[quote PuzzledObserver]@Dobbyafreeelf:
if it turns out the vaccine doesn't provide sufficiently long lasting immunity then at some point we will have to just accept it as part of life and get on with it. Yes people will die, yes the health care system will struggle, difficult decisions will have to be made but life will have to go on.
If it turns out the vaccine doesn’t provide sufficiently long lasting immunity, there will be a rolling programme of boosters, surely, rather than accepting that people will die and the health system will struggle as a permanent state of affairs?
Given that the first trial participants got their jabs in April, plus what we know from studies of immunity from infection (6 months and counting), it seems likely that vaccines give at least a year’s immunity. To be kept under review, of course.[/quote]
@PuzzledObserver and how would we manage that precisely? We have the biggest vaccine program in history and have vaccinated 15 million people in 3 months. Doing so by pulling medical professionals from other departments and many volunteering on holidays and days off and utilising the armed forces.
It isn't viable to vaccinate everybody every six months.
I agree that it is unlikely that the vaccine doesn't last for six months plus but if it turns out it doesn't life will have to go on.