@Raspberrysins @Libre2
The conflicting advice will possibly be because WFH is just and an indication. Children, for example, whose natural physical state is very slender (and I’m talking before becoming unwell), will get to lower WFH before suffering adverse symptoms and may never reach 100% WFH and yet be fully recovered.
To put that into context Libre2, I just looked to see if you posted your dd’s lowest height and weight and you did. 7 stone 9 and 5 foot 9. The lowest weight I managed to get for my dd was 48.3, although she may have weighed a little less at some stage, but won’t allow weigh ins. This is around 7 stone 9 yet my dd is about 10cm shorter than your dd. Dd was extremely physically and mentally unwell and at that weight, didn’t believe she needed to eat to live. Food for her was poison.
Idk dd’s current weight. She won’t let me weigh her. Maybe 55kg, could be a bit more. She’s still very mentally unwell. If she’s this weight, she’s really edging closer to the 100%. But I don’t think 100% for her will be enough. I’d say at least 110%.
And as I said upthread, I would NOT be letting my dd do a silver expedition at this weight (let alone the gold she dropped out of) because she isn’t yet capable of feeding herself. She’d just forget to eat. As is, I often have to take her breakfast to her because she’s too busy putting her makeup on and doesn’t have time to go downstairs to collect it.