Why isn't anyone discussing Coolock, you ask? Because there's little or no point when you get statements like this:
'There's never a sniff of a similar set up in the salubrious suburbs of any city or town in Ireland. That's because the residents wouldn't have it, but have money and access to the cost of taking out injunctions, and are connected with many in Government so don't have to resort to marching and bringing attention to themselves.
You only have to read what Hazel Chu former Mayor of Dublin had to say about the fact that the tents were removed from her area. Not suitable for her area. Indeed but alright for everywhere else it seems. Can you see why there is anger?'
This is wrong, has been proven wrong on this very thread, but it here it comes again.. and again... and again.
Not only is there a 'sniff of a similar set up in the salubrious suburbs', there are active occupied centres in 'salubrious suburbs' of Dublin, such as Blackrock, Dun Laoghaire and Ballyogan. The residents of 'salubrious' D4 have been campaigning for ages FOR the empty Baggot St hospital to be converted into refugee accommodation.
(My late parents were born in Baggot St hospital, and I know that they would have loved to see it repurposed to house asylum seekers - I know that because they were decent hard-working people who brought their children up to respect people regardless of race or religion, and they taught us to help those in need, having experienced hard times themselves. I'm glad they're not around to see the meanness, violence and racism that is disfiguring their city.)
I have posted here previously what Hazel Chu actually said about people living in unsafe hygienic and inhumane conditions in tents by the canal in 'salubrious' D4 - unsurprisingly, she wanted the people in the tents to be moved somewhere safer and more humane for their sakes.
I lived in England for years, and came across many unvetted Irish economic migrants living off the dole and any other benefits they could lay their hands on.
They did not have the same religion or culture as the majority of the population, and most of them did nothing to integrate socially or culturally. Sounds familiar, doesn't it? But they were Irish so it doesn't count.
What's the point in attempting a discussion when the same disproven points keep reappearing? It's like talking to the wall. A wall with racist graffiti on it.