@MissyB1
@luckylavender
+++++
luckylavender
@1dayatatime - more broadly we did what most other Nations did when faced with a nouvel virus. No one knew what would happen. And herd immunity has been proved to be a non starter as people can catch COVID more than once. But my original post was about furlough. No one could refuse to accept being furloughed, it really wasn't possible. What we should criticise the government for is the billions they wasted on Track and Trace, the VIP lane PPE disaster & the fraudulent COVID loans.
Absolutely this!
++++
It is very easy to be selective remembering how Covid unfolded. It is easy to forget that the initial Government approach was simply herd immunity and no lockdowns. This was quickly overturned (and even denied by Government) due to overwhelming public pressure / fear.
Even once lockdown was introduced it is easy to forget that there were many voices (including on MN) stating that the Covid measures would cause more harm (economic, education, missed cancer diagnosis, lower GDP causing higher mortality, inflation etc) than Covid itself. These voices were shouted down as either Covid deniers, anti vaxx or granny killers.
Indeed whilst herd immunity was shown not to prevent people catching Children twice in much the same way that the vaccine doesn't prevent people catching Covid but both herd immunity (naturally acquired resistance) and the vaccine are effective at reducing how ill people get.
But returning to your original comment about furlough. Yes you are correct that once the measure was introduced no one could really refuse it. However it is easy to forget that the furlough measure was widely supported at the time indeed even popular and that anyone questioning the cost (economic and otherwise) was shouted down for being a Covid denier / uncaring/ granny killer.
And lastly whilst the Government did indeed waste billions at the time this was done with the full support of the majority of the country. To finish off let me give you an example; "Eat out to help out" cost £600 million yet how many people were critical of this use of taxpayers money at the time and how many went "Hey let's tuck in to a half priced Nando's". Indeed even when it was eventually removed there were still voices saying we need to continue it "in order to support the restaurant industry " when in reality they just wanted to continue with half priced Nando's.
We are all to blame here, the Government just (badly) implemented the popular opinion at the time.