Sorry to keep going on about the Labour Party but
I kind of think it matters.
Not having an Opposition - or even the promise of one - Is a significant part of figuring out the terrain of the present and near-future.
And I really don't know that we have one.
A lot of very, very good Labour MPs have been trapped in the back benches and deliberately side-lined. That even happened to Keir Starmer to an extent.
They're just waiting to be de-selected & replaces with someone more acceptable.
I don't think many people outside the Labour Party appreciate how deep the problem is.
Ed Miliband changed structures within the Party, the hard Left then moved fast to change still more.
I actually don't know if it is even possible to change it back.
For those thinking we just have to wait for a Kinnock, I can tell you that that is not going to happen.
The numbers of members are against that.
In the Corbyn/Smith leadership contest, 313k voted Corbyn and
193k voted Smith.
Since then
90k have left Labour (many of whom were moderates)
We're looking at a massive imbalance within the Labour Party (200K?) membership - and that's before you even start thinking about re-organisation of Union funding/backing and Party institutions like the NEC (hard Left controlled).
And there is a whole issue of demographics. The hard Left is weirdly doughnut shaped: lots of retirees, lots of young people and very few people in their 50s.
Weirdly, that works against moderation. The younger people 'know' that their politics will, eventually, prevail - just the simple fact of human mortality will deliver it. So they just need to hang on in there for 20 years or so.
The older people probably own houses, with mortgage paid.
The people who need change, now, are not in Labour. I suspect a fair few of them are in that group of people who've left.
(I have many thoughts on this I represented group, by the way.)
Anyway, I just think there is a real uphill task - and the situation isn't comparable to the 80s/90s.