Hi ladies, well the 4th August came and went, THIS IS A WARNING TO YOU ALL .................. stbxh filed a notice to act in person / representing himself in person, my solicitor understood that to mean that he was not going to be having a barrister so I decided not to have one too at the FDR on the 4th. Low and behold, when I turned up, his barrister was there!!!! panick arose and for most of the morning I was shaking like not just a leaf but a whole tree as I'm sure you can imagine!
Anyway, as I was unrepresented, his barrister then tried to say that this FDR was a complete waste of time, (no doubt that he would try to get costs back for this laster on!) but I was totally ready and therefore strongly objected. You see I had put all my cards on the table and made full financial disclosure and even filed a statement of issues, schedule of assets and the last 3 months bank statement up to that date which had been sent to my stbxh in good time, whereas he had done no such thing and had filed nothing either at court or with me but handed in a measly note with typing errors with even his name wrong to the court on the day!!!! he had not made an offer whereas I had and had not even answered all the schedule of deficiencies by this time.
What a surprise that his barrister had not received any of these things?!!!!
Anyway the 2 hour FDR turned into an all day hearing with his barrister treating me like a piece of s**t and me ending up telling him twice (once in a consultation room with just him and me and the other time in front of the judge) not to speak to me like that! he bullied me and although the judge had said that the judge at final hearing would not entertain the idea of taking legal costs from the pot, his barrister nonetheless wouldn't agree to this and so we now go to final hearing, crazy!!!! I stand to lose money so I'm more than happy to now go to final hearing. what a total tosspot!
The judge asked whether we would both be represented at the final hearing and he indicated that he would not, I said how could I believe that as he had indicated the same and here is his barrister, the judge said that it shouldn't be a secret and that we should notify each other in good time before the hearing to agree to either representation or not.
In the interim, the judge strongly suggested that we get our solicitors back and be represented at the final hearing, also that we could make offers and come to an agreement before final hearing which he strongly suggested we do so that we do not use any more money over this.
I also warn anyone out there that if you own a house together and you are trying to get an occupation order against your partner that you make sure you have filed a form (I don't know which form this is but your solicitor can advise) with your mortgagor (bank you have the mortgage with) to advise that this is what you are doing, otherwise you will have your hearing adjourned to the next hearing which will inevitably cost more money for a barrister and solicitors fees.
I hope all this helps anyone out there be more informed. This area is a legal minefield and gets more interesting to me by the minute, my forte is Company Law but I've learned so much about Family Law through this and if you know nothing then you are totally unprotected. Even if you have a solicitor as I have had, there can be slip ups which can cost you what you want.
We are now at the stage that we have agreed to sell the FMH so at least that is one thing we agreed upon. We have started the list of chattels (which for those of you that do not know this means the furniture, contents of the house, the reason that I say this is that I've had 2 emails already from my pedantic stbhx on the spelling and meaning of this word...... he's also so condescending!) and what do you know, he's said he doesn't want any furniture but wants compensation for this and cost of re-housing from the pot
!!!! what a total nut!
My saga continues.............................
