ds in school-less risk to them and teachers...
Today 08:09RedToothBrush
This guy works for yougov
Chris Curtis @chriscurtis94
Whilst I’m sure you are all loving your opportunity to bash Millennials based on what you saw on Clapham Common earlier, the data doesn’t really show them to be the problem.
The very old are acting differently to everyone else, but no generational gap apart from that.
I'm not going to try to defend men though.
Men are definitely the problem.
e.g. this question (from Tuesday) on the proportion of people who were “still going out as normal":
Women 65+: 30%
Women 50-64: 43%
Women 25-49: 35%
Women 18-24: 40%
Men 65+: 38%
Men 50-64: 51%
Men 25-49: 47%
Men 18-24: 52%
(I assume this has gone up across the board since then, but I would bet the pattern still remain similar.)
But either way, once you get below 65, age is the dividing line, not gender.
Same holds for proportion who would not self isolate if they had symptoms:
65+: 5%
50-64: 10%
25-49: 11%
18-24: 10%
Women: 6%
Men: 13%
Two theories as to why this might be.
Firstly, men have different attitudes to risk. On a 0-10 scale (where 10 is the riskiest), the proportion who would place themselves 7-10:
Men (under 65): 38%
Women (under 65): 24%
(Note: You can use more elaborate tests of risk, you will always get the same picture).
Secondly, men are harder to shame. Proportion who say they "care too much what others think":
Men: 48%
Women: 63%
I would also speculate there is less deference to authority among men, although don't have anything to back that up.
And I would also expect there to be a selfishness angle, but that is hard get get at in survey research.
Ben W Ansell @Benwansell
Chris, do you think this might be related to different educational patterns among younger men and women as well?
Chris Curtis @chriscurtis94
Was just thinking that.
I think it is likely that education might be canceling out an age effect that would otherwise exist.