Yeah cos over 6,500 Londoners are dead - largely because before the first wave, when cases were rising in London, the government did what it's doing again now.
But the numbers of dead in the first wave in other urban areas in England, per capita, were no different to London. You seem to be under the impression that what happened in London wasn't happening elsewhere in the country in March
Downplaying the situation, no official tests = no cases, reporting a very interconnected city by individual boroughs to make numbers look lower, etc etc.
Are you accusing the Gov't of falsifying the numbers?
Then when Londoners were ill and dying, they weren't admitted to hospital until it was too late to save them.
Now you seem to be accusing the health service of wilful neglect. This is massively unfair
Let's hope nowhere sees that scenario happen this time round.
London was not the only place hit by covid back in March
Meanwhile in the North, cases rise - and boom, protective restrictions are set up.
Is that wrong?
Not that all of the north is being protected. Only parts of the north east is under restrictions.
Eh? What on earth are you talking about. Greater Manchester, West Yorkshire and much of Lancashire have been under restrictions from the start of local lockdowns. That is not the north east
Not enough is being done to protect anywhere - but definitely the North isn't being given less protection than elsewhere.
In fact, north of the border as in Scotland is better protected. They're fortune enough to have Sturgeon in charge
Unless you lived in a care home in Scotland.