"The BBC is terrible. This whole 'schools are safe' business is shocking. The government is setting the line, then it's vox pop all the way with only people who agree with it, and journalist who can't ask proper questions."
Spot on - I have followed the science on this right from the beginning (I was reading the publications coming out in Jan last year) and I was horrified in late Feb at the "carry on as normal, but wash your hands and you'll be fine" message that was everywhere.
The schools are safe one is just one more in a long trail of things that the UK has got completely wrong, but you'd have to be tracking the real science to know it.
SAGE were utterly, utterly wrong about everything at the beginning - Vallance actually told Boris that the virus wasn't that harmful and it probably wouldn't come to the UK so nothing to worry about.
Then they got a bit more clued up, but got largely ignored when the government wanted everything to open back up again - meanwhile the BBC were giving huge amounts of time to fringe scientists like Gupta and Heneghan who insisted the epidemic was over and we all had herd immunity....
Thankfully they've shut up, but now we have the schools are safe message back, despite SAGE predicting a 0.3 to 0.7 rise in R when they open, and ONS data from September/October showing a huge increase in infections amongst children when schools reopened.
The frustrating thing here is that the truth is not THAT unpalatable. Children themselves are almost totally not at risk and their education matters - the only issues are the impact on R, and issues where one or both the parents are highly vulnerable - is it too much to ask for this to have been properly explained and people left to make their own choice?
ps Every time you hear someone say "The science has changed" - it hasn't - not really - it's just an excuse used by people to cover the mistakes made. There is nothing known today about covid that is significantly different from what was suspected last January.