Leaver RNorth: Scathing forensic analysis dissecting the lies in the ERG claims about WTO rules, presented by Lilley
In case anyone needs to refute Leavers copying his claims that WTO rules would be fine
http://www.eureferendum.com/blogview.aspx?blogno=87061
...the WTO has in the matter is in its insistence that (with certain exemptions), all goods are treated in the same way.
This applies specifically to countries where there are no formal free trade agreements, so that the goods from country X must be subjected to the same regime as is applied to country Y.
....
the law would never restrict locations to a border because inland airports also handle goods which must be checked.
What the law actually states, therefore is that the BIP must be "located in the immediate vicinity of the point of entry" into the Member State.
And here, one should note the caveat "immediate".
Conveniently, Lilley omits this all-important caveat.
^
But the law does not even stop there.^
It goes on to say that the area in which a BIP is situate must be one "which is designated by the customs authorities in accordance with the first subparagraph, points (a) and (b) of Article 38(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/922^.^
^That effectively means an area designated by the customs authorities and under their supervision.
^...
Rotterdam is not so much a port as a port complex, stretching from the Maas^ estuary at the North Sea end, with the Kloosterboer Delta Terminal, into the heart of the city, with an outpost Dordrecht on the Oude Maas.
In all, it extends over 40 kms from end to end (pictured).
^
Putting this in context, even if the BIP was bang in the centre of the port complex, it would still be 20 km from the "border" – i.e., the seaward edge of the complex.^
As it is, the ERG cannot even get that right.
There are in fact four separate facilities registered with the EU, including one at the Kloosterboer Delta Terminal, right at the entrance to the estuary.
...
The reality is that sanitary inspections and the need for BIPs blows a gaping hole in the ERG case for frictionless trade based on WTO rules and/or free trade areas.
But, being unable to wish away the inconvenient truths, Lilley does the next best thing.
He lies.