I read the NEU's statement earlier after Boris' mention of the 8th March. It just came across as designed to block the reopening of schools.
"Dr Mary Bousted, joint general secretary of the National Education Union, said: 'If we come out too early, we will end up in lockdown again.'
'We all want schools to open, but like the Prime Minister we want them to open when it is safe to do so. This has to be done sustainably and safely,' she continued.
We agree with Boris Johnson that this is a balancing act. He has a duty to assess the easing of lockdown according to the progress and effects of vaccination, a reduction in cases and the various other criteria he has set out.
'But in setting out a potential date of March 8, falling once again into his characteristic and too often misplaced optimism, he is pre-empting a decision that will have to be made in mid-February at the very earliest.'
The NEU added: 'To suggest a date at this stage runs the risk of creating false hope. The Prime Minister may now be immune to the embarrassment of U-turns, but school leaders, teachers and support staff, not to mention families and students, are utterly exhausted by them.' ""
What you mean is that the Daily Mail told you that it was the unions blocking the re-opening of schools and you believed them.
The statement is clearly agreeing with Johnson that 8th March is provisional on the data and may have to be moved, and that setting a date that may have to change is not good for the mental health for teachers, parents and students.