We’ve been together since 2000, bought house together in 2003, had 2 kids 2007 and 2008, married in 2009.
Dh brought about 90k into our first joint house purchase in 2003. I had about 15k savings that I contributed. He is very insistent that he wants to ‘protect his investment’ we’re we to split, so I assume that the equity will be 15:90, ie 1:6 in his favour :(
I’ve been a sahm (through mutual agreement) since 2007. I’ve built up a self employed, seasonal and part time income to work around school hours. I was planning to return to ‘proper’ work sooner but our eldest is sen so i ended up wfh, when I could, around their school hours. I earn about 16k per year. He earns nearer 90k, plus bonuses.
So ive been out of the workplace for over 14 years. I have a lot of academic qualifications (masters degree and a professional qualification) but absolutely no recent experience. I applied for an admin assistant job and didn’t even get an interview :(
We have about 550-600k equity in our house. Which seems like a lot, but you can barely get a 3 bed terrace for less than 400k in our area. I can’t move areas, as I’d never in a million years get ds (sen) into such a good school as he is in at the moment.
Am I unreasonable to ask that stbx dh gets a mortgage of, say 450k against the family home. This, plus our savings, would enable him to be a cash buyer for a reasonable 3 bed house. In return, I’d ask him to pay the mortgage on the family home for 5-6 years, so the kids and I could (just about) manage to stay here till they leave for uni. I think I’d be able to get benefits on my variable self employed income, as I am restricted with working hours due to ds’ sen (he gets dla).
When the kids are settled at uni (5-6years time) I’ll sell the house, dh can pay off his mortgage and I’ll take what is left and buy a flat somewhere cheaper.
Does this sound reasonable? Dh is convinced I’m trying to fleece him :(