Mumsnet Logo
My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Feminism: chat

Has Keir Starmer backtracked?

41 replies

Tillsforthrills · 13/04/2022 19:50

Apologies if this has been posted.


“Sir Keir Starmer has said it is “plain common sense” that biology determines sex for the majority of women but that those who struggle with their gender identity should be respected”

Is this him back tracking due to the backlash?

OP posts:
Report

OceanAtTheEnd · 13/04/2022 19:58

It doesn't sound like much of a backtrack to me - of course they should be respected. But what does it actually mean at the intersection of their rights with those of women and girls?

Report

ABitBesottedWithMyDog · 13/04/2022 20:00

What he said is gibberish.

Report

ChiefInspectorParker · 13/04/2022 20:01

This reply has been withdrawn

Message from MNHQ: This post has been withdrawn

mocktail · 13/04/2022 20:03

So biology determines sex unless it doesn't? Hmm

Report

Chrysanthemum5 · 13/04/2022 20:04

Nope it's just gibberish and he's going to have to be a lot clearer if he wants to be taken seriously on this

Report

mocktail · 13/04/2022 20:04

He seems to be trying to paraphrase what Boris said the other day, which generally seemed to go down better than what Labour have come up with so far.

Report

HeDidWhattt · 13/04/2022 20:05

Majority????

Really!

His such an idiot it hurts.

Report

Pixiedust1234 · 13/04/2022 20:08

Backtracked on what exactly? He still hasn't said that men can never be a biological woman. Or that biological raping males should not be in womens prisons. Or that men pretending to be women shouldn't be in womens changing rooms.

So what has he actually said?

Report

Tillsforthrills · 13/04/2022 20:22

@Pixiedust1234

Yes I’m trying to figure out if it is or isn’t backtracking.

Although he hasn’t said men can’t be women, his first statement seemed categorically in favour of trans women’s rights over biological women’s rights.

This time he’s saying it’s common sense that biology decides sex in the ‘majority’ of cases. Confusing!

OP posts:
Report

HermioneWeasley · 13/04/2022 20:26

If the “majority” of women are determined by their biology, that implies a “minority” of women whose womanhood isn’t determined by their sex, ie:male women. He still believes there are male women who are women and entitled to our sex based rights. It’s the same position as he’s always held - there should be no place these males can’t go.

He can fuck off.

Report

Whatiswrongwithmyknee · 13/04/2022 20:33

It's quite simple really. He doesn't understand biology. He doesn't care about women. He thinks the electorate are too stupid to see through his nonsense.

He's given people permission to identify their way into wherever they want and he doesn't give a shit about the consequences.

Lovely.

Report

DoubleYouOhEmAyEn · 13/04/2022 20:54

I think he might think he's backtracked a little but actually he's shown himself to be lacking. Again.

Report

Moppincraxy · 13/04/2022 20:56

He's saying most women don't have penises but some do...

Report

MarshaBradyo · 13/04/2022 20:57

No it’s still gibberish without clarity

Just trying to dress it up a bit better

Report

A580Hojas · 13/04/2022 21:01

He has, sort of. Perhaps enough of us who care about this issue have put it right under the noses of our Labour party candidates and asked wtf. I emailed my female Labour MP and told her I wouldn't be voting Labour at the next GE and linked many Mumsnet threads in the email. Perhaps he finally FINALLY got wind of women's unrest.

It's not enough for me to change my mind though.

Report

TeiTetua · 14/04/2022 19:21

It's a pathetic attempt to offer something to women without alienating the trans mob. He wants to say something and nothing at the same time.

He wants to "respect trans people" but when the decision has to be made, give them access to single-sex spaces or tell them to stay out, then he's going to keep his head down and try to stay out of the fight. If that means the woke side drives anyone else out of the party, along with lots of voters, then so be it.

Report

Whatiswrongwithmyknee · 14/04/2022 19:49

Absolutely. That kind of inability to state your position is not what we need in an opposition leader.

Report

Genevieva · 14/04/2022 23:06

He is trying to have his a cake and eat it. He has lost my vote unless he can make the very simple statement that women are adult female humans. The word woman is defined by biological sex.

Report

MangyInseam · 15/04/2022 02:08

One possibility is that he is just trying to have it both ways - appeasing those on both sides of the issue.

It's also possible that he is thinking of those who hold a GRC as being women and so he i saying that for most women it's a biological category and for a few a legal fiction. As a lawyer he may well be disposed to think of that as "real".

But either way what he isn't doing is making it clear what it will mean for women's rights or medical treatment of minors, what the LPs position is on those things.

And those are the real issues. One way or another hes going to have to take a position and not taking one means people will assume it's the TRA position because that's what they've been saying for the past years.

Report

LemonSqueezy0 · 15/04/2022 06:45

I feel like he is trying to vaguely say something here, after seeing the reaction that Boris got, but even being extra generous towards him, it's way too little, way too late. It's an indication of how lacking he is in a backbone if he can't even say what a women is. The fact that he thinks this is unsayable makes me think he is unelectable. He has #beKinded himself and labour out of my vote.

Report

EmbarrassingHadrosaurus · 15/04/2022 10:40

He's dealing out of both sides of his mouth.

Report

Loopytiles · 15/04/2022 10:41

Meaningless tripe.

‘Respected’ how?

Not hard to state positions on things like single sex sports and spaces.

Report

borntobequiet · 15/04/2022 10:44

No it’s still gibberish

I think we disagree on some things, Marsha, but I’m with you on this.

Report

leli · 15/04/2022 17:41

@A580Hojas

He has, sort of. Perhaps enough of us who care about this issue have put it right under the noses of our Labour party candidates and asked wtf. I emailed my female Labour MP and told her I wouldn't be voting Labour at the next GE and linked many Mumsnet threads in the email. Perhaps he finally FINALLY got wind of women's unrest.

It's not enough for me to change my mind though.

Hi, I just emailed my female MP, Tulip Siddiq too. I didn't think of sending Mumsnet links. I might email again with some in. I did tell her I need clarity from her about this issue before casting my vote and I asked her to send the email to Keir Starmer's office.

I think everyone should write to their Labour MP. It's easy to do. Google them, get to their website and use their contact email. Unless you have closer links of course.

Labour need to feel anxious about this issue.
Report

SolasAnla · 15/04/2022 17:54

@Tillsforthrills

Apologies if this has been posted.

“Sir Keir Starmer has said it is “plain common sense” that biology determines sex for the majority of women but that those who struggle with their gender identity should be respected”

Is this him back tracking due to the backlash?

Sir Keir Starmer has said for him the word woman means (most) females and some males. He supports the idea of reforming (making it better by correcting mistakes) the GRA

it is “plain common sense” that biology determines sex for the majority of women people but that those males who struggle with their gender identity should be respected as identifying into the class women

Once his definition of the word includes males he can say what he pleases.
Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

Sign up to continue reading

Mumsnet's better when you're logged in. You can customise your experience and access way more features like messaging, watch and hide threads, voting and much more.

Already signed up?