Thanks PD and SPC - You are right PD about going round in circles and exhausting myself and causing sky high anxiety. However I have made the decision not to go ahead. I was googling again earlier today and found something from the Royal College of Psychiatrists "Memory and cognitive effects of ECT: informing and assessing patients" which really made my mind up. There was a section "What Patients Should be Told" and it was very clear that patients should be warned about the possibility of permanent memory loss, both long term and short term, and sometimes both together. The article was very clear - "no consent should be signed until ALL of the possible side effects have been clearly explained" and "alarmingly some 50% of patients report that possible side effects were not discussed with them...." and recommending that issues around consent need to be revised.
It said much more about the need for patients to be fully informed of the possible risks especially in relation to memory loss, and explained why the surveys for clinical and patient memory loss following ECT were so different. Much higher (up to 50%) in patient surveys. I was really upset and annoyed at reading all this, as my psychiatrist initially told me "there was no evidence of memory loss" and on my 2nd appointment she was not willing to discuss any risks of memory loss, though gave me a doc from RCofP. When I spoke to her yesterday I said I was not going ahead because of my concern about memory loss and she said "I thought we'd discussed all that last week....." My friend was with me and she has no recollection of this discussion either!
Anyway after reading all this stuff today I printed it off, highlighting all the issues and wrote a covering letter saying that I was not going ahead and was concerned that the guidelines had not been followed in my case as I should have been given full information as outlined in the doc I attached.
I'm relieved I've made a decision but also angry that she just ignored the advice from the Royal College of Psychiatrists, and had I not had the sense to research myself, I would have had no idea of the risks. Also I had allowed myself to have a tiny hope that I might get my life back, and now that hope has been dashed. I did say in my letter that I was aware of the lack of research on cognitive impairment following ECT and that I knew she was endeavouring to act in my best interests but I felt that I should have had the information outlined in the doc in order that I could make an informed decision. I confirmed I wanted to try lithium. She is leaving the Trust at the end of this month. My CPN is away this week and she won't be pleased, but what the hell, it's my brain isn't it.........
Thanks again - nice to see you silvery and to know you're well - assume you finally moved house? I know lithium is very effective in bipolar but apparently there is evidence that it can be effective in unipolar. Worth a try anyway.