Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Education

Join the discussion on our Education forum.

A short story, for the attention of Ms Reeves

141 replies

mrjsw · 25/09/2024 18:19

This story is about fishing, but of course fishing is just a metaphone. It is really about anything that you and your children are passionate about.

When my son first started learning to fish, he was at the local stream, using a piece of string on a stick. This was fine, and it was great for most of the other kids there because it was free and provided them with all the basics that they needed. Yet it was easy to see that my son was a very gifted angler from an early age and he was clearly frustrated with his progress. He wasn't getting the support from the people around him at the stream, plus the lack of proper fishing equipment was evidently affecting his ability to develop.

Luckily we became aware of an exam that he could take which could potentially open up access to a huge range of high class fishing spots all around the country. We were warned that it was a grueling process to break into this world of private fisheries and was likely to be extremely expensive. Nevertheless, our son was determined to give it a try because he understood that he could achieve so much more if given the right opportunities. He was only six at this point, and the exam would take up a good year of his childhood in extra study and preparation and he would be competing against kids from all over the world, most of whom had been preparing for this at private pre-fisheries since they were born.

As so we looked at our finances, long and hard. In order to give him a fighting chance at passing the exam we knew we had no choice but to pay for extra fishing lessons away from the stream, and to invest in some professional fishing equipment. There was no guarantee that he would pass the exam and it could all have been for nothing, but the passion our son showed made it all worthwhile.

A year later, our son sat the exam (there were actually many exams as each fishery had their own process). To our delight, through his hard work and sheer determination he did incredibly well. He was offered places at several different fisheries, fisheries with reputations as some of the best in the country! We were over the moon and our son was elated.

With the high of his success came the deep worry of how we would actually afford the place that our son had earned. The fishery he wanted to attend was ranked 3rd in the country and oh boy did they know it! The cost of attending made the expense of the past year pale in comparison. But there was no way we were going to give up now. Again we looked at our finances. We had no savings as we'd spent everything we had on the extra tuition and resources to ensure he could compete in the exam, and we had no family in a position to support us, having both grown up in much more humble conditions than we now found ourselves. With enough sacrifice though, and if I could secure the promotion I'd been working towards, we could just about make it work. It wouldn't be easy for any of us and life would be extremely tough, but if it meant our son could reach his full potential then everything would be worth it.

And so my son began his journey in this new world of elite fisheries, and he began to thrive. We found ourselves in a strange new land, surrounded by people with unimaginable wealth and opportunities at their disposal, but also by many other families like ourselves who were giving up everything to support their children and give them the opportunity to participate in this exciting and enriching environment.

At work, my colleagues were moving out of their starter flats, buying family homes with luxuries like gardens and second toilets, purchasing cars on finance, going on holiday (abroad!), surprising their wives with romantic weekend getaways and generally doing all the things that most people with a decent salary like mine take for granted. We, on the other hand, spent our evenings in our small apartment, sitting at the Ikea table combing through our expenses, looking for ways to save a few pounds here and there, cook more efficiently, mend old clothes, and worrying about how to afford the latest hike in the mortgage, the council tax, the electricity, the food shop, and so on.

But it didn't matter, because our son was not only thriving and becoming an excellent angler at the fishery, he was also learning about so much more than just fish. He was being exposed to so many new and fascinating opportunities. He had picked up musical instruments, he was a confident speaker and team player, he was learning new languages, and he was so far ahead of where he would have been at the local stream as to be unrecognisable. He was full of a sense of achievement and confidence, and above all he was happy.

And so we were happy too, despite the daily struggle to balance our finances and the constant bombardment from all sides by the ever increasing cost of living. We were happy that we could make things work, that my salary was just enough to cover our expenses, that we could still put food on the table and keep the meagre roof over our heads, and that we could watch our son grow and thrive and come home every day glowing with new knowledge.

And then the government decided that the children of families who work hard, save hard, and sacrifice everything do not deserve to attend these elite fisheries. That the likes of us should be forced to use the local stream along with everyone else who works for a living. That only the properly rich, those with trust funds and investments and property portfolios and generational wealth, those who don't have to work or save or sacrifice, only those kind of people should be allowed to send their children to these elite fisheries. Not us pretenders. Us who earn a salary. Us who pay the lions share of taxes. No, we should not be allowed to strive to better our children's future. After all, it was from these elite fisheries that most of the people in government came, and they didn't want to see us in with a chance at the kind of opportunities they had when growing up.

They realised that the money we had earned (and which the government had already taken 45% of before we even received it) was not being spent on "stuff" (that is, useless consumer items that people don't need), and so they were not getting their extra taxes when we spent our money, and it was not being saved so they could not get their extra taxes from our savings either. They realised that we were investing our money in something they couldn't tax (yet): education, knowledge, our children's future.

And so they changed the law and taxed the money that we invested in our children. But they didn't do this in a way that would allow us to adjust our life to meet this new onslaught of cost with careful planning, or time to get another promotion, to get a new job, get a second/third job, or whatever it took to meet this fresh demand for more money. No, they engineered it so that the likes of us would have no chance to attempt to meet this sudden, insurmountable financial burden. They said this new tax would be payable immediately. And to make sure that the fisheries couldn't soften the blow for their hard working families, they also hit the fisheries with many additional taxes at the same time. This ensured that the fisheries were forced to pass on the full burden of the education tax and had much less of the money they usually set aside to support struggling families through hard times. They had thought this one through with cunning and malicious intent, and there was no escape for the likes of us.

Our son, our bright, gifted son who is brimming with potential is nine years old and has made firm friends among his peers at the elite fishery that he worked so hard to get into, forming childhood bonds that should have lasted a lifetime. He is at the peak of his curiosity and educational awakening.

Yet now he has been ripped from this place that he earned through hard work and determination and talent and is back at the local stream. He doesn't understand why. He is confused and conflicted. He is angry. At us, at the world. His spirit has been crushed. His belief that with enough hard work he can achieve anything he puts his mind to has been destroyed. He is years ahead of his peers and he barely recognises the string on a stick that they expect him to catch fish with. He has no interest in what they have to teach him.

Our investment in his future, the money, the years of hardship, the sacrifices, his year of childhood lost to exam preparation, it was all for nothing. Worse than nothing in fact. We have not only lost those years of our lives, the time, the money, we have lost our happy, determined little boy. He is crushed. We have less than when we started in every single way.

With one cruel and spiteful swipe, the government has taken everything from us, just because we dared to believe in a better future for our child.

OP posts:
whatsappdoc · 25/09/2024 23:14

Interesting that a couple of posters have assumed the op is a woman. Most women wouldn't post an extraordinarily lengthy essay about fishing would they?
Op, assuming 25k a year and having to find an extra 5k, a couple of shifts each week down the pub would cover that. Lots of us had two jobs to make ends meet when times were tough.

Ginflinger · 25/09/2024 23:17

What you're saying is that you can't afford to send your son to private school.

Neither can I.

We're in (wait for it) the same boat.

Londonmummy66 · 25/09/2024 23:23

He can walk to the local stream or even the free beach and go fishing - no 9 year old is so special he needs a private school.

BulletproofHat · 25/09/2024 23:30

My son has been officially tested as in the top 0.1 percent of "anglers" nationally.

He did fine at the bog standard local fishery. Now in the standard local fishery for 6th formers and predicted 4 A* A levels.

More importantly, he doesn't think he's too good for the local fishery, and neither do we.

BulletproofHat · 25/09/2024 23:36

Also, it's bollocks to say that the local "elite fishery" was teaching stuff so far removed from the national fishery curriculum that your son "barely recognizes" what they are doing.

No private primary is straying so far from the national curriculum that a state primary is inaccessibly behind if they move schools. They do more 11+ prep is about it. They aren't teaching A level standard to an 8 year old or anything.

LunaLibrarian · 25/09/2024 23:37

All I get from these types of posts is that there’s an invisible line, and you didn’t care about people on the other side of it until you found yourself joining them.

Inslopia · 25/09/2024 23:42

Well that wouldn’t get you a pass in the creative writing part of the 11plus…

LondonLass61 · 25/09/2024 23:42

mrjsw · 25/09/2024 18:19

This story is about fishing, but of course fishing is just a metaphone. It is really about anything that you and your children are passionate about.

When my son first started learning to fish, he was at the local stream, using a piece of string on a stick. This was fine, and it was great for most of the other kids there because it was free and provided them with all the basics that they needed. Yet it was easy to see that my son was a very gifted angler from an early age and he was clearly frustrated with his progress. He wasn't getting the support from the people around him at the stream, plus the lack of proper fishing equipment was evidently affecting his ability to develop.

Luckily we became aware of an exam that he could take which could potentially open up access to a huge range of high class fishing spots all around the country. We were warned that it was a grueling process to break into this world of private fisheries and was likely to be extremely expensive. Nevertheless, our son was determined to give it a try because he understood that he could achieve so much more if given the right opportunities. He was only six at this point, and the exam would take up a good year of his childhood in extra study and preparation and he would be competing against kids from all over the world, most of whom had been preparing for this at private pre-fisheries since they were born.

As so we looked at our finances, long and hard. In order to give him a fighting chance at passing the exam we knew we had no choice but to pay for extra fishing lessons away from the stream, and to invest in some professional fishing equipment. There was no guarantee that he would pass the exam and it could all have been for nothing, but the passion our son showed made it all worthwhile.

A year later, our son sat the exam (there were actually many exams as each fishery had their own process). To our delight, through his hard work and sheer determination he did incredibly well. He was offered places at several different fisheries, fisheries with reputations as some of the best in the country! We were over the moon and our son was elated.

With the high of his success came the deep worry of how we would actually afford the place that our son had earned. The fishery he wanted to attend was ranked 3rd in the country and oh boy did they know it! The cost of attending made the expense of the past year pale in comparison. But there was no way we were going to give up now. Again we looked at our finances. We had no savings as we'd spent everything we had on the extra tuition and resources to ensure he could compete in the exam, and we had no family in a position to support us, having both grown up in much more humble conditions than we now found ourselves. With enough sacrifice though, and if I could secure the promotion I'd been working towards, we could just about make it work. It wouldn't be easy for any of us and life would be extremely tough, but if it meant our son could reach his full potential then everything would be worth it.

And so my son began his journey in this new world of elite fisheries, and he began to thrive. We found ourselves in a strange new land, surrounded by people with unimaginable wealth and opportunities at their disposal, but also by many other families like ourselves who were giving up everything to support their children and give them the opportunity to participate in this exciting and enriching environment.

At work, my colleagues were moving out of their starter flats, buying family homes with luxuries like gardens and second toilets, purchasing cars on finance, going on holiday (abroad!), surprising their wives with romantic weekend getaways and generally doing all the things that most people with a decent salary like mine take for granted. We, on the other hand, spent our evenings in our small apartment, sitting at the Ikea table combing through our expenses, looking for ways to save a few pounds here and there, cook more efficiently, mend old clothes, and worrying about how to afford the latest hike in the mortgage, the council tax, the electricity, the food shop, and so on.

But it didn't matter, because our son was not only thriving and becoming an excellent angler at the fishery, he was also learning about so much more than just fish. He was being exposed to so many new and fascinating opportunities. He had picked up musical instruments, he was a confident speaker and team player, he was learning new languages, and he was so far ahead of where he would have been at the local stream as to be unrecognisable. He was full of a sense of achievement and confidence, and above all he was happy.

And so we were happy too, despite the daily struggle to balance our finances and the constant bombardment from all sides by the ever increasing cost of living. We were happy that we could make things work, that my salary was just enough to cover our expenses, that we could still put food on the table and keep the meagre roof over our heads, and that we could watch our son grow and thrive and come home every day glowing with new knowledge.

And then the government decided that the children of families who work hard, save hard, and sacrifice everything do not deserve to attend these elite fisheries. That the likes of us should be forced to use the local stream along with everyone else who works for a living. That only the properly rich, those with trust funds and investments and property portfolios and generational wealth, those who don't have to work or save or sacrifice, only those kind of people should be allowed to send their children to these elite fisheries. Not us pretenders. Us who earn a salary. Us who pay the lions share of taxes. No, we should not be allowed to strive to better our children's future. After all, it was from these elite fisheries that most of the people in government came, and they didn't want to see us in with a chance at the kind of opportunities they had when growing up.

They realised that the money we had earned (and which the government had already taken 45% of before we even received it) was not being spent on "stuff" (that is, useless consumer items that people don't need), and so they were not getting their extra taxes when we spent our money, and it was not being saved so they could not get their extra taxes from our savings either. They realised that we were investing our money in something they couldn't tax (yet): education, knowledge, our children's future.

And so they changed the law and taxed the money that we invested in our children. But they didn't do this in a way that would allow us to adjust our life to meet this new onslaught of cost with careful planning, or time to get another promotion, to get a new job, get a second/third job, or whatever it took to meet this fresh demand for more money. No, they engineered it so that the likes of us would have no chance to attempt to meet this sudden, insurmountable financial burden. They said this new tax would be payable immediately. And to make sure that the fisheries couldn't soften the blow for their hard working families, they also hit the fisheries with many additional taxes at the same time. This ensured that the fisheries were forced to pass on the full burden of the education tax and had much less of the money they usually set aside to support struggling families through hard times. They had thought this one through with cunning and malicious intent, and there was no escape for the likes of us.

Our son, our bright, gifted son who is brimming with potential is nine years old and has made firm friends among his peers at the elite fishery that he worked so hard to get into, forming childhood bonds that should have lasted a lifetime. He is at the peak of his curiosity and educational awakening.

Yet now he has been ripped from this place that he earned through hard work and determination and talent and is back at the local stream. He doesn't understand why. He is confused and conflicted. He is angry. At us, at the world. His spirit has been crushed. His belief that with enough hard work he can achieve anything he puts his mind to has been destroyed. He is years ahead of his peers and he barely recognises the string on a stick that they expect him to catch fish with. He has no interest in what they have to teach him.

Our investment in his future, the money, the years of hardship, the sacrifices, his year of childhood lost to exam preparation, it was all for nothing. Worse than nothing in fact. We have not only lost those years of our lives, the time, the money, we have lost our happy, determined little boy. He is crushed. We have less than when we started in every single way.

With one cruel and spiteful swipe, the government has taken everything from us, just because we dared to believe in a better future for our child.

Short story?

hellywelly3 · 26/09/2024 00:10

You can no longer afford private school like most other parents. Get over it.

2k2j · 26/09/2024 00:54

LunaLibrarian · 25/09/2024 23:37

All I get from these types of posts is that there’s an invisible line, and you didn’t care about people on the other side of it until you found yourself joining them.

But realistically, when the OP was on one side of the line, what could/should she have done to care about the people on the other side of the line? It’s one thing saying someone cares - but that’s not practical and doesn’t really achieve anything, because it’s just a feeling inside someone’s head. The OP was doing the best she could for her kids, which is what most of us also try to do. For her particular set of circumstances, that was private school.

What I get from threads like this is, ironically, that it’s ok to explicitly and openly not care about people’s problems/concerns if they use a private school/are well off. Can you imagine it the other way around - if someone says they can’t afford to buy Christmas presents for their kids and the reply is “don’t care”. In fact the complete opposite happens (or perhaps used to happen) - on this website (not sure if it’s still done but it certainly was years ago) at Christmas, people on here who can afford it buy presents for the kids of people on here who can’t afford to.

2k2j · 26/09/2024 00:59

hellywelly3 · 26/09/2024 00:10

You can no longer afford private school like most other parents. Get over it.

This is a stressful problem for the OP. I don’t think that telling her to get over it is helpful.

By parents, for parents. Unless the parent is richer than you or has something you don’t or you perceive them to be well off. In those cases, apparently, the parent can go fuck themself.

alwayscrashinginthesamecar1 · 26/09/2024 01:28

This is the most tortured analogy I've read since that 'Welcome to Holland' (p)ollocks!

GreenTeaLikesMe · 26/09/2024 01:41

I read the word “fish” 96 times, not sure what the point of the post was. Something about your child being very clever and gifted, I think. I mean, most parents would just find ways of giving their child some extension work at home in this situation.

UpTheMagicFarawayTree · 26/09/2024 01:43

What absolute nonsense. I've no problem with private schools existing, but I have absolutely no problem with the fees being taxable either. Since everyone in this country has the right to a free education, private education is a luxury and not a necessity. Therefore tax should apply.
If you cannot or will not pay the increase (which is pretty small compared to the regular annual increases many private schools charge), then again that is your choice. You are welcome to use the free education available.

NeverDropYourMooncup · 26/09/2024 07:18

If the OP knew anything about Angling, she'd know that she's effectively bitching about the cost of a syndicate lake has now gone up and she's now not allowed to fish it for the huge, bloated monsters with bait boats, fish finders, drones and a bloke to tie the hooks on the line and stay awake all night in case a bite alarm goes off for her - and might have to actually join the povs on the day ticket lake full of perch, tench and crucian as well as the odd 20 pound common where she'll have to put her own maggots on the hook.

MayaPinion · 26/09/2024 09:07

Have you been on the magic mushrooms?

quantumbutterfly · 26/09/2024 09:07

We have a perfect example of the social mobility private schooling offers if we look at the Middleton sisters. Education, education, education as Tony Blair used to say. He and his children have done very well from it too.

MayaPinion · 26/09/2024 09:12

Maybe a stint with a stick and a bit of string would help you write more succinctly. This is a load of grandiose drivel.

LunaNorth · 26/09/2024 09:18

It’s very long. I’ll summarise it.

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!

Oh, and it’s metaphor. I think a metaphone is like the one Dali made, with the lobster.

Araminta1003 · 26/09/2024 09:20

Metaphore, Megaphone - classic Freudian slip!

Alectoishome · 26/09/2024 09:32

When my son first started learning to fish, he was at the local stream, using a piece of string on a stick. This was fine, and it was great for most of the other kids there because it was free and provided them with all the basics that they needed.

You are everything I always imagined a private school parent to be. State school is fine for our common little urchins because they only need the basics. But your boy, well, he is very special.

I'm genuinely sorry for your boy and the upheaval he has had. I can see why it feels unfair. But life isn't fair for most of us. We could all write our sob stories (but I would be embarrassed to tart mine up in the cringey way you did). But the way you see your child as a Prince among plebs is honestly disturbing.

easylikeasundaymorn · 26/09/2024 09:50

2k2j · 26/09/2024 00:54

But realistically, when the OP was on one side of the line, what could/should she have done to care about the people on the other side of the line? It’s one thing saying someone cares - but that’s not practical and doesn’t really achieve anything, because it’s just a feeling inside someone’s head. The OP was doing the best she could for her kids, which is what most of us also try to do. For her particular set of circumstances, that was private school.

What I get from threads like this is, ironically, that it’s ok to explicitly and openly not care about people’s problems/concerns if they use a private school/are well off. Can you imagine it the other way around - if someone says they can’t afford to buy Christmas presents for their kids and the reply is “don’t care”. In fact the complete opposite happens (or perhaps used to happen) - on this website (not sure if it’s still done but it certainly was years ago) at Christmas, people on here who can afford it buy presents for the kids of people on here who can’t afford to.

Well I'd say the most immediate difference between those two examples is that the vast majority of children (excluding families who don't celebrate Christmas, obviously) get some form of Christmas presents. So those that don't are in an obviously disadvantaged very small minority. Whereas the number of children who go to private school is very small - therefore you are asking people to feel sorry for something 93% of people have never had themselves. It's not a necessity or even a basic luxury -it's a huge entitlement.

easylikeasundaymorn · 26/09/2024 09:55

2k2j · 26/09/2024 00:59

This is a stressful problem for the OP. I don’t think that telling her to get over it is helpful.

By parents, for parents. Unless the parent is richer than you or has something you don’t or you perceive them to be well off. In those cases, apparently, the parent can go fuck themself.

To be fair if OP wanted sympathy and reasonable discussion she could have
A - either joined one of the MANY MANY threads that have already been posted on this topic and expressed her concerns like a normal person without the painful fishing analogy

B - not actively insulted the majority of her intended sympathisers by insulting their unexceptional children whose "basic needs" are perfectly well met by a "piece of string tied to a stick" in their bog standard state schools whose curriculum is "unrecognisable" to her genius little prince...

It doesn't take a genius (or a private education) to work out that most people won't sympathise with someone who starts off the conversation by insulting them...

quantumbutterfly · 26/09/2024 10:41

You had a piece of string tied to a stick? Luxury!

steppemum · 26/09/2024 10:54

This was fine, and it was great for most of the other kids there because it was free and provided them with all the basics that they needed.

Can you honestly not see how offensive this statement is?
So those other kids, they may also be gifted, bright, have huge potential.
Or they may need support with their learning because they have addtional needs.

Their parents may also work really hard, but still not have thousands and thousands of pounds spare for private school.

Or their parents may be uncaring shitheads, BUT THAT ISN'T THE CHILD'S FAULT. Their child still deserves an opportunity to learn.

Why is only your child allowed the opportunity to learn more?

I would love to see the VAT from private schools spent on the schools who are drowning under tight budgets and over crowding.
I firmly believe that every child deserves a chance.