“Children are more at risk of other respiratory illnesses than covid”
Are the current number of rsv, flu or pneumonia infections comparable to the number of covid infections in children now? Even if a virus affects a smaller percentage, if the number of infections roses, so does that percentage. So it’s unfortunately it isn’t a comparable situation.
Same for the complications after. Of course other viruses have post viral complications, but see the numbers argument above. If the numbers of children catching flu are lower, the rate of post viral complications will be lower. If the number of children catching covid is higher, there’s a higher potential number of illnesses and post viral complications. I wouldn’t have thought that any of that needed explaining.
And no, no one’s going to give you their email, that’s incredibly weird. But if you’re interested in testimonies, you can have ds’s!
He caught covid back in 2020, developed PIMS and has been left with organ damage and in pain. Not easy for a 12 year old. Unfortunately for the covid minimisers, he was young, fit, slim with no underlying conditions, so should have been completely “safe”.
What’s even harder is that unlike flu, rsv or pneumonia, covid is a novel virus so at first doctors didn’t know how to treat ds’s symptoms or what was happening to him. And, as it’s a novel virus, there isn’t much knowledge about how this will affect him in the future or if he’ll ever recover. Unlike flu, rsv and pneumonia which can all cause serious illness and or post viral complications, but the course of the illness is known, treatments are known. So again, it’s not a comparable situation.
There’s a lot made by certain types about not having the vaccine as the long term effects are not known. While being happy for their kids to catch a virus whose long term effects are also not known. It’s seem a bit hypocritical.
I mean, fair enough, don’t worry about covid if you don’t want to, but the reasons for worrying about the vaccine but not the virus don’t make much sense.