@ItsGoingTibiaK
I’ve seen it shared literally hundreds of times. It hardly seems to be “back door”.
It's not aimed at the general public. Many consultations aren't. It's aimed at particular groups who have the kind of specialist, detailed knowledge of vaccinations, legislation, liabilities etc to be able to provide intelligent, useful, coherent input. That's why it's not being particularly publicised to the general public.
With the best will in the world, hundreds of people writing in with their views because they watched a David Icke video and thought it made sense is not going to progress this in any useful way. Likewise for hundreds of people writing in because they read that biochemist's letter that went viral and think it's a slam-dunk case.
You've clearly copied and pasted this directly from a social media site, rather than consider the issue and write your own post about it. That's how hundreds of people will approach responding to this consultation - they'll copy and paste some boilerplate text from someone who also doesn't really understand the incredibly complicated nuances of this issue which, on what is supposed to be a meaningful consultation, will be utterly pointless.
From the consultation document:
Even though we are happy to receive comments from anyone, the purpose of this consultation exercise is to engage directly with specific stakeholders that we have identified. The UK government will be holding discussions with those stakeholders, at which it will be going into further detail about the proposals. This consultation document has been produced to support those discussions.
What that means, in practice, is that the consultees to whom this document is addressed are a specialist audience, made up of people and organisations that we would expect have a detailed knowledge of the legislative and practical context in which these proposals sit – and also of the likely impact of the measures. It is also an audience generally used to discussing draft legislation without having all of the detail explained.
That means providing in this document less detail than the general reader might like – but a level of detail that is proportionate to the exercise. We do appreciate that some people may prefer us to have undertaken a different sort of consultation exercise, even in the limited time available. This is one of the reasons why some of the provisions are time limited or have review provisions built into them. Some debates will necessarily be renewed, whatever the outcome of this consultation exercise.