Do men have an innate sense of importance?

Someone posted this checklist - which might be helpful for visibility of what people do at home: vardgivare.skane.se/siteassets/3.-kompetens-och-utveckling/projekt-och-utveckling/jamstallt-foraldraskap/material-foraldrar/checklist-for-gender-equality-in-your-everyday-life.pdf

I don't think it is surprising that men end up thinking their work is more important. It wasn't that long ago that most women stayed home to look after the home and DC, and the men worked. I don't think society has moved on from that yet mentally. I have a very equal set up with DH, and it comes up over and over again that people assume that the domestic roles are down to me. We have a cleaner, and I have been told so many times that I'm lazy and should be doing it myself. Not DH, who works half the hours I do!

I also had similar issues to you OP when DH went part time, but the mental load remained with me. I'd be at work, texting him to make sure DC had everything they needed for school, or remembered appointments. We had several conversations about it, and it did eventually improve, but the default was definitely that it was my responsibility despite me working twice the hours.

I don't think it's innate, it's social conditioning/nurture.

This.
And they can be conditioned out of it but it does need challenging.

We were in a situation where our school drop off/pick up plan was solely dictated by his work schedule which made it quite challenging for me. I pointed this out and once he could see what was happening he made efforts to change .... he didn't even realise he was doing it so it wasn't malicious. It didn't help that he was surrounded by people at work who did have someone else doing all the childcare.

The fact your DH did step up when was a SAHD but changed when he went back to work would suggest it's social conditioning not an innate quality.

Great checklist @Namenic

@Icecreamistoocold

It might be comfortable to go with the innate explanation, lots of people do, to explain why society appears to supports his view

I honestly think it's more accurately explained by the rule of 'worth a try'. If you act as if you are 'too important' or whatever for the grunt tasks and someone else picks them up, you are pretty much winning at life, making it worth a try.

Sincerely hope you can have the conversation about pulling once weight or earning one's oxygen rights.

Since you would then be swimming against the tide of societies expectation, you would need to resign yourself to a good stretch of remaining alert and continuing to point out the inequality.

I very much hope you remain vigilant but understand that you may prefer to retire more comfortably below the parapet and 'accept' it's how it is.

It happened to me, now DH is genuinely too old and infirm to pull his weight. Sigh.

My DH always thinks anything he's doing is more important than anything I'm doing. If he applies his brain to the question, he can see it's not necessarily true. But that's his baseline assumption.

And I've seen this over and over again with friends' male partners. They think what they want to do is far more urgent and important, even when it's clearly completely unrealistic, like spending years building a recording studio no one ever uses.

Men are definitely conditioned to think their work is an integral part of who they are, and that's the reason why they are so defensive of their jobs and why so few men are SAHD. Men who don't have a job are looked down on by many people, including women. And women are conditioned to accept this set up and to believe that their own jobs are "optional" - something they are likely to give up, or no longer consider important, when they have children. It's something I've seen in so many relationships around me, where the DH's job is so important he couldn't possibly be at home before 7pm, and the wife accepts it as a given.
Having said that, I do wonder if the OP's DH doesn't simply think it's "his turn" now? Perhaps he is so happy to be back at work he's kind of forgotten about housework... Trying to give him the benefit of the doubt here!

Yes, this is the patriarchy.
Even more illuminating when you see it in action with a generally decent bloke who knows what it's like to be a SAHP.

I think you're right OP and after. I've always been the higher earner, but when I went back to work following my mat leave, it was always me that has to leave work of dc were ill etc, my dh would always push back and act like his job was more 'important'

Let's give 'em the benefit of the doubt and suggest its unconscious but otherwise, I'd say absolutely. @Icecreamistoocold

My DH is as nice a bloke as you could find, has been the primary caregiver for his older kids, still expects me to be the default parent for DD. Has probably never booked a haircut or dental appointment for his older kids either. Female = primary responsibility for children. Not just kids either, when my MIL was temporarily staying with us while a care home place became available, he did a lot, but somehow, getting Mum dressed and sorting out commodes and such like was something he couldn't cope with. She didn't like him doing it either.
I don't think this is unusual in my experience.
Why do women put up with it? I guess there's many reasons. Partly our own social conditioning.

What about imposter syndrome? After quite a few arguments it came out that my dh always prioritises his work because deep down he feels insecure in his abilities (he's pretty senior and always gets good feedback) and is worried about what will happen if he "fails". Don't know if that sound like your dh but if he's been out if the workplace a long time then maybe he does feel a pressure to prove himself and you do lose confidence after many years as a SAHP

It's interesting (or sad, pathetic, mean) how men will allow women to take on the lion's share. It's a rare man who will say, hang on, things aren't fair here.

It's not in their interests to lose power. And they know that.

I knew someone who'd worked for a charity in rural Nepal. The men felt that their work was much harder and more important than the women's work. The charity workers sat down with them and wrote down what the men did and what the women did. It became apparent to everybody that in fact the women did most of the work, while the men pretty much lazed around.

No, it’s not innate.

It’s a constant drip-drip of socialisation that begins as soon as young people (children) start to become aware of the world around them.

Something happens that’s ostensibly ‘good’ but actually undermines women’s position, while reinforcing men’s ‘superiority’.

I have a tween and a young teen, and I’ve been noticing this for a while.

For example, in 2016 - ‘USA on the verge of electing first female president!’

Again in 2016, ‘Theresa May is Britain’s second PM!’

Pride in my home country that we were the first country to give women the vote.

Etc. Etc….

These are all good things. But every time I hear/read one of these ‘good news’ stories, I worry about what my DS is hearing and taking away about that.

It’s 2023, and the USA has never had a woman president? Why? Are they not up to the job? What’s wrong with women, that they can’t get the gig?

The UK has only had 2 female PMs, compared with XXX male ones? Why? Again, are women that incompetent?

Women got the vote much later than men? Why? They’re clearly not as good as men.

I am literally touching the absolute tip of the iceberg here. But this sort of thing is so widespread.

Men are constantly told/shown they rule they world. The women who manage to rise to the top, are the exceptions that prove the rule - which is: women aren’t up to the job. And when the self-styled ‘leader of the free world’ (AKA the USA) hasn’t even managed it at all, there’s obviously something really sub-standard about women. And then they’re ousted due to unrelenting misogynistic attacks (see: Jacinda Adern).

This is the drip-drip message that young people get.

And then the ‘Matthew Effect’ (the rich get richer and the poor get poorer) kicks in, and men coast along on their own self-importance, while women are constantly relegated to second best.

@ComfortablyDazed 3 female PMs

I work in a male dominated workplace and fo a sport which the majority is male. I do a lot of listening ☹️. Most of it self indulgent hot air.

If I am speaking or recounting a tale I will get spoken over by a man who just has to be heard. They do not even realise they are doing it.

So you really got the point I was making.

Yes I do believe men (NAMALT, some, most) have a more selfish streak. Is this down to innate biology and the extra testosterone, or is social conditioning, or both?

If something needed to be done, I know I would always have to wait for my husband to finish what he was doing first, wheras I would interrupt my own task. Maybe I should have been more like him.

Added into the fact I believe men generally are more competitive amongst each other, and have more face to lose.

As already said, it could be that after years of being a good STAHD, he feels it’s now his turn. It might be that his natural masculine traits have come to the fore and his chance to shine/prove himself have carried him on a bit of an ego trip. I don’t mean this in a nasty way, but it’s a natural consequence. It could happen to a mother who suddenly starts working, but I believe some/many/most women, like you would stop and check what is fair.

It may be as time progresses, things go back to normal with shared work.

But I get your point, you thought your husband wasn’t like this, and then you find he is, so hence your question.

He has neglected his career for 10 years (as many women do) and is now prioritising it (as many women do when they return to work).
So he's slacking in the domestic chores department unsurprisingly and you've picked him up on it and he's responded positively.
A happy ending all round.

I agree with this, people assume they are important if those around them/ society treat them as important. You can see all kinds of examples of this, gender is one of them.