Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Education

Join the discussion on our Education forum.

If you’re charged VAT will you remove your child from their private school? I’m v stressed!

1000 replies

Liikklu · 27/05/2024 18:05

We won’t be able to pay the increase. Only hope is asking grandparents for the shortfall which we don’t want to do. Anyone else in a similar boat? Do you think it will literally be a 20% increase on fees or will schools absorb some of it? Our school has said they will address the matter ‘if and when’ it applies.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
PerfectForEloping · 27/05/2024 21:24

Efrogwraig · 27/05/2024 21:15

7% of the population use private education. Nearly everyday there is a new thread on Mumsnet about VAT on school fees. For the 93% of us who don't use private education this does seem like a deliberate campaign to make it seem like a mass problem. It really isn't. Let's get this in proportion. Children on free school meals (family income less than £20k) make up @25% of the school population. Much more worrying.

Maybe state school parents should use mumsnet in the way that you think private school parents are then.

Start your own threads and talk about the mass problem that is failing state schools. I see one poster (noblegiraffe?) doing just that and she often gets slated for it.

Theyhadsomehoneyandplentyofmoney · 27/05/2024 21:27

I wonder how many parents will be as happy to see vat applied to education on university fees.

Nextweektoo · 27/05/2024 21:27

I work in the public sector and will have to switch to being a contractor as will many of my friends in order to afford this increase.

Namenamchange · 27/05/2024 21:28

Thegreatergoodgerald · 27/05/2024 18:28

Presumably the grandparents are wealthy? I’d be absolutely mortified to be tapping my parents up for money for anything, let alone a luxury.

If I was a wealthy grandparent, I’d be sad that you were worrying, thinking about moving grandchild and hadn’t already ask me to pay the short fall.

Skippythecat · 27/05/2024 21:29

borWood · 27/05/2024 20:02

Although you're about to get six replies all telling you that no, fee increases will start immediately and we should all get some ironing in and cancel Netflix, you're absolutely right. I'm hoping it's implemented in a way I can support and it somehow does make a difference to under funded state schools.

As someone who works in the tax and education industry it is thought that it will come in very quickly indeed (brought in by a mini budget immediately on Labour victory), that the ‘full’ rise would be 14-15% once VAT recovery available to schools is taken off and that there will be an exemption for SEN kids who have an EHCP which recommends this form of educational setting.

Castleview6 · 27/05/2024 21:29

aiak · 27/05/2024 18:32

I won't remove mine as it'll be just one year of sixth form.

However, I am disgusted by Starmer's hypocrisy on this matter. He sent his own children to a rather lovely state primary school. Loads of that catchment consists of houses in the £2million region. Like Starmer's house. Just like Blair's went to London Oratory or whatever. The state schools that politicians use are ones that most of us could only dream of. Massive inequality. Selection by price of house. Which, if we destroy our private sector, will happen more and more.

My house is probably worth about a quarter of what Starmer's is worth. I don't have access to the kind of exclusive state schools he does so I sent mine to private school (and I don't have an expensive house to show for it at the end of the education process).

The state sector obviously needs money. Why aren't we taxing those in £1million+ houses who use state schools? They could pay VAT of 20% on the value of their free state place? Seeing as it's OK to tax education and the state sector needs money. Why only tax those of us who've had to pay for private due to the shit local state options. Why not actually tax the rich people who are using state places for free, having gamed the housing situation? Like Starmer himself.

The irony of a parent who sends their child to a private school talking about inequality.

Razorwire · 27/05/2024 21:29

Cost of private education will increase more than VAT. Schools lose charity status, then paying VAT on other things that were previously exempt. Cost of running the school goes up.

Wondering how it all gets unwound - religious schools etc.

Sadly, they won’t raise too much additional VAT from parents as spending will just shift from shopping to school fees.
—-
Under VAT law in the UK, the provision of education by an “eligible body” (which includes a registered independent school) is an “exempt” supply for VAT purposes. Goods and services that are closely related to education are also exempt from VAT eg catering, transport, school trips and boarding accommodation.

Skippythecat · 27/05/2024 21:30

And I cannot believe a poster stated kids were struggling for tampons! Every single educational establishment I have been to in the past 5 years has them coming out of their ears. Are they even a teacher???

Livelovebehappy · 27/05/2024 21:31

peachesarenom · 27/05/2024 21:22

I don't recall this kind of concern for state school kids under the conservatives! All children matter, if we got rid of all private schools like in Finland everyone would have a better education, like they have! Let's do it!!!

Why would we have better education if, as people are saying, only 3-5% of people actually send their kids to private schools in the UK currently? And Labour will obviously lose a big chunk of revenue raised from the VAT to fund the Utopia we’ve all been promised, so aren’t going to be onboard with the Finland way.

Einwegflasche · 27/05/2024 21:32

Skippythecat · 27/05/2024 21:30

And I cannot believe a poster stated kids were struggling for tampons! Every single educational establishment I have been to in the past 5 years has them coming out of their ears. Are they even a teacher???

So, let's get this straight - you've not witnessed it, so it's not happening?

PerfectForEloping · 27/05/2024 21:33

Namenamchange · 27/05/2024 21:28

If I was a wealthy grandparent, I’d be sad that you were worrying, thinking about moving grandchild and hadn’t already ask me to pay the short fall.

This.

We’ll happily help our kids out in future, including paying for any grandchildren (if we have any) to go to private school if they choose that.

Skippythecat · 27/05/2024 21:33

Castleview6 · 27/05/2024 21:29

The irony of a parent who sends their child to a private school talking about inequality.

I’m not sure about her method of tax but she raises a valid point. The advantage of your local state school being the top of the league tables compared to the bottom of the league tables is VAST and this advantage has been bought by the wealthy too.

thirtyseven37 · 27/05/2024 21:33

Liikklu · 27/05/2024 18:22

@StormingNorman we’ve not broached other parents so far. It feels an awkward conversation but I have no idea if others are in the same boat as us.

Why is it an awkward conversation?

Thegreatergoodgerald · 27/05/2024 21:33

Theyhadsomehoneyandplentyofmoney · 27/05/2024 21:27

I wonder how many parents will be as happy to see vat applied to education on university fees.

None, but only the truly dense would compare the two.

IsEveryUserNameBloodyTaken · 27/05/2024 21:33

Thegreatergoodgerald · 27/05/2024 18:26

Ask your school. The 90 odd percent of people who don’t use private schools don’t know, and don’t care!

I thought this was Mumsnet so there will be other mums in the same boat as the op.Do you go on every post and post this were you are not included or have you just seen your arse over private schooling.

Legendairy · 27/05/2024 21:34

It isn't a big problem in some areas but it will be in my area. One of our biggest private schools recently went bust which resulted in any last places in the remaining private schools being filled (there weren't many available) plus additional state school places. There are already portacabins in several local primary schools as the number of additional houses/flats also being built on top of those leaving the private school is putting so much pressure on.

My DS2 finishes this year, we have only managed this last 2 years of having a 10% increase per year instead of the usual 2/3 because DS1 finished 2 years ago so we only had 1 in school but no way could we afford a 20% increase. The school is already sowing the seed about the increase in each annual fee info letter to pre warn people just in case. We would have pulled our DC out straight away as we would have had no choice.

I just feel its wrong. My DC were not in state school due to specific additional needs, they had some scholarships for academic/sports but not bursaries so the fees were still a lot. We would have struggled for full fees anyway as whilst higher than average certainly not really high earners. There are loads of parents at my DCs school who are similar, or would struggle more. Those in private are not taking up a state place at however many thousands a year so I think it's a joke to be also charging VAT.

Like I said it won't affect me personally now anyway but I won't be voting Labour for this reason as well as so many other reasons. I cannot understand why anyone would think Starmer is an appropriate leader for this country. However, who the hell is there to vote for?

Thegreatergoodgerald · 27/05/2024 21:35

thirtyseven37 · 27/05/2024 21:33

Why is it an awkward conversation?

Because no private parent wants to admit that they aren’t wealthy enough to easily afford fees, plus all the extras, to other parents.

thirtyseven37 · 27/05/2024 21:36

aiak · 27/05/2024 18:32

I won't remove mine as it'll be just one year of sixth form.

However, I am disgusted by Starmer's hypocrisy on this matter. He sent his own children to a rather lovely state primary school. Loads of that catchment consists of houses in the £2million region. Like Starmer's house. Just like Blair's went to London Oratory or whatever. The state schools that politicians use are ones that most of us could only dream of. Massive inequality. Selection by price of house. Which, if we destroy our private sector, will happen more and more.

My house is probably worth about a quarter of what Starmer's is worth. I don't have access to the kind of exclusive state schools he does so I sent mine to private school (and I don't have an expensive house to show for it at the end of the education process).

The state sector obviously needs money. Why aren't we taxing those in £1million+ houses who use state schools? They could pay VAT of 20% on the value of their free state place? Seeing as it's OK to tax education and the state sector needs money. Why only tax those of us who've had to pay for private due to the shit local state options. Why not actually tax the rich people who are using state places for free, having gamed the housing situation? Like Starmer himself.

It almost sounds like you want us to feel sorry for you.

Efrogwraig · 27/05/2024 21:37

PerfectForEloping · 27/05/2024 21:24

Maybe state school parents should use mumsnet in the way that you think private school parents are then.

Start your own threads and talk about the mass problem that is failing state schools. I see one poster (noblegiraffe?) doing just that and she often gets slated for it.

Happy to do that after the election when l hope there will be a government which will want to make those changes for the better.

thirtyseven37 · 27/05/2024 21:38

TimeFlysWhenYoureHavingRum · 27/05/2024 18:40

Have you considered switching to value brands at the supermarket? Or getting rid of expensive mobile phones / netflix subscriptions / brand name trainers etc?

Indeed. Maybe a few less holidays too. Ditch the hot tub.

NeverHadHaveHas · 27/05/2024 21:40

IsEveryUserNameBloodyTaken · 27/05/2024 21:33

I thought this was Mumsnet so there will be other mums in the same boat as the op.Do you go on every post and post this were you are not included or have you just seen your arse over private schooling.

Search her username. She’s a new poster and one who is apparently only here to bang the anti private school drum but can’t formulate any decent arguments of her own. So, she’s just resorting to spite 🤷‍♀️

NeverHadHaveHas · 27/05/2024 21:42

Thegreatergoodgerald · 27/05/2024 21:35

Because no private parent wants to admit that they aren’t wealthy enough to easily afford fees, plus all the extras, to other parents.

Are you actually going to reply to any of the private school posters, or just the posters who agree with you?

whistleblower99 · 27/05/2024 21:43

Imagine being so consumed with bitterness that you click on every thread with clear titles - to say this doesn’t concern you.

It would be like going on a thread with Universal Credit in the title as a higher earner and breaking down how much of your taxes fund it.

Neither options are logical and make any sense. All that anger will manifest one way or another. Let it go. Not everyone had the same circumstances. This isn’t benefits net - not yet any way.

EasternStandard · 27/05/2024 21:45

Thegreatergoodgerald · 27/05/2024 21:35

Because no private parent wants to admit that they aren’t wealthy enough to easily afford fees, plus all the extras, to other parents.

What’s with all the sneering and spite?

Merryoldgoat · 27/05/2024 21:48

If the 20% increase makes it unaffordable then you can’t afford private school anyway - inflation busting increases mean you’d have been at a near 20% increase in 3 years anyway.

I work in a private school in the finance department. If we saw a decrease of 5% in pupil numbers I’d be surprised.

Most schools will at the very least offset the reclaim portion and therefore the increase is more likely to be in the order of 15%-17%

Most schools are planning some kind of bursary top-up to support the increase but the assumption will be you could afford the base fees.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.