Feminism: chat
Has Keir Starmer backtracked?
Tillsforthrills · 13/04/2022 19:50
Apologies if this has been posted.
“Sir Keir Starmer has said it is “plain common sense” that biology determines sex for the majority of women but that those who struggle with their gender identity should be respected”
Is this him back tracking due to the backlash?
ChiefInspectorParker · 13/04/2022 20:01
This reply has been withdrawn
Message from MNHQ: This post has been withdrawn
Pixiedust1234 · 13/04/2022 20:08
Backtracked on what exactly? He still hasn't said that men can never be a biological woman. Or that biological raping males should not be in womens prisons. Or that men pretending to be women shouldn't be in womens changing rooms.
So what has he actually said?
Tillsforthrills · 13/04/2022 20:22
@Pixiedust1234
Yes I’m trying to figure out if it is or isn’t backtracking.
Although he hasn’t said men can’t be women, his first statement seemed categorically in favour of trans women’s rights over biological women’s rights.
This time he’s saying it’s common sense that biology decides sex in the ‘majority’ of cases. Confusing!
HermioneWeasley · 13/04/2022 20:26
If the “majority” of women are determined by their biology, that implies a “minority” of women whose womanhood isn’t determined by their sex, ie:male women. He still believes there are male women who are women and entitled to our sex based rights. It’s the same position as he’s always held - there should be no place these males can’t go.
He can fuck off.
Whatiswrongwithmyknee · 13/04/2022 20:33
It's quite simple really. He doesn't understand biology. He doesn't care about women. He thinks the electorate are too stupid to see through his nonsense.
He's given people permission to identify their way into wherever they want and he doesn't give a shit about the consequences.
Lovely.
A580Hojas · 13/04/2022 21:01
He has, sort of. Perhaps enough of us who care about this issue have put it right under the noses of our Labour party candidates and asked wtf. I emailed my female Labour MP and told her I wouldn't be voting Labour at the next GE and linked many Mumsnet threads in the email. Perhaps he finally FINALLY got wind of women's unrest.
It's not enough for me to change my mind though.
TeiTetua · 14/04/2022 19:21
It's a pathetic attempt to offer something to women without alienating the trans mob. He wants to say something and nothing at the same time.
He wants to "respect trans people" but when the decision has to be made, give them access to single-sex spaces or tell them to stay out, then he's going to keep his head down and try to stay out of the fight. If that means the woke side drives anyone else out of the party, along with lots of voters, then so be it.
MangyInseam · 15/04/2022 02:08
One possibility is that he is just trying to have it both ways - appeasing those on both sides of the issue.
It's also possible that he is thinking of those who hold a GRC as being women and so he i saying that for most women it's a biological category and for a few a legal fiction. As a lawyer he may well be disposed to think of that as "real".
But either way what he isn't doing is making it clear what it will mean for women's rights or medical treatment of minors, what the LPs position is on those things.
And those are the real issues. One way or another hes going to have to take a position and not taking one means people will assume it's the TRA position because that's what they've been saying for the past years.
LemonSqueezy0 · 15/04/2022 06:45
I feel like he is trying to vaguely say something here, after seeing the reaction that Boris got, but even being extra generous towards him, it's way too little, way too late. It's an indication of how lacking he is in a backbone if he can't even say what a women is. The fact that he thinks this is unsayable makes me think he is unelectable. He has #beKinded himself and labour out of my vote.
leli · 15/04/2022 17:41
@A580Hojas
It's not enough for me to change my mind though.
Hi, I just emailed my female MP, Tulip Siddiq too. I didn't think of sending Mumsnet links. I might email again with some in. I did tell her I need clarity from her about this issue before casting my vote and I asked her to send the email to Keir Starmer's office.
I think everyone should write to their Labour MP. It's easy to do. Google them, get to their website and use their contact email. Unless you have closer links of course.
Labour need to feel anxious about this issue.
SolasAnla · 15/04/2022 17:54
@Tillsforthrills
“Sir Keir Starmer has said it is “plain common sense” that biology determines sex for the majority of women but that those who struggle with their gender identity should be respected”
Is this him back tracking due to the backlash?
Sir Keir Starmer has said for him the word woman means (most) females and some males. He supports the idea of reforming (making it better by correcting mistakes) the GRA
it is “plain common sense” that biology determines sex for the majority of women people but that those males who struggle with their gender identity should be respected as identifying into the class women
Once his definition of the word includes males he can say what he pleases.
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.