Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Education

Join the discussion on our Education forum.

No exodus to state sector after VAT added to private school fees, say English councils.

502 replies

FruitPolos · 10/03/2025 09:25

Article in today's Guardian. Interesting to note the comments from Surrey in particular given the discussion on Mumsnet about this particular area.

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2025/mar/10/no-exodus-to-state-sector-after-vat-added-to-private-school-fees-say-english-councils

"Surrey, which has large numbers of children in private education, recorded a dip in the proportion of families getting their first pick of schools for September. But Clare Curran, the county council’s cabinet member for children, families and lifelong learning, said: “Surrey has not seen a significant rise in the number of applications for a year 7 state school place for children currently in the independent sector compared to last year.“For September 2025, 664 on-time applications were received from Surrey residents with children in the independent sector, compared with 608 for September 2024, a rise of 56.“While the percentage of applicants offered their first preference school has decreased for September 2025 [80.6%] compared with 2024 [83.1%], the 2025 figure is not dissimilar to the 2023 figure of 81.3%.”

No exodus to state sector after VAT added to private school fees, say English councils

Most say they have seen no impact on applications for year 7 places, despite warnings from those against policy

https://www.theguardian.com/education/2025/mar/10/no-exodus-to-state-sector-after-vat-added-to-private-school-fees-say-english-councils

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
VaVaFrome · 12/06/2025 20:23

Another76543 · 10/06/2025 20:10

Exactly. “Instead of extracting £1.5bn from private schools, Treasury analysis has suggested that the new tax policy could cost the Government an extra £650m per year.”

I suspect that there’ll be some (including the likes of Reeves and Rayner) who’ll still be happy with this. The policy was never about raising money. It was based on spite and the desire to harm the private sector and the children that use it.

Ironically, I don’t think Rayner is the worst culprit. The main driver for this is Labour politicians who were politically active at Oxford and harbour massive chips on their collective shoulders about privately educated fellow students who they felt socially excluded by

RantingAnonymously · 12/06/2025 21:39

Don't forget the guilt of those who were privately educated themselves.
I suspect that may have well been a factor, too

New posts on this thread. Refresh page