'We' might be pregnant but 'we' aren't a family:
Jay and I would like to have our own biological child. To do this, we’d have to go down the surrogacy route. In traditional surrogacy, the baby is related to the mother – it’s her egg that is fertilised and she’d carry the child. We’ve spoken (often drunkenly) to female friends about them doing this and we always get caught up in the moment, but in reality, this wouldn’t work for us.
We worry it would make things weird between us and the friend and we wouldn’t feel comfortable if they wanted to be a big part of the child’s life. We want to be the child’s only parents and it wouldn’t be fair on either party to enter a situation where neither was 100% happy.
The surrogacy route you see most often – particularly with gay male celebrities, like we’re currently seeing with Ollie Lockee* – is gestational. This involves a donated egg being implanted into a surrogate and can cost tens of thousands of pounds, including fees for fertility treatment and surrogate expenses, among other things."
This man goes on to make the case for NHS funding of surrogacy for gay men (they are both broke and living with a grandparent so maybe that's why the NHS should pay for the surrogate mother's 'expenses') and that if " surrogacy doesn’t work out, maybe we will adopt. It’d be an honour, but I still don’t think it should be an obligation."
And this is interesting. Who do they need 'help' from? Not just fertility doctors...
"While many people (cis-heterosexual included) go through years of trying to conceive, or failed IVF attempts, never having their parenting dreams realised – as gay menn, it is unfortunately inevitable that we will need help to have children*."
https://metro.co.uk/2021/08/21/not-all-gay-men-want-to-adopt-dont-judge-me-for-wanting-my-own-kids-15123816/