northern - can there be anything sensible left to say about homeopathy? The placebo effect is powerful, no doubt and the best account I've read of this is in Ben Goldacre's 2008 book "Bad Science'. He writes: '..while there may be a role for an ethical placebo, homeopaths, at least, have ably demonstrated that they have neither the maturity nor the professionalism to provide it.'
Sorry for that aside, everyone else!
To apply this in some way to Steiner education: when someone says 'Of course I don't believe in anthroposophy and it doesn't effect my family (we're far too rational) but I'm quite happy that the teachers believe in it and others are adversely effected by it because on the whole people have the right to their spiritual beliefs, however odd. And some people probably need it and benefit from it and anyway it isn't doing them any real harm, since it isn't real. (Goodness, I think that was me a few years ago)
This is rather like saying 'Of course I know homeopathy doesn't work but it's great that other people more credulous than me think it does, since that means there's a useful placebo effect that keeps them out of doctors' waiting rooms!' And many GPs would agree with you.
I think if Steiner schools were more transparent about their philosophy they would have few customers. I note a transcript of a 'circle meeting' at one school (on the web! Amazing!) in which one present asks: 'Do we have to mention Steiner? Or anthroposophy?'
Nontoxic: if you can fathom the last couple of messages I wish you would let us know. I see what you mean about random in words order.