If the LA has failed to comply with the EHCP statutory timescales, have you sent IPSEA’s model letter to the LA? If that didn’t work, have you sent a pre-action letter? You do not need to sit back and accept the LA acting unlawfully.
DS clearly has other needs as well, but he does have SEMH needs. It is common for DC with SEN, especially SEN to the extent an EHCNA has been requested, to have needs in all 4 broad areas. It is a poor EP report who states a pupil with the presentation you describe doesn’t have SEMH needs at all. He obviously has needs in all 4 areas.
The ed psych report said a high level of keyworker support was needed.
If the EP report uses this wording, it is too vague and woolly. Provision in EHCPs is taken from the reports. If that wording is included in F, the EHCP will not be worth the paper it is written on. What is a ‘high level’? What ‘support’? Who is a ‘keyworker’?
His school have said categorically they do not do 121s.
The school is lying. 1:1 would need to be in the EHCP, but 1:1 absolutely can be given in mainstream.
even if the EHCP states they should get the moon on a stick schools just cannot provide that
EHCPs are a legal document. Provision detailed, specified and quantified in F can be enforced, via judicial review if necessary. Parents don’t have to accept provision not being provided. The problem is many EHCPs are written poorly with wording such as ‘high level of support’, ‘access to’, ‘opportunities for’, ‘would benefit from’, ‘small group’, ‘adult support’… which makes it unenforceable, so parents need to appeal to get a watertight EHCP first before it can be enforced.
My last option is quit my job and homeschool, unless anyone has any other suggestions?
You don’t have to EHE. If it is inappropriate for provision to be made in a school, there is EOTAS.
Be aware, to get a school that is wholly independent named in an EHCP you will need to show the LA’s proposed school(s) can’t meet DS’s needs &/or it isn’t unreasonable public expenditure. Many have to appeal.