I think that a kind of 'opposition' should be set up to keep the government under pressure on this (I know we already have political party opposition, but I mean an opposition set up with the explicit intention of questioning restrictions decided upon.)
These restrictions are so monumental and so life-changing; they deserve forceful and vigorous scrutiny. You wouldn't have a court process where punishments were handed out without a defence for the suspect, no matter how obvious guilt is. The political process in this country depends on opposition - it's necessary to have the highest quality debate and challenge in order to hold people and decisions to account.
Why is that not happening with this? Why has a committee not been proposed to deliberately challenge government policy and represent all the other interests that are at stake here?
I'm not even saying that the government aren't making the right decisions - I really don't know about that, but I think there should be a formalised adversarial process really aimed at looking at alternative ways forward, and holding the government to account.