Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Education

Join the discussion on our Education forum.

For anyone wanting to know about Steiner Waldorf schools but are now too afraid to ask.....

90 replies

barking · 03/07/2008 19:25

The article I have posted below was linked to the other week on the steiner thread 3 and as a result it would appear Thebee has managed to spook mumnet into banning:

Zzooey
PeteK
DianaW
PowerofJoy
Easeonline

Myself and Northernrefugee have asked repeatedly why but have had no clear reply other than talk of a 'crusade' which is the very same word Thebee (Sune Nordwall) has used in the page below.

I have asked about the possibility of taking out liability insurance so myself and others are able to speak truthfully and freely on a subject we feel strongly about.

I don't understand how other members of mumsnet are allowed to speak only on one topic and not be banned, one recent example is the Alphamummy thread.

Neither do I understand why we have had no response to our request to have these people reinstated when other posters on mumsnet have been allowed to come back for far more serious crimes. All we have ever done is speak the truth.

I find it so disappointing that for anyone interested in alternative/progressive/natural education will no longer have access to these threads as much of the information and our experiences have been deleted from the threads.

It would appear that mumsnet believes a 58 year old childless man who seems to have dedicated the last 10 years of his life into controlling information on the web about steiner/waldorf/anthoposphy. I believe the article below is a set up to provoke a big reaction from both mumnet and the fellow posters that were banned.

Can someone please be kind enough to explain what the ban is about and how we can get this very important subject back up and running please.

The article is below, so you can make your own mind up:

From www.thebee.se/comments/MN.html

Some comments on discussions of Steiner Waldorf education at Mumsnet
Since 2007, "Northernrefugee39", an intense talkative professed atheist, socialist and republican, and former Steiner Waldorf mother in the U.K, with very little patience for what she thinks are "boring" discussions, has been pursuing a persistent anti Steiner school crusade at Mumsnet.

She has posted in all threads she has found where she has been able to find any possibility to express her antipathy towards Steiner Waldorf education, from threads having nothing to do as such with Steiner Waldorf education, to threads discussing Steiner Waldorf education in general, to all discussions of one or other specific waldorf school in the U.K.

INTERNET TROLLING CAMPAIGN

When she later this year has tried to pursue her anti-Waldorf crusade also in other parenting forums on the net, she has been less successful and has been banned for trolling at a number of them.

This is the case at the Green Parent forum, where she, like at Mumsnet, tried to pursue her anti-Waldorf crusade in all Waldorf threads she could find, but soon was banned for her aggressive trolling. The BBC parenting forum did not like her aggressive anti-Steiner trolling either but deleted a number of her postings and banned her from further discussions. When she has pursued a similar anti-Steiner trolling campaign at Mothering in the U.S., she has been banned from further participation in the Waldorf discussions there too.

WC

In support of her anti-Waldorf trolling crusade at Mumsnet she has been joined by some fellow members of an anti-Waldorf mailing list in English on the net, "waldorf critics" (WC), where she participates.

The list is owned by the secretary since long of a small anti-Waldorf fringe group in California, "PLANS Inc.", much rooted in his efforts since the end of the 1980s to actively spread secular humanism in the San Francisco Bay Area.

When the large web portal DMOZ in 2001 looked at the site of the group, it decided that it did not qualify and deleted it from its Waldorf category as "informational" source on Steiner Waldorf education.

After Altavista looked closer at the site of the group two years later, in 2003, it took the drastic action to complertely delete all links to it from its web index as "informational" site on Steiner Waldorf education and refused to publish any sponsored ad from overture.com for searches on "waldorf", "waldorf education", and "Rudolf Steiner", regardless of their origin, to get rid of the ads for PLANS for the searches..

In contrast to this judgement by DMOZ and Altavista of the site as "informational" source on Steiner Waldorf education, Northernrefugee39 in the discussions at Mumsnet repeatedly recommends its disinformation on Steiner Waldorf education as "information" on Waldorf education.

For a description of the group, see here.

For a shorter introductory description of the origin, nature, history and argumentation of the group, that started its anti-Waldorf campaign ten years ago supporting allegations that "Waldorf schools teach the pupils witchcraft", see Americans for Waldorf Education

For a summary on the group and its activities the last ten years, see Americans for Waldorf Education too.

The main anti-Waldorf argumentation of Northernrefugee39 and other waldorf critics in the thread that they occupy at Mumsnet - and where they bully everyone who does not agree with them - is that Steiner Waldorf schools don't give children a good education.

WORLD CONSPIRACY MYTH...

Instead they - according to Northernrefugee39 - in secret indoctrinate the pupils with anthroposophy, the spiritually oriented philosophy that constitutes the general basis of Waldorf education, with the goal - according to Northern - of making them into a "spiritually superior group".

Her argument is part of a slightly paranoid, since long cultivated and published myth by the WC-group - an "Anthroposophical World Conspiracy" myth. According to the myth, the secret goal of Steiner Waldorf education - not told to the parents - is to train the future rulers of the world, which seems to stand in contrast to the alleged failure of the schools to even teach the pupils to read and write properly ...

For an introduction to actual Waldorf education and how it is related to anthroposophy, see Waldorf Answers.

For a more detailed description of Waldorf education, see the Wikipedia article on the subject.

The arguments by "critics" of Steiner Waldorf education at Mumsnet is based much on the slower way the pupils during the first grades at the schools are brought from a play stage of childhood over stories in different forms, from myths to nature stories, up to the present time, and the slower way first writing and then reading is taught at Waldorf schools during the first years at school, which at Waldorf schools start for the children at age 7, and the way they learn reading more at their own pace without pressure, at times only reading fully without effort at age 10 or 11.

The contrast is especially great during the earlier years at Steiner Waldorf schools in relation to how reading is taught, not least in schools in the U.K., where primary school education is compulsory already from age 5, and children most commonly enter reception class at age 4 in the academic year in which they will reach their 5th birthday.

The suspicion and allegation by critics is that Steiner Waldorf schools therefore do not give the pupils a good education but - from a marked outspoken atheist perspective - are a sort of covert religious parochial schools, who don't through eight or twelve years give their pupils a good education but instead indoctrinate them with anthroposophy. This is contradicted by among other things the numerous parents, who through the years have chosen a Waldorf school for their children, and a number of the pupils who have gone there. (At present there exist 900+ Steiner Waldorf schools incl. adult education, world wide)

ACTUAL WALDORF PARENTS AND PUPILS

To the group of the numerous present or former Steiner Waldorf parents belong among other Helmut Kohl, former German Chancellor, Heinz Galinski, Auschwitz survivor and former President of the Central Jewish Council in Germany, Karl Otto Pöhl, former President of German Federal Bank for nine years, Walter Riester, former German Minister of Labour, Otto Schily, former German Minister of the Interior and President by Seniority of German Federal Parliament, Hans-Dietrich Genscher, former German Minister of Foreign Affairs, Eugen Wagner, former Senator, Hamburg Ernst-Jörg von Studnitz, former German Ambassador to Russia, Knut Frydenlund, former Norwegian Minister of Foreign Affairs, Thorvald Stoltenberg, former Norwegian Minister of Foreign Affairs, Jonas Gahr Støre, present Norwegian Minister of Foreign Affairs.

Among former Waldorf parents one also finds Wolfgang Sauer, former President of Volkswagen in Brasil, Erwin Neher, Nobel Laureate in medicine 1991, Gilbert M. Grosvenor (1875-1966), President & Chairman, National Geographic Society, Clifford Stoll, astronomer, co-developer of the Internet, Russell Schweickart, Apollo 9 astronaut, NASA Astronaut Technical Advisor, California Energy Commission, Eric Utne, founder of, publisher, and former editor-in-chief of Utne Reader (now Waldorf teacher), Mikhail Baryshnikov, well known Russian ballet dancer and actor, Robert Jungk, Austrian writer and journalist, Harvey Keitel, Jessica Lange and Sam Shepard, George Lucas, (director, Star Wars), Clint Eastwood and Frances Fisher, André Previn, conductor, composer, pianist, Rosie O'Donnell, comedian, television talk show host, author, 11 times Emmy Award winner, Liv Ullmann and Ingmar Bergman.

To the group of former Waldorf pupils belong the former Presidential candidate John Kerry and his sister Diana (implied by Diana Kerry in an interview in der Tagesspiegel in 2004 about the time they spent in Berlin in the 1950's, when their father worked there as diplomat at the American Consulate), Kenneth Chenault, former President and present Chief Executive Officer of American Express, Jens Stoltenberg, Prime Minister of Norway, Andreas Carlgren, Swedish Minister for the Environment, Prof. Dr. Wolfram Achtnich, plant cultivation scientist, Scott Boman, American libertarian politician, Mosemarie Boyd, President & CEO of "American Women Presidents", Prof. Dr. Wolf-Christian Dullo, Oceanographer, Konrad Schily, Member of the German Parliament; founder and former President of University Witten-Herdecke, Andreas Schleicher, Inventor of the Programme for International Student Assessment, Head of the Indicators and Analysis Division (Directorate for Education) OECD, Karl Matthäus Schmidt, CEO of quirin bank (a German bank specialized in Private Banking, Corporate Banking and Business Process Outsourcing).

Other former Waldorf pupils are Freimut Duve, politician and journalist; former member of German Parliament, Olaf Feldmann, former member of the German Parliament, Pekka Haavisto, member of the Finnish Parliament, former Finnish Minister of Environment, Hans-Peter Lehmann, former director of the State Opera in Hannover, Victor Navasky, Professor of journalism, Columbia University, former editor and now publisher emeritus of "The Nation", Kristen Nygaard, Professor of informatics, co-inventor of object orientated programming, Michael Rogowski, Vice President of the Federal Association of the German Industry "BDI", former President of BDI, Aram Roston, CNN and newspaper reporter, George Hume, BBC journalist and newspaper columnist for Herald Tribune and other British papers, Joern G. Stegen, Diplomat (retired), working with the Council of Europe for 38 years, Oras Tynkkynen, member of the Finnish Parliament, Linn Ullmann, internationally acclaimed writer and journalist, daughter of Liv Ullmann and Ingmar Bergman, Jennifer Aniston, winner of Golden Globe, Julianna Margulies, nominated for 6 Golden Globes, Sandra Bullock, screen actress, Rutger Hauer, screen actor, winner of Golden Globe, Michael Ende, one of the most popular and famous German authors of the 20th century ("Momo", "The Neverending Story"), Ari Behn, writer, husband of Princess Märtha Louise of Norway, Barbara Becker, actress, ex-wife of Boris Becker, Timothy Daly, actor, Chris Elliott, screen actor and TV-entertainer, Anna Paquin, actor, Academy Award winner for Best Supporting Actress in "The Piano", to mention a few.

For some more of the many distinguished Waldorf parents and pupils from different walks of life in different countries, see here.

MORE COMMENTS

For some comments on Waldorf education by some of the Waldorf parents/pupils mentioned above, and some others, like Selma Lagerlöf, 1909 Swedish Nobel Literature Laureate, Albert Schweizer, 1952 Nobel Peace Laureate, Stefan Zweig (1881-1942), author, and Andrei Tarkovsky (1932-1986), Russian film director (Solaris, Stalker, Nostalghia, The Sacrifice), see the site of Waldorf Answers that also addresses a number of the myths about Waldorf education cultivated in the Mumsnet discussions.

The comments mentioned and the numerous Waldorf parents who have chosen a Waldorf education for their children through the 20th century world wide - clearly only a very small sample is mentioned above - put what Northernrefugee39 (and her fellow companeros from the mailing list of the WC anti-Waldorf fringe group) write at Mumsnet in a sobering perspective.

OP posts:
northernrefugee39 · 04/07/2008 11:55

shirleyghostman

it's quite difficult to reply to your post on the other thread of course, because they are probably being reported and are often deleted.

I take great exception that you have implied my posts aren't truthful. I'm still waiting for you to pint to which ones you are questioning, because every word of our experience as a family has been true, an every quote of Steiner's I can give a source to.

PootyApplewater
The Bee has been banned as well.
The fact is that hardly anyone supporting Steiner comes on- there was some very strange person from US called Isenhart, who barely made sense, but I think she /he may have been banned or got bored.

The threads are coming to a natural end now anyway, there are other things going on.

I would say that they banned those particular ones because they don't post anywhere else on mumsnet.
I was in a similar position on mothering.co in US, which is a really dreadful forum, but has some anthroposophists on it pretending not to be and coming on all the waldorf threads to promote the schooling. A couple of them actually co wrote one of the bees pro waldorf websites. I was banned there quite quickly, but tbh they were pretty ghastly.

barking · 04/07/2008 12:06

PootyApplewater - I don't think Eva52/Thebee is able to post, I did report him myself at one point as he continously linked to his own websites.

As you rightly said both Eva/Thebee and Isenhart played this very passive/aggressive game with their posting, they became very personal, there were times when I sunk very low myself out of sheer frustration.

He is very savvy about the internet and chat forums, it only occured to me after about a month of him posting on here that if he didn't like what was written here, he would either write multiple posts or big swathes of quotes in order to push the post he was worried about further down the page or off the current page. I have never come across this type of behaviour before on the internet.

Like others have said mumnset isn't the place for a personal crusade, he has his own websites to do that. I guess what happened is that these conversations generated a lot of interest in the steiner community whether it was parents and teachers who strongly believe it is the right thing for them and parents and a previous pupil who have had many years experience of being inside these institutions/communities and found that the reason why these schools exist is hidden.

So the conversations veered from the reality of our experiences to their reality of what they want it to be and what they want others to believe it to be....

The bottom line for me is that if someone hits my child very hard I don't believe it is a spiritual act, I don't buy they are working our their karma or have challenges incarnating. It is very dangerous, that is why I am still here writing about it. I will never understand how these schools are allowed to get away with hiding their true purpose. I get more frustrated as I keep hearing of more parents coming forward saying they were also lied to.

Because the school didn't tell me what they believed in before I moved home and registered my child for what I thought would be a wholesome education, I am consequently upset that they have hidden a whole belief system by wrapping it up in nature and art

OP posts:
barking · 04/07/2008 12:10

Hi Northern I'm still here, limping along!

OP posts:
northernrefugee39 · 04/07/2008 19:24

Well, it's still going. I'm surprised the posts I wrote as a reply to shirelyghostman on the other threasd were pulled. I removed the links to Peter Staudenmaier's articles in case mumsnet were afraid of them, I removed Steiner's anti semitic stuff, which is all over the other threads, and STILL they were removed.

I actully think it's a scandal that mumsnet are removing anyhing that's complained about on a public discussion board.
Forr God's sake, it's a discussion board. Does that mean that if i went and complained about a post on Boden, they would remove it do you think.
"Boden clothes offend me. They are expensive, too loud, too recognisable, David Cameron wears them" LIBELOUS.

northernrefugee39 · 04/07/2008 19:32

Do you think they'll remove a post which says Steiner schools are based on a pseudo religion which is rooted in racist thought? And that some of those ideas could have been the reason my daughter was made to play an ugly dark dwarf while her friends were golden haired princesses and queens?

And that they didn't stop bullying in the school?
And that the teachers shouted, dragged children around and left them in dangerous situations?

Or that the classes were so badly taught, and some teachers had no qualifications apart from a part time Steiner course, not even A-levels.

That's all before the Steiner curriculum is taken into account, the crazy beliefs about evolution, science, temperaments etc etc etc.

barking · 04/07/2008 19:42

Hi Northern

Have you noticed that if you type 'Peter Staudenmaier' into google it will take quite a while to find his articles, all the pages that come up first are from the groups defending steiner

They are trying to make it very hard for prospective parents to make an informed decision before they enroll their child

OP posts:
northernrefugee39 · 04/07/2008 20:08

yes I know, alot of them are people like Daniel Hindes and Sune's sites aren't they? The thought of a really respected academic and historian from one of the best Universities inthe world like Peter Staudenmaier, and the small ry who try to argue pathetically around him is laughable.

It's unfortunate that the defenders seem to have so much time on their hands....

Peter staudenmaier isn't even a critic, he's a historian interested in facts about Steiner and his beliefs.

workstostaysane · 04/07/2008 20:17

whoa!
the title of this thread is woefully misleading. the first post is utterly unintelligible and it seems to get worse.

i clicked to try and find out some info about Steiner schooling having seen some big old debates raging in the past. I am now completely convinced not to go anywhere near it as no one who has an opinion seems able to express it in any communicable way to an outsider.

Was that the point of the OP? Impossible to tell from what is written.

workstostaysane · 04/07/2008 20:26

ah, have just got through some more posts and realize that WAS the point of the OP.
well, job done.

barking · 04/07/2008 20:38

Workstostaysane - ok, the long and the short of it is that steiner schools are riding the wave of post millenium angst - every parent wants the very best for their child and these schools peddle an alternative to all that is scary in the modern world

The reality however is that they are not the green wholesome arty schools we thought they were, they believe it best not to tell you until they think you are spiritually ready they are really a spriritual science movement (see how good I'm being with my euphimisms mnhq) that is called anthoposophy

When I asked the school what is anthroposophy - they replied it is the study of the wisdom of man, after being involved with steiner/waldorf/anthoposophist I can assure you no wisdom is involved.

OP posts:
barking · 04/07/2008 20:40

Sorry Worktostaysane - I didn't make the op very clear, the article is nothing to do with me but everything to do with lots of parents being banned on here

OP posts:
barking · 04/07/2008 20:49

I think - as I still have had no reply...

OP posts:
workstostaysane · 04/07/2008 21:33

thanks for such a reasoned reply to a slightly yelping post barking.
I'm actually thinking of educating dcs at home for a while and so I'm interested in, let us say, non mainstream forms of education when they do go, as they eventually will.

I know v. little about steiner, except from some stuff written on home ed sites. Wwhat puts me off the most though (and which is just confirmed by this thread) is that there is so much use of esoteric and obscure language by anyone who has anything to do with steiner -which is a sure sign that things cannot be what they seem on the outside.
If one can't explain a program so that most people can understand what you're talking about, then its too self involved to be of any real use.

anyway, I'm sorry to read about what sound like some pretty harrowing experiences on this thread and won't be sniffing around steiner stuff again.
best wishes

Nancy66 · 05/07/2008 09:32

All this Steiner stuff is so tediuosly dull. It just seems that the same half a dozen people are obsessed to the point of mental illness.
Surely everybody with an opinion has had a chance to air their view about 100 times over by now? Jesus, let it go....

AMumInScotland · 05/07/2008 20:54

I don't want to get into the rights and wrongs of people being banned from MN, as I think there are points on both sides.

But can I make a suggestion? Are there any websites which explain the concerns you have about Steiner education? Or other places on the web to which you could refer people?

Over on Home Education, we found we were often giving out the same information - lists of books, basic legal info etc - and on one poster's suggestion we set up threads which gave that info. Now when someone comes on with a familiar question, we simply refer them to that thread and bump it up to highlight it for them.

If you were to set up a thread which gave basic info, outlined your concerns, and pointed people to websites which gave info (and possibly also the pro-Steiner websites for "fairness"), then you could refer to it and bump it when the issue of Steiner education comes up. That might be effecive in informing parents, while avoiding the "private arguments" which have caused difficulties.

northernrefugee39 · 06/07/2008 10:58

Hi amum. That's a really good suggestion and thanks for it. I think it could work well, as long as the people reporting posts which mumsnet towers delete without checking, don't carry on that game.
As they probably foresaw, and as barking points out,the debate here has now moved to gagging free speech, and having to "prove" our personal experiences ( which peple believe anyway I think)
Things are moving outside mumsnet at the moment anyway.

Hi Nancy there are threads I find boring too, I just don't read or post on them. I don't comment on the mental state of the posters either. Narky comments say more about the poster

AuntieMaggie · 06/07/2008 11:20

I have to agree with Nancy that the whole steiner debate is getting boring now.

I'm not either for or against steiner schools, and it has been interesting to read some of your experiences but there seems to be a lot of assumption that these experiences are the norm and some scare-mongering against them. I'm sure that for every MNer that posts a negativ e experience on here there are hundreds that don't that have positive things to say about it.

I think people should just accept like many other things it's not for everyone.

I remain openminded about it especially as I know a few professional people in large companies that went to a steiner school and it doesn't seem to have done them any harm!

nkf · 06/07/2008 11:22

That was a long post.

northernrefugee39 · 06/07/2008 11:47

I find it amusing how many people find the Steiner discussion boring and feel bound to comment.
It's not compulsory you know

AuntieMaggie, the main point I and other posters are trying to get accross is that the schools reccruit to their pseudo religion/so called cult through deceptive means.
I also know many people who have come through the system very well too, but I hazard a guess this is in spite of their Steiner education, not because of it.

I've never doubted there are good things about the schools( that's why we chose it).
It wasn't until we began to get too near the bone for the school's likeing, and asking questions, that many things made sense.

And I'm also fairly certain that most of the people who go through the system don't have a clue about the esoteric beliefs the entire system hinges on.
All I'm asking for is honesty and openness, and being able to talk freely without gagging.

northernrefugee39 · 07/07/2008 16:27

Mumsnet toweres have deleted the last thread, the whole lot.
WHY?

When I see artcles like this
Hereford Steiner academy who are receiveing £16 million pounds of government money, for a school of 300 or so, when other schools in the srea are being closed, and the cademy isn't serving the disadvantaged children ion the area anyay, it makes me very very cross.
Why should a pseudo religious cult get this money?

barking · 07/07/2008 19:58

What???

OP posts:
northernrefugee39 · 07/07/2008 20:04

What to what Barking? The third Steiner thread being deleted or the £16 million?

barking · 07/07/2008 20:11

Both

I've started another thread, I just want to know what on earth is going on

OP posts:
Turniphead1 · 07/07/2008 20:13

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

northernrefugee39 · 07/07/2008 20:34

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn