I’ve seen a few threads on here, where it’s been suggested that it’s best not to leave the family home. I’m wondering if there would be any long term financial repercussions on any divorce settlement if I were to do this.
Briefly: I’ve been married for 7 years, but together for much longer. 3 of our 4 DCs still live at home (2 are at secondary school, one is at primary school).
The family home (DH refused to put my name on the mortgage, as my earnings were, and still are, very low,) is a big, rambling property which needs a lot of maintenance, comes with a lot of land and costs a fortune to run. I couldn’t afford to stay here even if I wanted to (I don’t) and besides, DH would never move out.
Due to my earnings, I couldn’t even afford to rent a house in this area. Ironically, H owns various properties in the town and elsewhere (all the mortgages are in his name). He has various income streams but I don’t know his salary.
DF has offered to lend me a deposit for a property, and to try and secure a mortgage in his name. If this goes ahead, I will rent the property from him. The DCs will all be able to have a room each, and continue to attend their current schools.
I imagine that H will want 50/50 with regards to looking after the children, although I’m not 100 % sure of this. The youngest is 10. At that age, do they get a say, and would the secondary school aged children’s wishes also be taken into account?
H is self employed. He has already been on my phone and deleted photos that I took of his ISAs and other financial documents, and has cancelled payments to his pension this month. He will try every trick in the book to ensure I come away with the bare minimum.
I’m not too bothered and knew this would happen. I just want a happy and relaxed home for me and my DCs. He will read this, lovely mners, so don’t feel the need to hold back!