@TheMancunianCandidate
"It is if the contract stated 'best efforts' as the EU one does. Discussed as nauseum earlier in the year"
Gosh you all seem very sure about the legal effect of the EU contract. The contract is (i) governed by Belgian law (ii) heavily redacted (95% of the redactions were at AZ's insistence, incidentally). Perhaps you are all Belgian procurement lawyers? No, thought not.
Published legal commentary on the contract generally adopts a more nuanced position - most lawyers would, I think, accept that it is at least arguable that AZ has breached the contract.
Those words are/were clearly visible in the not very well redacted EU contract.
Spoken by quite a few EU beauracrats and European leaders.
Discussed at some length by people fully conversant in Belgian contract law
I don't make any claim to understand it any more than they do.
Oh, and even UvdL confirmed those words!
I think the most that can be said about AZ is that they fully expected the same response from the EU that they got from the UK when setting up brand new manufacturing sites had problems. That they put themselves on the line with this and that their reputation is being traduced for reasons that include lies, obfuscation, politicking and fear.