slug on Fri 09-Jan-09 13:06:52
"What I was pointing out is there is a link between parents failing to back up the school in matters of discipline and poor behaviour in schools. Positive praise is a very effective technique. But if we don't teach our children to face the consequences of their actions, be they 2, 7 or 17 then when exactly do you think it is a good time to teach people that actions have consequences? When they are 21? When they break the speed limit? When they are in the dock for stabbing someone? "
I agree in principle but am a bit worried about how this has worked out for my dd in the past. Because she was so sure that we, as good parents, would back up the school she never told us that she had to crawl on her hands and knees to get to the toilet because the head refused to let her use the disabled toilet, or that she wasn't getting any maths lessons because the school wouldn't change the sets round to put hers on the ground floor. She suffered discrimination for several years and was made to do some very dangerous things given her condition (which they knew about) because she thought it would be wrong to question the decisions of her teachers. She got terribly agitated when I finally found out what was going on and wanted to complain.
I tried to explain the difference between backing the school up when she was being naughty and backing it up when she was not, but she told me I did not understand what the English system is like (having been brough up abroad), and that questioning a teacher's decision is naughty in itself and would make her naughty, so that she would then need to be disciplined for that.
Of course, I don't want her to get into trouble with the law, but I don't want her to think it's ok for adults in authority to break the law either. Or that noone must ever protest.
Dd is certainly not lazy or undisciplined, but I have had to work hard on disabusing her of the notion that a teacher is always right. Came naturally to me, because both my parents were teachers