Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Education

Join the discussion on our Education forum.

Tunbridge Wells Preps, Holmewood House, The Mead, Rose Hill Up to Date Thoughts...

28 replies

TWCurious · 20/06/2025 14:24

Hi all
We are looking to move to Tunbridge Wells in the next year and I'm hoping for some up to date thoughts on local prep schools. Any up to date info on Holmewood House and The Mead would be very much appreciated. We haven't ruled Rose Hill out completely but we've heard some quite unsettling rumours via friends of friends about viability and the popularity of the Head - as in she's really not! However, I'm keeping an open mind.
My children are currently in Reception, Year 1 and Year 3.
Many thanks in advance.
Edited

OP posts:
Pip290 · 24/06/2025 15:14

I just wrote a very similar response so I hope you don't mind me copying and pasting!

We have several friends/family members with children at the Mead all very happy and they make use of local facilities for sports/ theatre productions etc. Most people we know describe it as feeling like a warm village school but with the advantages of a bit more of an academic push and time for other things due small classes. My nieces just ADORE it! It is definitely a school which feeds more towards grammars at 11 and 11+ independents (so fine for girls independents or those looking at Sevenoaks but wouldn't work for Tonbridge which is 13+). However it have the same drama or sport facilities as schools like Holmewood/ Somerhill with no onsite pool/theatre etc but still does well in team sports and has the numbers to field good teams. Both my nieces are keen on sports and are definitely always busy with something. The one minus that friends mention is parking. Oddly the playground issue isn't as big a deal compared to other preps - Holmewood have large grounds but most of the preprep children are restricted to rather small artificial surface playgrounds for nearly all their play times. The year 1/2 playground looked quite nice but the reception playground looked tired (a bit grotty) and uninspiring on our tour. So for all intents and purposes less space for free play for the majority of play times when compared to the mead in pre prep! This has been a real irritation for some friends at Holmewood as surely the youngest children should be playing/bug hunting in the grounds the most?

If you are mulling over alternatives in the area it's worth keeping in mind schools like Holmewood feed to independents. V few go to grammars (4-5 out of cohorts of 60+ and if you look at the pass rate on the Kent test data access requests the percentage who pass is lower than many local state primaries). They don't even publish the data for leavers at 11 or give it to you when you ask on tours which I think is telling. Children who leave at 11 are also not celebrated in speech days etc which has really upset a few friends who did leave then either for grammars/local girls schools. Parents we know have v mixed feelings about the direction under the new head who is VERY progressive. There is bigger wellbeing focus (good) but academics not the same as 5 years ago (their pre prep children are having a very different experience to older siblings). Lots of grumbling about poor literacy in pre prep and people looking to move children if things don't pick up. Prep does seem to be a bit better from what parents say. Those that love it are definitely commited to independent schools until 18 and often have quite sporty/ dramatic children. They do also sing the praises of Holmewood's warm and supportive community. They also do lots of enrichment activities like trips/ visits/ art days/ singing for wellbeing / meditation / lots of plays etc but some feel this sometimes comes at the cost of core curriculum time. So many hours in the day! However I do think it is very good at sport and perhaps the best for drama.If I had a sporty/dramatic child and was happy with boarding at Eastbourne/ Bedes etc from 13 I wouldn't rule it out. It might be a case of them taking a much slower/steadier approach knowing they have a bit more time.

Based on the work/ reading books we saw on our own tours the Mead does seem quite significantly ahead academically when compared to Holmewood (particularly when you look at their writing when flicking through books) but it seems to achieve this without it feeling like a hot house. Somerhill (Tonbridge), Hilden Grange ( Tonbridge), Sevenoaks Prep, Granville ( Sevenoaks), Solefields (Sevenoaks)and New Beacon (Sevenoaks) are also streaks ahead and were very transparent about showing us pupils books and talking about where children were in literacy and maths. When we asked those schools what the average reading level was by the end of Y1 / numbers passing screeners every school told us except Holmewood.

If you are on the fence about grammar/independent Hilden Grange (also a bit smaller and more family feel) or Somerhill (bigger/ pool/spoety but still nurturing at least based on the experiences of children we know) might also be worth a good look. They both feed good numbers to grammar and independent schools. They have more working/commuting parents so good wraparound care. I have only met happy parents/children from those schools but they are both getting new heads. Rosehill is another alternative but we only have friends with experience of the early years (from our tours I would say Hilden Grange, Somerhill and the Mead appeared ahead academically based on work we saw). We have also heard very mixed things about the head.

If you are looking at 11+ schools and specialist sports facilities /theatres aren't a big deal for your particular children the Mead is a wonderfully nurturing school that appears more academically more stretching than some of the bigger independents like Holmewood. Perhaps this is because they are aware that everyone HAS to leave at 11+ so options like boarding at Bedes just are not on the table.

If you want something with more in terms of grounds/ facilities but still a strong academic grounding I would look at Hilden Grange and Somerhill and see if you can make the drive work. We are very torn but after initially leaning towards Hilden Grange (quite liked the smaller family feel, their leavers destinations are impressive and academics are a priority) now leaning towards Somerhill . It was little things like spitting a group of prep boys putting in an impromptu play lunch (chaotic looking but v fun) and seeing rather grubby girls making potions/ bug homes in the fields that swayed me I think. My children are a tad free range so I could just imagine them joining in! However, I would be happy with both from an academic perspective so think it's a case of seeing which one feels right. We dont know if we want independent or grammar (will wait and see how VAT impacts them over the net 7 years) so definitely want to keep both options on the table.

Every school will have families that love it and those that don't and I am a big believer in parental instincts usually being spot on when it comes to finding the right fit! I would go back and look at them all as many times as it takes to get that sort of "this feel right feeling" . Take time to flick through books, look at work on the wall, ask about average reading levels in different years/ percentages passing phonics screeners/ leavers destinations/ learning support/ how they offer academic stretch etc but also just watch the children at play time!

Bobbyberta · 24/06/2025 17:08

I can't comment on most of the schools. But have direct knowledge of Rose Hill. No comments on the Head as I do not want the message to contravene Talk Guidelines. Some teachers at the school are wonderful, sadly one of these left. Others, are ok. Nothing special. If you want lots of sports, and very polished and well put together plays/musicals, you will likely be happy. If you are counting on not having to support your children a lot in order to be well prepared for the year 7 transition to secondary (not even talking about 11 plus), look somewhere else. Most likely, your children will be happy there. I believe there are other preps where students can be happy and challenged academically. But this is only my opinion.

duckduckgoose3 · 24/06/2025 20:40

I have children at the Mead and friends at most of the other local independents.

The Mead is great if you care about the eleven plus and are happy with a warm, small school without lots of bells and whistles (to be honest the lack of huge, fancy grounds sits well with me because the school is less expensive to run and the fees reflect this).

If you don't care about the eleven plus and have a more sporty child and/or are aiming for an independent at age 13 (the Mead stops at 11) then Holmewood might suit more!

If I were you I would rule out Rosehill... But all of the others have their different pros and cons. Somerhil has had a turbulent few years with change of head but hopefully that has all settled down now.

duckduckgoose3 · 24/06/2025 20:42

I just read my post - I should also state of course that my kids are very happy and settled and doing well academically at the Mead! Good luck wherever you choose.

Thewalrusandthecarpenter · 24/06/2025 21:13

I have no recent knowledge but so happy to read good reports of The Mead - my daughter was very happy there and, as has been mentioned, she and most of her friends passed the eleven plus and went on to the grammars in TW and Tonbridge.

Kentmum84 · 25/06/2025 10:31

We are actually thinking of moving from Holmewood (so also researching/ visiting the Mead and others in Tonbridge). This is not an easy choice as we have formed wonderful friendships over the years. The nursery is lovely but Pre Prep in particular does seem to have gone off the boil with the current head (although Prep is a lot more slow and steady now too). This isn't necessarily a bad thing and some love the relaxed feel, it seems to suit children who like being busy/need lots of free choice/free flow/ low pressure/ lots of variation of activities in their day. It is very fun! However, it can also seem quite chaotic and literacy and numeracy seem quite behind. It doesn't seem to suit the children who want to just sit down and quietly get on with work so well (as it isn't particularly stretching) and the boistrousness can be frustrating and stressful for some if they just want to concentrate.

There is a phenomenal amount of extra stuff (and some children just thrive with this) but it does seem to come at the expense/time allocated to core curriculum skills/reading/writing/maths . The line has been "this will pick up next year" for a few years but it just doesn't seem to. Things like phonics/reading seem to be constantly cut to make way for plays/ assemblies/ sports/ singing etc which although lovely activities then have the knock on effect of making home life more pressurised. Instead of reading being a joy it feels like a monotonous battle as our DC and their classmates just don't have the foundations in place to read anything more gripping. We really got a huge shock when we looked at the Mead - the work they were doing looked amazing!

If you are even remotely considering 11+ (or even 11 + entry independents) I would seriously consider the Mead. Holmewood will not help with this and strongly discourage leaving at 11. Everyone we know is very happy at the Mead and although it is obviously smaller with less facilities it seems to hit the sweet spot in terms of accademics and nurturing family feel. Holmewood is great if you are definitely set on 13+ , want low pressure, love sport, love drama (Frozen was incredible), like variety in the day, thrive in a more lively environment and are happy to be a bit flexible with leavers/boarding school destinations. If larger grounds/ sports /13+ entry is really important and the commute is viable I think it's also worth considering some of the schools further afield if you are also after more of a academic push.

TWCurious · 11/07/2025 10:12

Thanks all for replying! I accidentally posted twice about this, thought I'd deleted one. 🤦🏻‍♀️

OP posts:
Twellser1 · 04/09/2025 09:56

I would advocate for the Mead too. Holmewood is definitely not academically focused and they discourage 11 plus. Snooty vibe too where as The Mead is super down to earth. The Mead use facilities in the town which is lovely and gets children into the community rather than on a campus bubble.

MyRoseBiscuit · 27/11/2025 10:12

If it’s not too far, it may be worth looking at some of the prep schools in Tonbridge as well. We love Hilden Grange, and the new Headmistress is just fabulous! We have two boys and would really like Tonbridge, Skinners’, or Judd to be options, and Hilden Grange caters brilliantly for that (and we can scoot to school). Although small (family feel), we’ve found it academically stretching, with great clubs and plenty of sporting opportunities, particularly in athletics. The downside compared with the bigger preps is the lack of an indoor pool, so we arrange lessons through Monson.

One thing I’d suggest, something we found especially helpful, is asking the admissions teams at each school to provide leavers’ destinations in a format that’s easily comparable across all the secondaries you’re considering. School websites can be very (or deliberately) misleading. My sister is also looking and pointed out that the Holmewood House pie chart is completely meaningless. Having looked at it myself, it’s frankly just a badly made graph (even my children know how to select and produce an appropriate one by now). Did the Maths teachers not give feedback?

For example in 2025: 11% of children go to Tonbridge - out of how many? What does that actually mean if a third leave in Year 6, which is the norm? Let’s say there are 45 children in Year 8; 11% would be 5 children. But if 22 children left in Year 6, that’s actually 5 out of 67, which is just 7.5% going to Tonbridge. If Tonbridge is your goal (as it is for my sister-in-law), that’s a bit of an issue. They also don’t mention the Year 6 leavers at all - why? Do they not care where they go ? Not ideal if you are considering grammars. Or do those destinations not reflect well on them? If those 22 children are all heading to super-selective grammars versus going to Bethany, it paints a very different picture of the school.
Also, in the current pie chart, when 3% clearly represents one child, why are some schools named while others are bundled together under “Other”? Is it snobbery—“this private school is worth name-dropping but not that one”? Yet “Other” could include top international schools, and the Year 6 leavers could all be heading to super-selective grammars, but you need to know which it is, particularly given the rumblings about sliding academic standards. Likewise, there’s no clear data for The Mead or Rose Hill, so it’s definitely worth digging into all three before deciding. The Tunbridge Wells and Sevenoaks preps all seem much more transparent.

If the admissions team won’t provide clear details of where all their leavers go, it should ring alarm bells.

duckduckgoose3 · 27/11/2025 11:34

I agree with the above poster and this is what I did. I've just dug up the email I received from Holmewood so I don't misquote and it reads 'Only around 5-6 children will leave us for grammar' caveated with lots of talk about how most go to private school (but not especially academically selective privates in most cases).

The Mead has just had an incredible year for the 11 plus by all accounts. They haven't officially released numbers yet but here is an instagram post:
https://www.instagram.com/p/DP6bf5jjDUH/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link&igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==

I know it is maddening it doesn't say how many children took it, I will try to find out but it was most of the year.

I think the Mead and Hilden Grange are the best for Grammar entry if that is important to you. If it isn't then the others in the area all have their strengths. Anyone reading this thread is in a lucky position to have lots of good options!

MyRoseBiscuit · 27/11/2025 13:09

You also need to be clear about which grammar schools you have in mind, especially if you’re thinking of super-selectives like Skinners’, Judd, or TOGS later on. From what friends have shared, very few of the grammar places or scores achieved by pupils who pass at Holmewood House would be strong enough for a super-selective. I wouldn’t let an admissions team get away with a generic statement that groups all grammar schools together. If only 2/5 grammar places at Holmewood are for super selectives out of a cohort of 65 that’s not great if you are working towards Judd/Skinners.

It’s entirely reasonable to ask which specific grammars pupils move on to, and how many scored above 380 which, notably, The Mead actually mentions on their Instagram post. Those details matter just as much as the general numbers: how many pupils sit the 11+, and what percentage pass. If a school isn’t happy to share those details you really need to question why.

bluemonday87 · 27/11/2025 19:46

The difficulty with using grammar school pass rates as a measure of a prep school is that you simply don’t know how much tutoring sits behind those results. Many families aiming for grammar places are tutoring heavily as well as sending their child to prep. I know some that have started as early as Year 2! Other kids in year 4/5 are spending 3+ hours each Saturday in the run up to the Test being tutored. In that context, I think pass rates reflect the determination of the parents and external input at least as much as they reflect the school itself. We chose our prep based on whether it seemed a nice environment where DS would be happy. We will worry about secondary schools nearer the time.

MyRoseBiscuit · 29/11/2025 20:09

That sounds absolutely horrendous! At our school, the norm for ISEB or 11+ prep is usually about an hour of tutoring from Year 5 onwards, whether that’s with a tutor or a bit of practice with parents. Some people start earlier in Year 4, and others wait until after Christmas in Year 5, and of course some barely tutor at all. I honestly think that being in a school with a strong academic focus really helps avoid all the tutoring madness. If children already have a solid grounding in English and Maths, and are often working about a year ahead, then it becomes more about fine-tuning exam technique rather than cramming core subjects and trying to master technique at the same time.

For our family, leavers’ destinations matter a lot. The local boys’ day schools are highly selective, and we know we don’t want our children to board. Families who are happy with less selective options like Bedes, Eastbourne, or Worth, which are all lovely schools, also need to feel comfortable with their children being away from home and with the higher boarding fees. No matter which path you choose for your child though, I really do think having all the information in front of you makes it so much easier to feel confident in your decision.

bluemonday87 · 29/11/2025 23:41

I do understand what you mean about strong academics, but I don’t think that alone explains the very different outcomes you see between the schools. Pretty much all established preps teach at least a year ahead, ours certainly does. So that’s not something unique to the highest-scoring ones. The real difference is what the families are aiming for and the structure of the school.

At a 3-13 prep like Holmewood, many families already have already decided on independent senior schools at 13. For them, the Kent Test is often more of a “let’s see how they do” or a Plan B. Plenty just give it a go without tutoring because grammar isn’t their main route. Those parents are far more focused on the ISEB Pre-Test and the 13+ process. And while some do tutor for the ISEB, it’s nothing like the intensity you see for the Kent Test. The ISEB isn’t a percentile race and schools look at interview, reports, attitude and ongoing academic data. So preparation varies enormously, with some tutoring lightly, and some not at all. That inevitably produces very different Kent Test statistics, but it doesn’t mean the school is any less academic.

The dynamic at The Mead is completely different. Because everyone leaves at Year 6, families have to make the choice at 11. And if they don’t want their local state secondary, the good private options at 11, especially for boys, are fairly limited. They can’t access schools like Tonbridge at 13 from the Mead, so grammar becomes the main route for many families. That naturally creates a cohort where intensive Kent Test preparation is the norm rather than the exception.

It’s also important to remember that the Kent Test isn’t a curriculum exam, it’s a percentile competition. Even very strong children can miss out simply because others have had years of targeted practice. That’s why tutoring makes such a difference, and why parents aren’t always open about how much they’re doing. If everyone else knew, they’d match it, and the bar would rise even higher. People want to preserve whatever advantage they’ve created for their own child. This secrecy means headline percentages don’t necessarily reflect the teaching; they often reflect who has invested the most in external preparation. Tutoring also covers exam-specific techniques and timing that both state and prep schools aren’t allowed to teach. I think all of that has far more influence on scores than the difference between one prep curriculum and another.

For context, my DS isn’t at either of these schools, so I don’t have any vested interest in defending one over the other. But I do know families at both, and from what I’ve seen, the patterns in the results tend to reflect parents priorities and preferred exit points far more than they reflect school academic strength. That’s why I’m cautious about treating raw 11+ percentages as a meaningful comparison between schools with completely different structures and goals.

And finally, on the secondary options you mentioned, I'm pretty sure all of those independents take day pupils, so boarding isn’t compulsory. There are others too, like Sevenoaks, Ardingly, Brighton College, Hurst. These have day places and most have direct buses from TW. So for many families at the 3-13 preps, grammars simply aren’t the destination they’re aiming for, even if their child could be tutored into a super-selective score. Naturally, they don’t push hard for Judd/Skinners, and the 11+ stats at those preps reflect that. So I don't think that alone suggests the school is less academic; it just means the families have different goals.

Twellser1 · 04/12/2025 08:42

I think around 1/3 of children at The Mead go to independent secondary and there are plenty of Y6 options. The ones we are looking at are Hurst, Ardingly, Worth, Bedes, Dulwich, Mayfield, Sevenoaks etc all take from Year 7.
I also think the crazy tutoring is by the state schools in TW. At the Mead there is none of this tutoring from Year 2 business.

The school is academic and teaches the children a year ahead, and there is plenty of support such as talented groups and interventions. I imagine having a wider curriculum means that children naturally pick up the skills such as specialist STEM teaching, music, French, Performing Arts.

The good thing at The Mead is that all options are open. The school has no further interest in 'keeping children for year 7 and 8' like the other schools, so just want to best fit. At the age of 6 it may be too early to decide whether your child is grammar or whether you can afford private education for the next 12 years (plus inflation) so good to keep options open and if you decide the grammar route or ISEB to independents the children do fantastically well.

Twellser1 · 04/12/2025 09:01

It is worth also mentioning that al the independent secondary schools (Sevenoaks, Hurst, Brighton College, Dulwich Prep, Mayfield Girls, Worth, Ardingly) all also take for year 7 & 8. But if you join before Year 9 you are guaranteed a place (instead of going through the process of rigorous testing in Year 8) so if you have a child and you are unsure they would test well then contact these schools in Year 6. I know Holmewood and Rosehill have a huge y7 and 8 recruitment (RH even offer seriously discounted fees) as they lose them to these schools, so I would say The Mead and HG which stop in Y6 means the children get all the experiences of being school leaders, trips away, being in the school show etc.

bluemonday87 · 04/12/2025 10:16

With Tonbridge, Bede’s and Eastbourne College, Year 9 is basically the only proper senior entry.

Bede’s is a good example, as anything before Year 9 is actually at their prep school in Eastbourne, which is a totally different site. The senior school is in Hailsham, and you only join that at 13+.

Tonbridge and Eastbourne College are the same - Year 9 is the real entry point.

Sevenoaks does take some at Year 7, but it’s only about 60 and they’re all day pupils. Their big intake is still Year 9, when well over 100 join (both day and boarding).

Dulwich Cranbrook does 11+ now, but they used to stop at Year 8, so joining in Year 7 is basically joining what used to be the prep side. And they only go up to 16, so you'd need to find a new school to do A-Levels.

And even for the schools that do have a Year 7 entry (Sevenoaks, Ardingly, Worth, etc.), it isn’t some “easy route in”. They’re all still selective at 11+, and places aren’t guaranteed just because you're already at the school. Hurst even says that joining their Year 7–8 “Senior Prep” doesn’t automatically get you into the Senior School, which tells you how they see it.

So yes, some admit at Year 7, but definitely not all, and for a few of them Year 9 is the only genuine senior entry point anyway. This is why some preps encourage joining them for Years 7 and 8 (like HH and Rose Hill), because it genuinely supports pupils who are aiming for the more traditional 13+ independents.

bumbletub · 04/12/2025 15:01

@bluemonday87 I have toured all these schools. I can ensure you the head at Hurst said if we join Y7 easier route and don't have to leave. We are aiming for Sevenoaks (which is co ed) or Brighton College (also co Ed). Happy to not consider Tonbridge- don't personally like that all boys vibe and want a more rounded child. Bedes have announced today they are opening a union (year 7&8) on their upper dicker - closer site. Having spoken to these schools there are so many benefits of going early and settling in before GCSE years. It has been encouraged by all. Blue Monday do you work at RH or HH in Year 7+8 admissions? I think it's safe to say we are blessed with a range of schools with 90% having Year 7 entry as well.

bumbletub · 04/12/2025 15:02

Junior school*

bluemonday87 · 04/12/2025 16:40

No, I definitely don’t work in admissions anywhere! I’m only commenting as a parent trying to understand the different structures. There do seem to be quite a few Mead parents on here recently (which is great for anyone focusing on 11+), but I’m looking at it from the other direction because the 3–13 model actually suits us better.

Part of that is simply logistics. Some of the senior schools are a fair distance for us, and I’d much rather my DS did that commute at 13 than at 11, so we’re leaning towards staying in a prep until Year 8 although we’re not fully decided yet.

That’s why I’ve been trying to understand how the various schools structure their Year 7 and Year 9 intakes; not to promote any particular school, but because the routes work differently depending on whether you leave at 11 or 13.

My comment on Hurst was only because I’d read this in their admissions policy (link below). If the Head gave different guidance on your tour, that’s really useful to know as well.

“Year 9 (13+): From Hurst Prep School: Entry is conditional upon a satisfactory behavioural record throughout Years 7 and 8, as well as their performance in the Year 8 exams…”

www.hppc.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/Admissions-Policy-v3.pdf

It’s great that there are strong options on both paths. It really just comes down to what fits each family best.

Dysonquery · 04/12/2025 16:53

It’s more like 80-90 at Sevenoaks for Y7. **

MyRoseBiscuit · 04/12/2025 18:53

We also have a boy, and our first secondary choices would be Tonbridge and Sevenoaks. We explored the Sevenoaks process in detail during the one-to-one tours, and if you are planning on being a day pupil, rather than a boarder, your chances are higher for Year 7. However, with the current political uncertainty, we want to keep grammars on the table, not only for potential financial reasons but also because we want to see how factors such as university admissions evolve over time.
We are at Hilden Grange, which we absolutely love, and you can choose either 11 or 13 for leavers’ destinations. There is also not a heavy tutoring culture, as the children have a very strong academic foundation. In fact, the tutor used by most parents for grammar preparation recommended not starting before Year 5 to avoid boredom, and said extra maths sessions were generally unnecessary, as the children were already quite far ahead. We also have very happy friends at Somerhill and New Beacon, which also offer 11 and 13.

We have heard very mixed feedback about Holmewood. Academically, the picture appears inconsistent, with some families content but many others notably unhappy and spending a considerable amount on external support to bridge gaps they felt the school was not addressing. Quite a few parents who had hoped for Tonbridge have moved to Hilden Grange for a stronger academic pathway, especially those aiming for more selective 13 plus destinations.

For girls, 13 plus co-educational entry is more complicated, as although Hilden Grange is co-educational, most pupils remaining to 13 are boys, and Somerhill only goes to 13 for boys, not girls. Most girls’ schools, including boarding schools such as Wycombe Abbey, CLC, Downe House and Benenden, now take the majority of their cohort at 11, and there is a significant social advantage to joining then. The other co-educational 13 plus option would be Sevenoaks Prep, which also goes to 13, although it is a longer drive.

Tonbridge and Hurst both use the ISEB, but the threshold is noticeably higher for Tonbridge. I cannot think of a case in which a pupil holding a Tonbridge offer from Hilden Grange did not secure a place at Hurst, which is a common back-up. However, the reverse does occur, which aligns with published league tables. Eastbourne uses “relevant data” and is very softly selective; at Hilden Grange it is commonly used as a safety option, and I have never known anyone fail to secure a place, even those whose children find the academic side more challenging.
For us, the focus would be Tonbridge and Sevenoaks, but we want the super-selective grammars to remain an option, and Hilden Grange seems to provide the broadest set of pathways. When choosing between buying a house in Tonbridge or Tunbridge Wells, we opted for Tonbridge, as we felt that schools such as Holmewood House did not, academically speaking, offer sufficient value for the fees. That said, we were coming from a more academically driven London prep, which may have influenced our perspective.
If you are certain that Hurst or Eastbourne is the right fit, Holmewood House can be a good option, particularly for children who love the performing arts. However, for families aiming for more selective academic destinations, it may be worth considering other schools. Holmewood House sent only 11 per cent of its 13 plus cohort to Tonbridge, and when adjusted for Year 7 leavers, that is closer to 7 to 8 per cent of the full cohort, compared with 31 per cent at Hilden Grange and 17 per cent at Somerhill. Considering that both of those schools also send many of their strongest academic pupils to Judd and Skinners, the difference is notable. For Sevenoaks, Hilden Grange sent 10 per cent, Somerhill also sent 10 per cent, while Holmewood House sent 5 per cent, potentially lower once adjusted. The local (within 30 min) day-school options, both independent and grammar, are extremely competitive for boys in this area.

MyRoseBiscuit · 04/12/2025 19:17

@bumbletub We received the same message from Hurst when we asked about entry at age 11 versus age 13. They said that unless there was a significant behavioural concern, it was much easier for students to move up from age 11 than to join as new pupils at 13, as they take their pastoral responsibility to their existing cohort, and the continuity of their education, very seriously.

bumbletub · 04/12/2025 20:01

@bluemonday87thats greay for you but you are spreading misinformation.. There are plenty of schools and prefable to start year 7 so just because that logistically situation doesn't work for you doesn't mean that schools that end at year 6 are disadvantaged. If I was you I would book onto Hurst and chat to the head yourself. I agree Rosebiscuit they told us higher chances at sevenoaks for year 7. And like you we want options (Hurst, Bedes, Ardingly being back ups too)

bluemonday87 · 04/12/2025 20:49

I hardly think quoting Hursts own admissions policy and linking to it is misinformation @bumbletub