So you think 1 No Dealer vs 2 Revokers would better reflect how the ref went ?
Bcf that's a misleading comment based on current polling.
This is the first Westminster voting intention poll I came across at random. The point still stands with post of the other recent polls though.
Westminster voting intention:
CON: 29% (+1)
LAB: 27% (-)
LDEM: 21% (+1)
BREX: 13% (-)
GRN: 5% (-)
via @ComRes, 18 - 19 Sep
29% +13% = 42
27% + 21% = 48
And no one has counted the Greens.
Polling at 13% is not insignificant. The Brexit Party policy is relevant here, yet you've automatically just ignored it.
Why?
Here's another
Westminster voting intention:
CON: 37% (-)
LAB: 22% (-3)
LDEM: 17% (+1)
BREX: 12% (-1)
GRN: 4% (-)
via @OpiniumResearch
Chgs. w/ 13 Sep
37 + 12 = 49
22 + 17 = 39
And another:
Westminster voting intention:
CON: 33% (-1)
LAB: 24% (-)
LDEM: 23% (+3)
BREX: 10% (+1)
GRN: 4% (-2)
via @IpsosMORI
Chgs. w/ July
33 + 10 = 43
24 + 23 = 47
And here's YouGov to make up a quartet
Westminster voting intention:
CON: 32% (-)
LDEM: 23% (+4)
LAB: 21% (-2)
BREX: 14% (-)
GRN: 4% (-3)
via @YouGov
32 + 14 = 46
23 + 21 = 44
So I'm sorry, I'm not seeing your logic of why you think if Labour had gone pro remain, remain would have been over represented by parties.
As it goes, I do think being pro ref is a legitimate policy decision. What I'm less impressed at is the antics that went on to ensure that, and the extremely thin veneer of internal party democracy on display.