[quote fromdownwest]@ElliFAntspoo - Basing the success of an individual purely on their renumeration output is quite a simplistic view.
I am sure the heart surgeons, pilots, bio mechanics and engineers that have not made a million pounds, but have created benefits for society would argue that their solid and robust education assisted in their success.
Also, picking arbitrary numbers out of the air without citation doesn't really expose my argument as hollow.
90% of people who succeed in life have 4 or more A Levels. See how easy that was to do![/quote]
Suggesting that academic qualification defines success in life, and that children who do not get qualifications are in sum way inferior and that as a result will lead a compromised life is ridiculous.
Then when I point out that the majority of millionaires come from what you are defining as a compromised educational environment, and that you do not need any qualifications to succeed in business, you decide to reframe your argument by saying that you don't need to be 'affluent' as you originally put it to be considered a success.
A truly remarkable U-turn from your first response. Are you in politics?
No matter what metric you choose to measure success, be that relationships, health, free time, pursuit of a passion, pursuit of financial wealth, desire to be a social media star. None of them require, or are compromised by, an uninterrupted educational study period.
Children do not need the amount of education we give them. They need a loving home, self confidence, an enthusiasm about the world around them, the ability to differentiate between right and wrong, and a basic understanding of mathematics and written language.
If you can give those to a child, the rest is irrelevant fluff. They will succeed regardless of how much the world tries to hold them back.