Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Education

Join the discussion on our Education forum.

20% vat on fees

1000 replies

namechangedforthisone35 · 10/12/2023 06:17

IF Labour get in and IF the 20% does get added to fees, how many private school pupils will be moved to state? I have three kids (one not school aged yet) and in private school. One of many reasons because I didn't want them in a class of 30. I couldn't afford the vat increase so would have to move them but then that class of 30 becomes, what, 40?! In an already strained and unresourced system?!

Wwyd?

Y - I'd have to move kids to state
N - I'll pay the vat

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
jgw1 · 10/12/2023 19:59

EasternStandard · 10/12/2023 19:56

Like I said you do you.

Yes indeed, everyday I work towards building a great boat proof wall.

EasternStandard · 10/12/2023 20:00

Labraradabrador · 10/12/2023 19:45

Framing it as a ‘luxury’ is pretty disingenuous - I am providing my child with the educational environment she needs but the state is unable to provide. I also pay for them to see a dentist privately because there is no nhs provision anywhere nearby- is dental care a luxury?

what is a luxury to me is being able to take such a cavalier attitude towards the impact of poorly considered policy on real children (both those in and out of the state system) in pursuit of utopian ideals.

Moving on from usual odd stuff trying to derail in pp. It’s 🤷‍♂️ to me that they invest time in trying to goad but hey

Yes it’s sad and it’s a shame if your dc and others will lose support due to it.

Charlie2121 · 10/12/2023 20:04

This whole notion that higher earners somehow don’t pay a fair share is nonsense.

I’m in a senior role with a very good salary. My entire income is PAYE. I cannot avoid a single penny of tax. I pay marginal rates of up to 65% + NI. Last year I paid over 80k income tax. I’d love to know what the rationale is for making me pay even more.

There comes a point where higher tax rates and the constant chipping away of your take home pay through changing thresholds and the like make you look at how soon you can retire. I could easily retire 6 years earlier than planned. That’s half a million in lost receipts for the Treasury. If high end tax rates were more reasonable I’d work for longer.

This country needs to do more to protect and embrace higher earners. Without them the country is bankrupt.

jgw1 · 10/12/2023 20:08

Charlie2121 · 10/12/2023 20:04

This whole notion that higher earners somehow don’t pay a fair share is nonsense.

I’m in a senior role with a very good salary. My entire income is PAYE. I cannot avoid a single penny of tax. I pay marginal rates of up to 65% + NI. Last year I paid over 80k income tax. I’d love to know what the rationale is for making me pay even more.

There comes a point where higher tax rates and the constant chipping away of your take home pay through changing thresholds and the like make you look at how soon you can retire. I could easily retire 6 years earlier than planned. That’s half a million in lost receipts for the Treasury. If high end tax rates were more reasonable I’d work for longer.

This country needs to do more to protect and embrace higher earners. Without them the country is bankrupt.

Surely the tax reciepts would only disappear if you retired if your job also disappeared when you retired?

kitsuneghost · 10/12/2023 20:16

I assumed labour would be building a whole load of new schools before implementing this though so they can encourage people back to state.
Surely the money from stopping the non dom status will pay for them.

jgw1 · 10/12/2023 20:18

kitsuneghost · 10/12/2023 20:16

I assumed labour would be building a whole load of new schools before implementing this though so they can encourage people back to state.
Surely the money from stopping the non dom status will pay for them.

Is that to replace those schools that are dangerous due to RAAC and other issues?

Charlie2121 · 10/12/2023 20:20

jgw1 · 10/12/2023 20:08

Surely the tax reciepts would only disappear if you retired if your job also disappeared when you retired?

In the current economic climate the reality at higher levels is when someone leaves businesses do everything they can to use the opportunity to reduce costs.

Any replacement, particularly for longer serving higher paid employees, are invariably at a much lower salary.

There’s a big difference between % tax paid on 100k vs 200k.

On 100k you pay 27k tax + NI. 200k is 76k + NI.

On top of this many such businesses are now actively looking at ways to have employees based overseas for tax purposes. They wouldn’t be pressured to do this if higher rates of tax were more reasonable.

jgw1 · 10/12/2023 20:23

Charlie2121 · 10/12/2023 20:20

In the current economic climate the reality at higher levels is when someone leaves businesses do everything they can to use the opportunity to reduce costs.

Any replacement, particularly for longer serving higher paid employees, are invariably at a much lower salary.

There’s a big difference between % tax paid on 100k vs 200k.

On 100k you pay 27k tax + NI. 200k is 76k + NI.

On top of this many such businesses are now actively looking at ways to have employees based overseas for tax purposes. They wouldn’t be pressured to do this if higher rates of tax were more reasonable.

Thank you for clarifying that often those who are paid a lot are paid more than they need to be for the role they do.

Charlie2121 · 10/12/2023 20:25

jgw1 · 10/12/2023 20:23

Thank you for clarifying that often those who are paid a lot are paid more than they need to be for the role they do.

If that’s the conclusion you reached from my comments then I strongly suspect you have an agenda.

jgw1 · 10/12/2023 20:28

Charlie2121 · 10/12/2023 20:25

If that’s the conclusion you reached from my comments then I strongly suspect you have an agenda.

I certainly do have an agenda. To understand as fully as I possibly can what other posters are saying. It is reassuring to know I have been successful on this occasion.

LittleBearPad · 10/12/2023 20:33

Charlie2121 · 10/12/2023 20:04

This whole notion that higher earners somehow don’t pay a fair share is nonsense.

I’m in a senior role with a very good salary. My entire income is PAYE. I cannot avoid a single penny of tax. I pay marginal rates of up to 65% + NI. Last year I paid over 80k income tax. I’d love to know what the rationale is for making me pay even more.

There comes a point where higher tax rates and the constant chipping away of your take home pay through changing thresholds and the like make you look at how soon you can retire. I could easily retire 6 years earlier than planned. That’s half a million in lost receipts for the Treasury. If high end tax rates were more reasonable I’d work for longer.

This country needs to do more to protect and embrace higher earners. Without them the country is bankrupt.

If you’re paying £80k tax I would think you were well past losing your personal allowance? So your marginal tax rate was 47%.

Charlie2121 · 10/12/2023 20:36

LittleBearPad · 10/12/2023 20:33

If you’re paying £80k tax I would think you were well past losing your personal allowance? So your marginal tax rate was 47%.

That’s correct. I was referring to marginal rates in the plural. I pay some of my income at 40%, some at 65% and the reminder at 45% all + NI.

LittleBearPad · 10/12/2023 20:39

Charlie2121 · 10/12/2023 20:36

That’s correct. I was referring to marginal rates in the plural. I pay some of my income at 40%, some at 65% and the reminder at 45% all + NI.

By that logic you also pay some at 20%.

But your tax rates aren’t different to most people with children at private school. Oddly once you’re on £125k you can pay your share to support people on considerably less

jgw1 · 10/12/2023 20:43

LittleBearPad · 10/12/2023 20:39

By that logic you also pay some at 20%.

But your tax rates aren’t different to most people with children at private school. Oddly once you’re on £125k you can pay your share to support people on considerably less

Edited

And some at 0%.

Charlie2121 · 10/12/2023 20:44

jgw1 · 10/12/2023 20:43

And some at 0%.

That’s incorrect. I don’t have any at 0%. I pay tax on every single pound I earn.

LittleBearPad · 10/12/2023 20:46

Charlie2121 · 10/12/2023 20:44

That’s incorrect. I don’t have any at 0%. I pay tax on every single pound I earn.

But again so what. So do I.

jgw1 · 10/12/2023 20:47

Charlie2121 · 10/12/2023 20:44

That’s incorrect. I don’t have any at 0%. I pay tax on every single pound I earn.

You must live somewhere with a tax system I am not familiar with then.
In the UK the first £12,570 of income is tax free.

Charlie2121 · 10/12/2023 20:48

jgw1 · 10/12/2023 20:47

You must live somewhere with a tax system I am not familiar with then.
In the UK the first £12,570 of income is tax free.

Higher earners lose that allowance.

LittleBearPad · 10/12/2023 20:50

jgw1 · 10/12/2023 20:47

You must live somewhere with a tax system I am not familiar with then.
In the UK the first £12,570 of income is tax free.

Not once you earn over £100k. For every £2 you earn over £100k the personal allowance is reduced by a £1. By the time you get to £125k you essentially have no personal allowance anymore and pay 45%.

Between £100k and £125k you have a marginal rate of tax of approx 62% as the pa is withdrawn.

SheilaFentiman · 10/12/2023 20:51

“Lots will rent and get their kid to the top of the waitlist then move back to their real house.”

Councils check for this already, @NotTheLastUserName

jgw1 · 10/12/2023 20:52

Charlie2121 · 10/12/2023 20:48

Higher earners lose that allowance.

I did not know that those who earn over £125,000 lost the tax free allowance.

Its good to learn new stuff.

prh47bridge · 10/12/2023 20:52

Charlie2121 · 10/12/2023 20:48

Higher earners lose that allowance.

Indeed. Once your adjusted net income (in essence, your income less pension contributions and Gift Aided charitable donations) is over £100k, you lose £1 personal allowance for every £2 you earn.

LittleBearPad · 10/12/2023 20:53

SheilaFentiman · 10/12/2023 20:51

“Lots will rent and get their kid to the top of the waitlist then move back to their real house.”

Councils check for this already, @NotTheLastUserName

Plus if they are mid year transfers that waitlist place could last for ages.

SheilaFentiman · 10/12/2023 21:01

Apologies, I meant to tag @Nordlo

kitsuneghost · 10/12/2023 21:07

jgw1 · 10/12/2023 20:18

Is that to replace those schools that are dangerous due to RAAC and other issues?

Forgot about that. Yes them too
I really hope we have a lot of people with non dom status.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.