Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Education

Join the discussion on our Education forum.

Jason Arday, Cambridge Plagiarist, thread two

1000 replies

Angeruish · 08/08/2026 20:39

We are nearing our 1000-post limit on the original thread:
https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/education/5561878-jason-arday-cambridge-plagiarist?reply=153910946

I have now removed the question mark after "plagiarist".

I can't believe the sequel will be as good as the original, but you never know...

Jason Arday, Cambridge Plagiarist? | Mumsnet

I’m surprised to be the first to mention this, but what do people think about Jason Arday, the Cambridge professor accused of plagiarism, and the medi...

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/education/5561878-jason-arday-cambridge-plagiarist?reply=153910946

OP posts:
Thread gallery
65
MeetMeOnTheCorner · 19/08/2026 13:46

@MrPrettyDamnCosmicThanks. Hope my summary was fair. It was intended to be.

KnottyAuty · 19/08/2026 13:48

MrPrettyDamnCosmic · 19/08/2026 11:15

I wonder if this pattern had happened at any of the other universities?

He didn't spend more than 18 months in any job so not even time to supervise a single PhD. My suspicion is that he got continually promoted upwards to get rid of him once they realised that despite any personal qualities how useless he was at actually doing the job he was hired for.

His own PhD was completed in a record 2.5 years and with only 1 supervision. He was “cleared” of plagiarism because the uni that investigated said poor scholarship was down to lack of supervision. It’s not the best endorsement is it?

MrPrettyDamnCosmic · 19/08/2026 13:52

KnottyAuty · 19/08/2026 13:48

His own PhD was completed in a record 2.5 years and with only 1 supervision. He was “cleared” of plagiarism because the uni that investigated said poor scholarship was down to lack of supervision. It’s not the best endorsement is it?

Edited

His own PhD was completed in a record 2.5 years and with only 1 supervision.

Phil Vickerman his PhD supervisor boasts of failing all his GCSEs except English staying on at school a further year & failing all the resits.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phil_Vickerman

KnottyAuty · 19/08/2026 13:54

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 19/08/2026 11:31

@N0tAnAcadem1c I won’t write an essay on the Sarah Ditum comment but basically she talks about claims in his book that are false: some clearly very exaggerated claims that were rejected by the publisher and a childish brazenness to his exaggeration and inventions. She mentions that a journalist at the Guardian also investigated Arday’s harassment claims and another one who wrote about him exploiting autism to cover his actions .

She says he had a single 1:1 supervision during his PhD at LJMU. Arday also had reported a journalist from the THE to the police. Carter Ruck defamation lawyers were used by Arday and the THE backed off from asking further questions. She feels there was some racism in the agenda of a few, but had everything been out in the open and truthful, and dealt with appropriately, there would have been limited interest.

She lists who was harmed by his self-mythologising: academics, early career lecturers, Sen families, students. She had also reviewed his book and talks about his celebrity and media rounds when he was appointed. Most academics don’t get do this. She raised doubts when she reviewed the book and feels he chose the spotlight. She’s aware of the media storm and feels he’s now been cast as a martyr. She believes the issues raised by numerous people should have been dealt with earlier by various institutions and he should never have been promoted as a somebody and the book should never have been published. She thinks Arday wanted his lies to be the truth but the unluckiest thing that ever happened to him was that he was successful in getting what he wanted and thought he deserved.

Hope that’s a good summary.

Lovely summary of my understanding of the situation

Ive yet to read the article because instead I listened to a lot of his talks to hear it from him direct. As a result im mystified by the racism claims - JA told the most amazing audacious lies Ive ever heard! Was simultaneously extremely charming!

SevenYellowHammers · 19/08/2026 13:55

MissyGirlie · 19/08/2026 10:18

Yes, and not talking about this episode will ensure that absolutely is learned from it.

It will fade. In about 5 months they’ll be two inches in the press saying that JA had no case to answer re PhD and other accusations were too insubstantial to investigate. And Jan Moir, Richard Littlejohn et all will swoop on their next victim.

MrPrettyDamnCosmic · 19/08/2026 14:06

SevenYellowHammers · 19/08/2026 13:55

It will fade. In about 5 months they’ll be two inches in the press saying that JA had no case to answer re PhD and other accusations were too insubstantial to investigate. And Jan Moir, Richard Littlejohn et all will swoop on their next victim.

Unfortunately for Arday's legacy his autobiography "Great and Unfortunate Things" is published next week. It's going to be scoured for porkies like his claim that he began a job in 2017 as head of the sports department at "a university in London", but his position was cut for financial reasons on his second day. Why didn't his ghostwriter say "Hang on a minute Jason. Do you have any evidence to support that claim?"

www.amazon.co.uk/Great-Unfortunate-Things-Jason-Arday/dp/1398542741/

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 19/08/2026 14:27

@MrPrettyDamnCosmic There’s evidence to suggest some of his wilder fantasies were left out of the book but others were left in. Many more people beyond ghostwriters see the contents of a book prior to publication.

Wild theory here: how much did they care about the truth? Would the book sell well because it had very questionable stories in it?

MissyGirlie · 19/08/2026 14:43

SevenYellowHammers · 19/08/2026 13:55

It will fade. In about 5 months they’ll be two inches in the press saying that JA had no case to answer re PhD and other accusations were too insubstantial to investigate. And Jan Moir, Richard Littlejohn et all will swoop on their next victim.

You seem very confident.
I'm hoping for a proper review of processes so that this can't happen again.

KnottyAuty · 19/08/2026 14:53

Emyj15 · 19/08/2026 11:59

Lots of allegations but not any real factual evidence at this stage. Suspect more details will be known after the completed investigation.

If there were complaints at other universities then I'm surprised Cambridge wouldn't have been aware of them.

Surely Cambridge would know that employing Arday would come with scrutiny. It's not like he's the first black person to kill themselves after being accused of exaggerating their CV and accomplishments based on hounding by the media.

Remember we are looking at this in hindsight with loads of additional contextual evidence they didn’t have when they hired him and werent tracking live as it built up to it’s collection of impossible “facts”.

They had his CV, references (does anyone bother to check?) and his academic output. He was already a professor so they wouldn’t bother checking his early work and presumably his later stuff read ok because he’d copied a lot of it m.

When David Harris raised concerns about this body of work it was all quietly corrected in 2023. Cambridge probably thought it had done due diligence - but they remained in the dark about his problematic back story. It’s that which mostly fueled the media/social media storm.

In particular when the Guardian had to publish an article which expressed doubt - thats when the left turned on him - which is the same group which then reverse ferreted and are shouting racism when he died. À la James O’Brien.

Marchesman · 19/08/2026 15:07

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 19/08/2026 13:44

@Marchesman The outcomes for private school pupils might well reflect only the absolute elite are now the only ones who get it! The number of them getting a 2:1 has reduced because this cohort have been removed. Not so from other schools.

Sorry. I don't understand your point.

KnottyAuty · 19/08/2026 15:11

MrPrettyDamnCosmic · 19/08/2026 13:52

His own PhD was completed in a record 2.5 years and with only 1 supervision.

Phil Vickerman his PhD supervisor boasts of failing all his GCSEs except English staying on at school a further year & failing all the resits.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phil_Vickerman

Edited

To be fair to Phil he was the only one of the 3 allocated supervisors to get involved (by phone and text and one meeting)...the other two didn't bother at all! No wonder the investigation didn't blame Jason for his poor thesis/referencing

Lalgarh · 19/08/2026 15:15

The latest position of the belated Team Arday is to claim the journalists who looked into his case and found his claims wanting "aren't really black" or using slavery analogies for writing something they don't agree with

https://nitter.net/kenanmalik/status/2090032297030341043#m

KnottyAuty · 19/08/2026 15:35

MrPrettyDamnCosmic · 19/08/2026 14:06

Unfortunately for Arday's legacy his autobiography "Great and Unfortunate Things" is published next week. It's going to be scoured for porkies like his claim that he began a job in 2017 as head of the sports department at "a university in London", but his position was cut for financial reasons on his second day. Why didn't his ghostwriter say "Hang on a minute Jason. Do you have any evidence to support that claim?"

www.amazon.co.uk/Great-Unfortunate-Things-Jason-Arday/dp/1398542741/

That is odd. He claims an awful lot was happening 2016-2018.

In 2016 He was working as a senior lecturer in PE at Leeds Beckett.

There is a youtube interview at Durham just before he leaves for Glasgow dating from 2021. In it JA talks about qualifying as a councillor in mental health mid 2019 via a Birkbeck 3 year part time masters. So that would in theory have been ongoing 2016-2019. Of course we now know he never studied at Birkbeck so we can discount this, but the other parts seem slightly more likely...

During 2017 we definitely know he started the Black Vote work shadowing thing with MP Rosena Allin-Khan which was in addition to employment and ran until Sept 2018. In April 2018 he was giving a Keynote at a BME conference at UCL but doesn't have a uni name on the slides. So I had assumed he had to leave Leeds sometime in 2017 although this is not specifically mentioned in any talks or articles.

2018 is very busy - and really looks like the point where he decides to go for it in academia - after a failed attempt at being elected in Croydon as a labour councillor in May, he publishes various academic papers then gets a job at Roehampton around August 2018 which lasts until April/May2019 before he moved to Durham. I think Roehampton is where some students who asked for advice on their work were told to consider their white priviledge. If that is true that is shocking/newsworthy in its own right!

I'd never heard of the 2017 Head of Sports Dept job in London - might this be a muddle with dates and be Roehampton from 2018?

ETA I haven't read any of the book - this is all based on JA's own claims or documented evidence so I don't know how/whether it all fits with the book timeline

KnottyAuty · 19/08/2026 15:47

Apologies - just checked the UCL conference notes again. JA's slides don't give a uni name but the conference blurb attributes him to Roehampton. So it is likely that he moved their in late 2017 and that is what is referred to in the book

ETA of course that doesn't tally with his position being axed on Day 2 for financial reasons! But it does tag him to London that year at least?!

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 19/08/2026 16:45

@KnottyAuty Ir probably doesn’t. That’s the point.

SevenYellowHammers · 19/08/2026 16:46

MissyGirlie · 19/08/2026 14:43

You seem very confident.
I'm hoping for a proper review of processes so that this can't happen again.

I’d like to be proven wrong. But the fact that these people are in post after Steven Gateley and Lucy Meadows doesn’t fill me with confidence!

KnottyAuty · 19/08/2026 17:05

SevenYellowHammers · 19/08/2026 16:46

I’d like to be proven wrong. But the fact that these people are in post after Steven Gateley and Lucy Meadows doesn’t fill me with confidence!

Sorry I am not following your line of thought. Are they also linked to Cambridge?

Marchesman · 19/08/2026 17:38

@KnottyAuty
His appointment cannot be excused by the hindsight argument. The university announced the news online with this headline: "The renowned sociologist, Jason Arday, is to become a professor at the University of Cambridge: the latest chapter in a remarkable academic career, which began after he overcame illiteracy in his late teens."

It may not be usual to read the early work of academics appointed at this level, but his later work was not impressive, Any normal person reading that headline, and knowing that they were about to appoint a PE teacher from Twickenham university to a professorial chair at (what had been) one of the top universities in the world, would think his PhD might be worth a read.

The fact that they did not read it, or they did and thought it was terrific and still went ahead, can only be explained if they already had an image in their heads of the banner across the news article which reads: "Cambridge has achieved some notable gains in attempting to diversify the landscape, but there is so much more to be done"

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 19/08/2026 18:20

@Marchesman Or Cambridge has an agenda: never mind the quality - feel the width” if you know the saying. In other words let’s overlook quality because we have ticked a lot of boxes that mean more to us.

Lalgarh · 19/08/2026 18:58

Sam Kriss is a dreadful person, but unfortunately he has this insight:

https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-carrion-eaters

The actual problem is much vaster. Right now, the entire British university sector is kept afloat by roughly three quarters of a million international students. They’re here because Tsinghua is hard to get into and Cambridge isn’t, and we’re happy to have them. We’ll let them exist in an unofficial parallel system, where they get to take lectures in a language they barely understand and cheat on an industrial scale, because the last thing we want is to scare away the money. For the moment it works, bosses in Shenzhen are still impressed by an international degree. It won’t last forever. You can only debase the coinage so long before people start noticing; eventually the halls that nurtured Newton and Wittgenstein will rank alongside the Changchun Institute of Canned Food Technologies. But the domestic students are the same. Have you been in a university lecture theatre lately? Go: it’s fine, everyone’ll just assume you’re a particularly unfortunate-looking mature student. Sit at the back. At the far end of the room there’s a little person trying to talk about textuality, performance, and production; meanwhile the space in between is a glowing, rippling sea of laptop screens. Every single one of these students is scrolling through pictures of jumpsuits on Shein. When they need to submit an essay they get ChatGPT to print one out for them. And frankly, the academics aren’t any different themselves. Their main function is research: investigating the world, finding interesting new facts or startling new interpretations, and writing them down so other people can be interested and surprised by them too. And a lot of research does take place. A constant stream of high-quality world-leading papers, all duly rubber-stamped under the Research Excellence Framework, all of it totally meaningless dreck. In Arday’s field of education studies, something like fifty thousand papers are published every year. You could sit down every day from nine in the morning to nine at night and do nothing but read high-quality research in education studies, and it would take you eight years to get through a single year’s output. But these texts don’t exist to be read. They exist to drive research grants, so the department can produce even more texts for no one to read, more and more, filling every crevice with useless words.

It is genuinely deranged, in this situation, to start ginning up a moral panic over academic standards. We’re in November 1918 and you’re trying to have a Prussian infantryman whipped for not shining his boots. It’s over; the academy is a literate institution marooned in a postliterate world, governed and staffed by people who no longer have anything to do with whatever way of being these places were once built to protect. They’re all form-fillers, generating excellence in predictable increments. They don’t know how to read. Which is how an institution like Cambridge could hire a man like Jason Arday, who left a grammatical error in the title of his dissertation. Not because he was black, and not because of his purported disability, but because there was probably no one on the hiring committee who had actually bothered to read his work. Just check his citation numbers. Why not have a professor who, by his own account, takes an hour to read a single page of text? In a fully literate institution that would be disqualifying. Not everyone has to be an academic; it has nothing to do with your worth as a human being, but maybe, in light of your disability, this particular line of work isn’t for you. In the postliterate university it’s no impediment at all. Welcome; you’ll fit right in.

The carrion-eaters

What we did to Jason Arday

https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-carrion-eaters

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 19/08/2026 19:22

@Lalgarh Another fantasist? My DD1 spent some time at a uni in Italy. The highest ranked state one. In lectures she observed students chatting, eating and snogging. Laptop use might be seen as an improvement and how does he look at ALL the screens? Hyperbole in big doses in his observations I think!

CousinBette · 19/08/2026 19:24

Lalgarh · 19/08/2026 18:58

Sam Kriss is a dreadful person, but unfortunately he has this insight:

https://samkriss.substack.com/p/the-carrion-eaters

The actual problem is much vaster. Right now, the entire British university sector is kept afloat by roughly three quarters of a million international students. They’re here because Tsinghua is hard to get into and Cambridge isn’t, and we’re happy to have them. We’ll let them exist in an unofficial parallel system, where they get to take lectures in a language they barely understand and cheat on an industrial scale, because the last thing we want is to scare away the money. For the moment it works, bosses in Shenzhen are still impressed by an international degree. It won’t last forever. You can only debase the coinage so long before people start noticing; eventually the halls that nurtured Newton and Wittgenstein will rank alongside the Changchun Institute of Canned Food Technologies. But the domestic students are the same. Have you been in a university lecture theatre lately? Go: it’s fine, everyone’ll just assume you’re a particularly unfortunate-looking mature student. Sit at the back. At the far end of the room there’s a little person trying to talk about textuality, performance, and production; meanwhile the space in between is a glowing, rippling sea of laptop screens. Every single one of these students is scrolling through pictures of jumpsuits on Shein. When they need to submit an essay they get ChatGPT to print one out for them. And frankly, the academics aren’t any different themselves. Their main function is research: investigating the world, finding interesting new facts or startling new interpretations, and writing them down so other people can be interested and surprised by them too. And a lot of research does take place. A constant stream of high-quality world-leading papers, all duly rubber-stamped under the Research Excellence Framework, all of it totally meaningless dreck. In Arday’s field of education studies, something like fifty thousand papers are published every year. You could sit down every day from nine in the morning to nine at night and do nothing but read high-quality research in education studies, and it would take you eight years to get through a single year’s output. But these texts don’t exist to be read. They exist to drive research grants, so the department can produce even more texts for no one to read, more and more, filling every crevice with useless words.

It is genuinely deranged, in this situation, to start ginning up a moral panic over academic standards. We’re in November 1918 and you’re trying to have a Prussian infantryman whipped for not shining his boots. It’s over; the academy is a literate institution marooned in a postliterate world, governed and staffed by people who no longer have anything to do with whatever way of being these places were once built to protect. They’re all form-fillers, generating excellence in predictable increments. They don’t know how to read. Which is how an institution like Cambridge could hire a man like Jason Arday, who left a grammatical error in the title of his dissertation. Not because he was black, and not because of his purported disability, but because there was probably no one on the hiring committee who had actually bothered to read his work. Just check his citation numbers. Why not have a professor who, by his own account, takes an hour to read a single page of text? In a fully literate institution that would be disqualifying. Not everyone has to be an academic; it has nothing to do with your worth as a human being, but maybe, in light of your disability, this particular line of work isn’t for you. In the postliterate university it’s no impediment at all. Welcome; you’ll fit right in.

Bloody hell. Absolutely spot on.

MeetMeOnTheCorner · 19/08/2026 19:34

@CousinBette I don’t think half of that is accurate. It’s opinion. International students are not all here because other unis are hard to get into. Some are but others are definitely not. So that rubbish before he gets onto anything else.

Emyj15 · 19/08/2026 19:54

KnottyAuty · 19/08/2026 14:53

Remember we are looking at this in hindsight with loads of additional contextual evidence they didn’t have when they hired him and werent tracking live as it built up to it’s collection of impossible “facts”.

They had his CV, references (does anyone bother to check?) and his academic output. He was already a professor so they wouldn’t bother checking his early work and presumably his later stuff read ok because he’d copied a lot of it m.

When David Harris raised concerns about this body of work it was all quietly corrected in 2023. Cambridge probably thought it had done due diligence - but they remained in the dark about his problematic back story. It’s that which mostly fueled the media/social media storm.

In particular when the Guardian had to publish an article which expressed doubt - thats when the left turned on him - which is the same group which then reverse ferreted and are shouting racism when he died. À la James O’Brien.

The suggestion is anyone who read his work or listened to his talks would quickly realise that he wasn't up to the job. It's therefore a struggle to understand how nobody who hired him at Glasgow, Durham or Cambridge worked it out.

I'm not sure I buy into the argument that they were all so desperate for diversity they simply hired any black guy with good backstory even though it was pretty obvious he was lying.

For me either Arday was more capable than some are admitting or maybe some departments at Cambridge aren't as elite as some would like to believe

Aluna · 19/08/2026 20:25

Emyj15 · 19/08/2026 19:54

The suggestion is anyone who read his work or listened to his talks would quickly realise that he wasn't up to the job. It's therefore a struggle to understand how nobody who hired him at Glasgow, Durham or Cambridge worked it out.

I'm not sure I buy into the argument that they were all so desperate for diversity they simply hired any black guy with good backstory even though it was pretty obvious he was lying.

For me either Arday was more capable than some are admitting or maybe some departments at Cambridge aren't as elite as some would like to believe

He may well not have stood out from other mediocre academics.

Anyone who’s been to Cambridge knows how poor some of the lecturers are.

There are too many people who choose academe because they’re introverted loners happiest with books and no real interest in teaching. Or their teaching’s ok but their research is average.

Equally, there are 100s of Ardays across the country with insufficiently scrutinised PhDs from ex polys, scant achievements and a lot of hot air.

The issue is endemic, so why kick Arday particular to death.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.