[quote LivinLaVidaLoki]@TheClaws, I read @BogRollBOGOF s comment as 2 separate points.
1 that children have been out of sports and activities for so long it's good that they are now back as the long term impacts of lack of sport and activity on children is now being talked about
2 That the biggest detriment to our children at the moment is the amount of isolation which disrupts everything in their lives
Not that covid positive kids should carry on as normal but that an alternative to isolating multiple children, multiple times when another child has tested positive, when the likelihood that they have also picked it up is quite low.
It would be interesting to know how many people identified as contacts in this way then went on to develop covid.[/quote]
I agree on your first point, but I'm a bit iffy from then onwards. To quote BOGOF's pos, specifically the part I have issues with:
"The risk of serious and long term consequences of Covid to children remains very low. As long as cases are flagged up through testing rather than being ill enough to require medical attention then there isn't a significant problem. The practical problem is policies of isolation that draw out the spread of cases rather than allowing school age pupils to naturally develop immunity and let an outbreak pass quickly within a few weeks. Vaccination of the adult population has slashed the risks in the wider community."
I interpret this as saying that isolation draws out an outbreak in the community, and it's better to allow school-age kids to continue their activities and develop immunity in a natural fashion. As the adult community is largely vaccinated, there won't be much of an issue there. (These are not my thoughts, BTW, before anyone jumps on me!)
If I'm wrong here, @BogRollBOGOF please correct me.