Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Education

Join the discussion on our Education forum.

For anyone wanting to know about Steiner Waldorf schools but are now too afraid to ask.....

90 replies

barking · 03/07/2008 19:25

The article I have posted below was linked to the other week on the steiner thread 3 and as a result it would appear Thebee has managed to spook mumnet into banning:

Zzooey
PeteK
DianaW
PowerofJoy
Easeonline

Myself and Northernrefugee have asked repeatedly why but have had no clear reply other than talk of a 'crusade' which is the very same word Thebee (Sune Nordwall) has used in the page below.

I have asked about the possibility of taking out liability insurance so myself and others are able to speak truthfully and freely on a subject we feel strongly about.

I don't understand how other members of mumsnet are allowed to speak only on one topic and not be banned, one recent example is the Alphamummy thread.

Neither do I understand why we have had no response to our request to have these people reinstated when other posters on mumsnet have been allowed to come back for far more serious crimes. All we have ever done is speak the truth.

I find it so disappointing that for anyone interested in alternative/progressive/natural education will no longer have access to these threads as much of the information and our experiences have been deleted from the threads.

It would appear that mumsnet believes a 58 year old childless man who seems to have dedicated the last 10 years of his life into controlling information on the web about steiner/waldorf/anthoposphy. I believe the article below is a set up to provoke a big reaction from both mumnet and the fellow posters that were banned.

Can someone please be kind enough to explain what the ban is about and how we can get this very important subject back up and running please.

The article is below, so you can make your own mind up:

From www.thebee.se/comments/MN.html

Some comments on discussions of Steiner Waldorf education at Mumsnet
Since 2007, "Northernrefugee39", an intense talkative professed atheist, socialist and republican, and former Steiner Waldorf mother in the U.K, with very little patience for what she thinks are "boring" discussions, has been pursuing a persistent anti Steiner school crusade at Mumsnet.

She has posted in all threads she has found where she has been able to find any possibility to express her antipathy towards Steiner Waldorf education, from threads having nothing to do as such with Steiner Waldorf education, to threads discussing Steiner Waldorf education in general, to all discussions of one or other specific waldorf school in the U.K.

INTERNET TROLLING CAMPAIGN

When she later this year has tried to pursue her anti-Waldorf crusade also in other parenting forums on the net, she has been less successful and has been banned for trolling at a number of them.

This is the case at the Green Parent forum, where she, like at Mumsnet, tried to pursue her anti-Waldorf crusade in all Waldorf threads she could find, but soon was banned for her aggressive trolling. The BBC parenting forum did not like her aggressive anti-Steiner trolling either but deleted a number of her postings and banned her from further discussions. When she has pursued a similar anti-Steiner trolling campaign at Mothering in the U.S., she has been banned from further participation in the Waldorf discussions there too.

WC

In support of her anti-Waldorf trolling crusade at Mumsnet she has been joined by some fellow members of an anti-Waldorf mailing list in English on the net, "waldorf critics" (WC), where she participates.

The list is owned by the secretary since long of a small anti-Waldorf fringe group in California, "PLANS Inc.", much rooted in his efforts since the end of the 1980s to actively spread secular humanism in the San Francisco Bay Area.

When the large web portal DMOZ in 2001 looked at the site of the group, it decided that it did not qualify and deleted it from its Waldorf category as "informational" source on Steiner Waldorf education.

After Altavista looked closer at the site of the group two years later, in 2003, it took the drastic action to complertely delete all links to it from its web index as "informational" site on Steiner Waldorf education and refused to publish any sponsored ad from overture.com for searches on "waldorf", "waldorf education", and "Rudolf Steiner", regardless of their origin, to get rid of the ads for PLANS for the searches..

In contrast to this judgement by DMOZ and Altavista of the site as "informational" source on Steiner Waldorf education, Northernrefugee39 in the discussions at Mumsnet repeatedly recommends its disinformation on Steiner Waldorf education as "information" on Waldorf education.

For a description of the group, see here.

For a shorter introductory description of the origin, nature, history and argumentation of the group, that started its anti-Waldorf campaign ten years ago supporting allegations that "Waldorf schools teach the pupils witchcraft", see Americans for Waldorf Education

For a summary on the group and its activities the last ten years, see Americans for Waldorf Education too.

The main anti-Waldorf argumentation of Northernrefugee39 and other waldorf critics in the thread that they occupy at Mumsnet - and where they bully everyone who does not agree with them - is that Steiner Waldorf schools don't give children a good education.

WORLD CONSPIRACY MYTH...

Instead they - according to Northernrefugee39 - in secret indoctrinate the pupils with anthroposophy, the spiritually oriented philosophy that constitutes the general basis of Waldorf education, with the goal - according to Northern - of making them into a "spiritually superior group".

Her argument is part of a slightly paranoid, since long cultivated and published myth by the WC-group - an "Anthroposophical World Conspiracy" myth. According to the myth, the secret goal of Steiner Waldorf education - not told to the parents - is to train the future rulers of the world, which seems to stand in contrast to the alleged failure of the schools to even teach the pupils to read and write properly ...

For an introduction to actual Waldorf education and how it is related to anthroposophy, see Waldorf Answers.

For a more detailed description of Waldorf education, see the Wikipedia article on the subject.

The arguments by "critics" of Steiner Waldorf education at Mumsnet is based much on the slower way the pupils during the first grades at the schools are brought from a play stage of childhood over stories in different forms, from myths to nature stories, up to the present time, and the slower way first writing and then reading is taught at Waldorf schools during the first years at school, which at Waldorf schools start for the children at age 7, and the way they learn reading more at their own pace without pressure, at times only reading fully without effort at age 10 or 11.

The contrast is especially great during the earlier years at Steiner Waldorf schools in relation to how reading is taught, not least in schools in the U.K., where primary school education is compulsory already from age 5, and children most commonly enter reception class at age 4 in the academic year in which they will reach their 5th birthday.

The suspicion and allegation by critics is that Steiner Waldorf schools therefore do not give the pupils a good education but - from a marked outspoken atheist perspective - are a sort of covert religious parochial schools, who don't through eight or twelve years give their pupils a good education but instead indoctrinate them with anthroposophy. This is contradicted by among other things the numerous parents, who through the years have chosen a Waldorf school for their children, and a number of the pupils who have gone there. (At present there exist 900+ Steiner Waldorf schools incl. adult education, world wide)

ACTUAL WALDORF PARENTS AND PUPILS

To the group of the numerous present or former Steiner Waldorf parents belong among other Helmut Kohl, former German Chancellor, Heinz Galinski, Auschwitz survivor and former President of the Central Jewish Council in Germany, Karl Otto Pöhl, former President of German Federal Bank for nine years, Walter Riester, former German Minister of Labour, Otto Schily, former German Minister of the Interior and President by Seniority of German Federal Parliament, Hans-Dietrich Genscher, former German Minister of Foreign Affairs, Eugen Wagner, former Senator, Hamburg Ernst-Jörg von Studnitz, former German Ambassador to Russia, Knut Frydenlund, former Norwegian Minister of Foreign Affairs, Thorvald Stoltenberg, former Norwegian Minister of Foreign Affairs, Jonas Gahr Støre, present Norwegian Minister of Foreign Affairs.

Among former Waldorf parents one also finds Wolfgang Sauer, former President of Volkswagen in Brasil, Erwin Neher, Nobel Laureate in medicine 1991, Gilbert M. Grosvenor (1875-1966), President & Chairman, National Geographic Society, Clifford Stoll, astronomer, co-developer of the Internet, Russell Schweickart, Apollo 9 astronaut, NASA Astronaut Technical Advisor, California Energy Commission, Eric Utne, founder of, publisher, and former editor-in-chief of Utne Reader (now Waldorf teacher), Mikhail Baryshnikov, well known Russian ballet dancer and actor, Robert Jungk, Austrian writer and journalist, Harvey Keitel, Jessica Lange and Sam Shepard, George Lucas, (director, Star Wars), Clint Eastwood and Frances Fisher, André Previn, conductor, composer, pianist, Rosie O'Donnell, comedian, television talk show host, author, 11 times Emmy Award winner, Liv Ullmann and Ingmar Bergman.

To the group of former Waldorf pupils belong the former Presidential candidate John Kerry and his sister Diana (implied by Diana Kerry in an interview in der Tagesspiegel in 2004 about the time they spent in Berlin in the 1950's, when their father worked there as diplomat at the American Consulate), Kenneth Chenault, former President and present Chief Executive Officer of American Express, Jens Stoltenberg, Prime Minister of Norway, Andreas Carlgren, Swedish Minister for the Environment, Prof. Dr. Wolfram Achtnich, plant cultivation scientist, Scott Boman, American libertarian politician, Mosemarie Boyd, President & CEO of "American Women Presidents", Prof. Dr. Wolf-Christian Dullo, Oceanographer, Konrad Schily, Member of the German Parliament; founder and former President of University Witten-Herdecke, Andreas Schleicher, Inventor of the Programme for International Student Assessment, Head of the Indicators and Analysis Division (Directorate for Education) OECD, Karl Matthäus Schmidt, CEO of quirin bank (a German bank specialized in Private Banking, Corporate Banking and Business Process Outsourcing).

Other former Waldorf pupils are Freimut Duve, politician and journalist; former member of German Parliament, Olaf Feldmann, former member of the German Parliament, Pekka Haavisto, member of the Finnish Parliament, former Finnish Minister of Environment, Hans-Peter Lehmann, former director of the State Opera in Hannover, Victor Navasky, Professor of journalism, Columbia University, former editor and now publisher emeritus of "The Nation", Kristen Nygaard, Professor of informatics, co-inventor of object orientated programming, Michael Rogowski, Vice President of the Federal Association of the German Industry "BDI", former President of BDI, Aram Roston, CNN and newspaper reporter, George Hume, BBC journalist and newspaper columnist for Herald Tribune and other British papers, Joern G. Stegen, Diplomat (retired), working with the Council of Europe for 38 years, Oras Tynkkynen, member of the Finnish Parliament, Linn Ullmann, internationally acclaimed writer and journalist, daughter of Liv Ullmann and Ingmar Bergman, Jennifer Aniston, winner of Golden Globe, Julianna Margulies, nominated for 6 Golden Globes, Sandra Bullock, screen actress, Rutger Hauer, screen actor, winner of Golden Globe, Michael Ende, one of the most popular and famous German authors of the 20th century ("Momo", "The Neverending Story"), Ari Behn, writer, husband of Princess Märtha Louise of Norway, Barbara Becker, actress, ex-wife of Boris Becker, Timothy Daly, actor, Chris Elliott, screen actor and TV-entertainer, Anna Paquin, actor, Academy Award winner for Best Supporting Actress in "The Piano", to mention a few.

For some more of the many distinguished Waldorf parents and pupils from different walks of life in different countries, see here.

MORE COMMENTS

For some comments on Waldorf education by some of the Waldorf parents/pupils mentioned above, and some others, like Selma Lagerlöf, 1909 Swedish Nobel Literature Laureate, Albert Schweizer, 1952 Nobel Peace Laureate, Stefan Zweig (1881-1942), author, and Andrei Tarkovsky (1932-1986), Russian film director (Solaris, Stalker, Nostalghia, The Sacrifice), see the site of Waldorf Answers that also addresses a number of the myths about Waldorf education cultivated in the Mumsnet discussions.

The comments mentioned and the numerous Waldorf parents who have chosen a Waldorf education for their children through the 20th century world wide - clearly only a very small sample is mentioned above - put what Northernrefugee39 (and her fellow companeros from the mailing list of the WC anti-Waldorf fringe group) write at Mumsnet in a sobering perspective.

OP posts:
barking · 03/07/2008 21:48

Nighbynight, thank you for posting that. I have spent far too much time on steiner threads recently, but I really take offence to not being believed over Sune.

He searches the internet daily for any negative steiner press. Try and start up a thead on a chat forum and wait....

That is why I'm still here I guess, I hate not being believed when I've experienced first hand something so dangerous, and now I don't even have the safety of mumsnet to talk about it.

When I talk about danger I'm talking about a violent attack on my child by another child in a small room full of parents including a teacher. Nobody responded, can you imagine? Noone comforting your child,
Noone comforting the parent,
Nobody telling the child who hit it is wrong
Everyone carried on sewing their gnome welly holders
Then later being told it was our karma

Can you understand why I am still here talking about this?

OP posts:
shirleyghostman · 03/07/2008 21:56

Barking - yes I can understand. I am going through a similar feeling to what you have and are going through.(albeit in a different format - non Steiner BTW)

barking · 03/07/2008 21:58

ShirleyGhostman - Yes I have and I thought I had posted the oppositions side in my original post, the article belongs to Sune Nordwall.

In hindsight he should have been banned much earlier when it was made evident he had the agenda of promoting his websites. I guess the debate wouldn't have been so colourful shall we say! But it definately derailed the conversations away from real parents experiences as mumsnet's motto says: 'by parents for parents' .

OP posts:
shirleyghostman · 03/07/2008 22:04

But you didn't counterbalance it with PeteKs rant did you?

I am interested to know what your thoughts are on his email exchange to one of the members of MNHQ? Paying particular attention to the latter part of that link that I posted and then reading his subsequent replies to his fellow comrades!

MmeLindt · 03/07/2008 22:11

Barking
I have no definate stance on this issue, I am sitting rather uncomfortably on the fence. I know that here in Germany the Waldorf schools are seen as lentil-weavery alternative schools, really the opposite of the rightwing racist schools portrayed on the threads here on MN.

A poster such as yourself, who has personal experience of one Waldorf institution should of course be free to share her experiences with other parents on MN.

What I do not agree with is the crusaders (on both sides of the fence) who are using and abusing MN to fight a battle with no winners. The combatants are so firmly entrenched in their beliefs that there is no help or advice for anyone seeking it.

Whatever the truth about Waldorf schools, MNHQ has to protect themselves from threat of litigation. For this reason, the banned posters should not be allowed back on MN.

barking · 03/07/2008 22:23

Shirleyghostman - I have just read the link you posted in full together with his subsequent postings and I am uncomfortable with how he handled his banning, but I can understand it. From how I see it he is very very frustrated at having had no warning.

I am not part of the waldorf critics list, I don't understand how you can link to a private group and have access to read all their posts?

OP posts:
shirleyghostman · 03/07/2008 22:28

No it isn't - google it if you don't believe me.

But then again how do you know it is a private link seeing as you are not a member?

barking · 03/07/2008 22:31

MmeLindt - there has been much worse things said on mumsnet over the years, but from what I now understand it only becomes an issue if someone complains.

So you complained because of the quotes?

OP posts:
MmeLindt · 03/07/2008 22:32

Just had a look at the Waldorf-Critics group, you obviously do not need to be a member.

Put Mumsnet into the Search function then decide if MNHQ did the right thing. There are several rants discussions.

barking · 03/07/2008 22:33

Shirleyghostman - when I click on the link it says 'members only' on the left hand side, yet I can access and click on the posts.

OP posts:
barking · 03/07/2008 22:34

I promise you I am not a member [exasperated emoticon]

OP posts:
leosdad · 03/07/2008 22:42

Am showing my ignorance but what is anthroposophy?

shirleyghostman · 03/07/2008 22:47

What I find strange is that you say you are not a member yet you claim it is a private area.

MmeLindt · 03/07/2008 22:47

I cannot say exactly what I wrote to MNHQ, it was quite some time ago. I expressed my concern that MN was leaving themselves open to a lawsuit. There was a comment about racism. The names of the German politicians Otto Schily (former Home Secretary) and Joshka Fischer (former Secretary of State) were mentioned.

So, yes there was at least one complaint about the threads, not about a specific post but about the general tone of the debate and the danger of legal action.

shirleyghostman · 03/07/2008 22:49

leosdad - blimey where to begin, best thing to do is to google it - PRO v ANTI and then search steiner via mumsnet and other forums out there.

catinthehat · 03/07/2008 22:56

ShirleyG, doesn't posting that link on this site present a legal target over here as well? (Well worth a read by the way)

shirleyghostman · 03/07/2008 23:05

Not sure but having read the link and the fact that mumsnet agreed to allow the email to be posted elsewhere and the other forum is easily googled and open I reckon it is in the public domain.

barking · 03/07/2008 23:07

Shirleyghostman - when I click on the link on the left hand side it says 'members only' I don't know if it's private, but just reading the posts I would have thougth the people posting on them would have thought this private - even though Pete alludes to making some of these emails public.

OP posts:
shirleyghostman · 03/07/2008 23:14

barking it is not set to private believe me.

Angel178 · 04/07/2008 03:02

I think they were banned because they told the truth. I guess that is not allowed on here...(rolly eyes)

It is sad to me because I come here for advise and some information. I didn't realize that if people tell me the truth, they get silenced

What kind of site is this? I'll make sure to inform all of my parent friends......not to visit here....

Buda · 04/07/2008 03:35

What kind of site is this Angel? It is a parenting site set up by two women. Both of whom went through a nasty legal action last year and if it had gone against them they were at risk of losing their homes. They are two women with families.

So if the Steiner debate on here has started to mean that they are receiving any threats of legal action against them then I can understand why they would ban people who ONLY post on Steiner threads and seem to be part of a wider campaign against Steiner. They simply do not want to risk a repeat of what happened last year.

I have great sympathy for anyone who has had a bad experience with Steiner (or any school) but I do think that here is not the place to enter into the sort of debates it seems to generate.

By all means continue to post about your experiences but please do not attack MNHQ if they try to protect themselves and this site from legal action.

barking · 04/07/2008 07:14

Buda - given what happened with gf I can understand why their are big concerns with these threads.

But the difference here is not what has been written in the threads (parent's genuine experiences) , it's what has been written outside of it directly to MNHQ.

After reading the whole link that Shirley posted last night I understand why mn wouldn't reinstate Pete.

But I don't understand why the others have been banned and would still like to ask if they are able to come back.

Shirleyghostman - ok I have now googled and see that you are right regarding waldorf critics being a public discussion group - sorry.
It just seems odd that there are peoples real names on the web for all to see. I wouldn't want Sune and co to be able to see my real name.

OP posts:
northernrefugee39 · 04/07/2008 11:29

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

PootyApplewater · 04/07/2008 11:38

MmeLindt, I too reported the Steiner threads to MNHQ, to be told the same thing - they were monitoring them.

I have no particular view one way or the other, but the threads made very troubling reading.

I feel it is extremely unfair if one set of posters have been banned, whilst TheBee and his supporters are still allowed to post.

Their comments came across as being extremely passive aggressive, and quite threatening at times, imo.

I would be interested in MNHQ's reasoning for banning some posters and not others.

northernrefugee39 · 04/07/2008 11:45

MmeLindt If you have seen or read Steiner on the subject of racial hierarchy and spiritual superiority, you might think it was racist.
I'm not going into any of that argument now! It's ok!
I'll only say, that while my kids were there rthere were first of all , oblique but strange comments made, and one of my kids was singled out to play a dark dwarf in a play, when the other girls were queens princesses and attendants. My husband has Jewish / Asian roots, our children were dark compared to most of the kids at the school, the teacher had written the play herself, with lots of phrases like golden hair and beauty. The dwarf was like the demon in the play, and taunted and mocked. It was really really horrid.
My daughter was distraught, and when I rang the teacher to ask if she could at least wear a dress or something, she went totally beserk- absolutey crazy. I put the phone down and said we'd have to talk later , and she rang 6 times more- shouting and justifying why at me- my daughter answered on one occasion and she didn't even realise, just went on ranting...... In my daughter's work book used during the period during the play she had written "Dwarves are dark and ugly.They live underground. Everybody hates them"
Now, I'm not saying whether this was racially inspired. It was a cruel act on a human level for a young child. There were plenty of boys to play the part.
It just made me think when I read Steiner's views on race. I also know of people who are dark skinned, whose children left, and the teacher wrote a story about a little dark child not being ready to play in the garden with the blond princes. Not joking.
There are things like this going on in these schools.
Coupled with the writing on race, I think you might have questioned it.

Swipe left for the next trending thread