grey You are so right about psychiatry not dealing with trauma. I suppose it goes against the whole biological basis for their discipline. Although some do cross over into psychology, we need more of this! Also, I though it had been policy across the NHS to exclude peope diagnosed BPD from services? Hence the fanfare at no longer doing so in 2007. Am amazed some areas had services! I must have been very unlucky (2004/5). If you'd be happy to PM me the area/trust you were under at the time, I'd be interested to look into this. I understand if you'd rather not, though.
Marbelous I love your username. For the completely random reason it reminds me of the Malay word for 15, which is "lima belas", which I always hear as "le marbelous" and makes me think of someone saying "bloody marvellous"! Ahem.
cat Yes, it's so frustrating isn't it? The whole system seems to be full of catch 22s. Can you appeal the WCA decision? Appeals seem to have a high sucess rate (I appealed and won after scoring 0).
Had to send off benefit form and it has deranged me. Feel like I'm lying when I tell the truth because I'm so used to thinking I'm fine really and should just manage fine and not make a fuss. Then when I remind myself it's true I feel really shit and hopeless. (Although it did make me smile when it said "please fill out this form in ink" - what else were people using? Blood?!)
The worst bit was seeing my CMHT discharge letter again. Full of lies and misdirection. So distressing and makes me feel so powerless and sort of stitched up by services. They write stuff that sounds reasonable but anyone who knows about psychology, treatments etc would spot the misdirection - but of course those in power, or PALS, or whoever would not spot it. For eg. they write that they have offered me DBT "which is the NICE recommended therapy". Sounds lovely and helpful. Only they haven't offered it to me - thay have offered very watered down little chats about DBT skills (which I didn't even know was the purpose of the chats beforehand). Which is not recommended, because that is not DBT. All the resarch on DBT would not include that. And Marsha Linehan who invented DBT is very clear about how it's supposed to be done. (It's supposed to be very structured and includes individual therapy, group skills sessions, and phone coaching). Also, they only offer stage 1 which is meant to reduce life-threatening and self-destructive behaviours. Stages 2-4 are the actual "healing" part, once the person is stable, but "living a life of quiet desperation". I'm at that stage, that's the bit where past trauma is treated. But they prefer to just harp on about "managing distress" and so on, actually getting better and functioning again doesn't matter, as long as you're not bothering them.
But I digress. The point is, most people would assume I had been offered DBT and that what I had been offered was clinically effective. So I look like I'm the problem for "not engaging". Even though I did engage and try to explain as best as possible to the person I saw (who was an occupational therapist not a psych nurse, psychologist or psychotherapist!) She vaguely mentioned DBT and I expressed my concerns, even she agreed my main presenting problem seems to be depression. Then they write it up that I've refused DBT!
