This suggests he's either being very stupid or devious, doesn't it?
He also says that his income is of no relevance to how we split the assets.
He earns x3 more than me.
Could someone please advise? There are kids involved, imbalance of income, mortgage, pensions and company shares to untangle yet he thinks we are going to simply split everything 50:50 including time with the children... without a solicitor.