What I struggle with around the whole narrative of saving the NHS from being overwhelmed, is the idea it wouldn't stay that way, or once broken it would be gone forever.
If we'd let covid run wild, how long realistically would it have taken the NHS out for? A month? 2 months? Once the peak had gone, once everyone had caught it and survived or died, wouldn't the NHS have then gone back to normal?
Obviously this route would have meant a lot of people dying of covid who would have survived if they had been able to access treatment, and those are the people we have lockdown down for.
But we are on 8 months of the NHS not working properly, expecting another 3-4 months of the same. Has this been a better or worse outcome for those who need to access the NHS for non-covid reasons?
We've done this now, we don't really know how bad it would have got.
We do know the mess lockdown has made to our economy and emotional wellbeing of non-covid sufferers, plus the education of our children.
I hate how many people who haven't suffered all that much from lockdown and have been in the group to benefit from it are happy to shout selfish at those who are suffering from it and not benefiting.