thinking I'd be bored out of my brains (not a big fan of the books). But the comedy aspect perked it up.

DontFuckingSayIt · 05/04/2018 20:46

I saw it at the weekend and have to say I did enjoy it ( compared with some of the films I've seen with DD). It was a bit more "grown up" than I expected it to be but this was quite good for us as DD is a quite mature 5.

There was a scene which stood out badly for me, in which Bea finds out her boyfriend is trying to hurt the rabbits, and in her upset she slaps him across the shoulder/arm - I immediately thought how they would never have shown that had it been the other way around, especially in a childrens film.

But otherwise, I found it entertaining enough.

Tartanwallpaper · 05/04/2018 20:59

Wallis Frizz - I know which you mean and I wasn't impressed explaining it to my children. So far I've told them some men marry men and some women marry women and its not an issue - this trailer seemed to present homosexuality as being really deviant and almost unheard of. Not a view I want putting in my kids heads because they were too young to understand the subtext!

Ihatebuildabear · 05/04/2018 21:02

Yes. That trailer. Bizarre!!

drspouse · 05/04/2018 21:10

I took DS, his friend and DD yesterday. DD is 3 and needed the loo 5 times so I missed a few plot points Hmm but it was funny.
Especially the cockerel.
I didn't get the outrage about the allergy scene, it's not as wrong to try and kill someone by electrocuting them as by feeding them something they are allergic to?

WallisFrizz · 05/04/2018 21:11

I loved the cockerel!

PrivateParkin · 05/04/2018 21:21

I thought it was dire. I'm no fan of traditional Peter Rabbit either, to be fair. But the storyline was he was basically trying to kill Mr McGregor?! (And vice versa) I think there was a review that said it was like In Betweeners type humour, and it totally was. But with weird animals. That scene where all the animals had taken over the house made me feel sick!

raisedbyguineapigs · 06/04/2018 17:38

drspouse I think the outrage with the allergy scene is that obviously electrocuting someone is going to be bad, but children are unlikely to be able to get hold of an electrified fence. With the allergy scene, Peter mocked the blackberry allergy a bit earlier on, while basically minimising food allergies in general, and then they tried to kill him with the thing he was allergic to. Lots of children will be going to school with food allergies and many more children will be going to school with children with allergies to common ingredients.

TeisanLap · 07/04/2018 17:30

I took my 6 grandchildren of various ages to see it. We all loved it but James Cordens voice didn't quite match the look of Peter Rabbit.

ShowerGel9 · 07/04/2018 17:50

'Peter Rabbit, Peter Rabbit....let's go!'

Easter GrinSorry. Had to get that little tune off my chest Easter Grin

MinnieMousse · 07/04/2018 18:00

It was much better than I thought it would be. My 5 and 8 year olds really enjoyed it. I don't like JC normally but he wasn't too annoying in this.

enpointeredshoes · 11/04/2018 20:53

I thought it was awful.

enpointeredshoes · 11/04/2018 21:00

*The whole thing was just wrong on so many levels.

And all the psycho-babble, etc, ugh! Horrible. The whole thing was so awful I've had to pour myself a drink grin*

Grin You speak the truth juneau! I hadn't seen the trailers and was expecting a lovely gentle scenic trip through the Lakes...

TeisanLap · 12/04/2018 03:25

grin You speak the truth juneau! I hadn't seen the trailers and was expecting a lovely gentle scenic trip through the Lakes...

So was I but I got over my surprise pretty quickly and went on to enjoy it for what it was.

Lindy2 · 12/04/2018 03:49

I really enjoyed it. There were quite a few laugh out loud bits for me. My 7 and 9 year old liked it too. It's slapstick fun with some great one liners.
I much preferred it to Coco which I thought was a bit weird and creepy.

LiviaWithGarfield · 12/04/2018 04:17

It was really shit and our whole family 2 dc gp dh and i hated it. aggressive and violent, non story.. Waste of money and totally dull.

KIiiiiilllllll that rabbit. -and lie about it-- nice.

TheDowagerCuntess · 12/04/2018 04:48

I think they probably wanted it to appeal to a wider audience than ... just three year olds. What with wanting to make money from it, 'n all.

The 'violence' was slapstick, along the lines of The Roadrunner, Tweety & Sylvester, Tom & Jerry, etc. All of which are aimed at young kids.

I found the young Mr McGregor unbearably wet, and was disappointed by the total lack of chemistry between him and Bea. Other than that, it was fun.

I did think it was Ricky Jervais voicing Peter initially. Didn't realise how similar he and James Cordon sound.

My 7 and 9YOs really enjoyed it.

PanannyPanoo · 12/04/2018 07:15

The 'Violence' was realistic computer generated real film. Not cartoon slapstick.
It looked real to me. Though I know it wasn't.

It looked real to my 3 children aged 3-8. They thought it was.

Slapstick is slipping on a banana skin and hurting your bottom dramatically. Not dropping dead from a heart attack or causing electrocution.

One cried when Mr McGregor dropped dead. Our friend and neighbour has recently died. But many children know people who have died.
I don't think we had to see he die.
My anaphylactic child sobbed uncontrollably and I had to take her out of the cinema in the epi pen scene. For a child who knows what it feels like, to know the terror of not being able to breathe and need hospitalision it was a torturous scene. With no place in a child's film.

To those who don't know what it feels like, to diminish the real threat of death and make it funny is totally unacceptable. To mock and belittle life threatening allergies is wrong.

My 8 year old was disturbed by the electrocution scenes.

I thought the film was horrible. Humour aimed at adults. Totally missed the point of being a child's film.

The books are pretty horrific, the cartoon is questionable though my children love it, theft, bullying etc.
I was expecting a story line more like the cartoon than Home Alone type humour.

Films like Toy Story, Monsters inc etc appeal to a massive audience without being so brutal.

LiviaWithGarfield · 12/04/2018 07:42

"I thought the film was horrible. Humour aimed at adults. Totally missed the point of being a child's film."

Yes, this is exactly how I saw it. But many people are incredibly desensitised and don't 'read' movies and their meaning and potential emotional impressions.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.