so nothing at present to worry about
now that local health teams are starting to get localised and more timely data, plus the powers to take locally proportionate measures to tackle any surges I think this is a largely reasonable assessment. I'm not convinced it quite yet has a blanket application across the entire country.
Case Numbers - England at least have plateau'd for the last week or so at the overall level. There is a more mixed picture beneath this.
Of the cases added today 796 were in England, with 686 relating to a specimen date range of 13th to 16th July, and clearly a bit of a data cleanse going on as 57 further net additions between 3rd Feb and 30th June (as compared to a net addition of 9 for that date range in last Saturday's data file).
Taking that additional 686:
23 UTLAs added zero cases
36 UTLAs added just 1 case each; and a further 49 between 2 and 4 cases. That covers over 100 of the 149 UTLAs.
At the other end 19 UTLAs added 371 cases, so over 50% of the total for those four days; with the caveat that these are absolute case numbers :
Leicester - 40 cases
Blackburn - 31 cases
Kent - 28 cases
Bradford - 25 cases
Rochdale - 24 cases
Leicestershire - 22 cases
Northamptonshire - 22 cases
Luton - 20 cases
Sandwell - 20 cases
Birmingham - 19 cases
Lancashire - 19 cases
Manchester - 15 cases
Essex - 14 cases
Kirklees - 14 cases
Sheffield - 14 cases
Cumbria - 12 cases
Hertfordshire - 11 cases
Staffordshire - 11 cases
Rotherham - 10 cases
reflects that size of population should be remembered. For example Brum over 1 million residents, Blackburn & Darwen around 150,000. Kent and Essex both also over 1 million residents. Absolute case numbers can therefore be misleading.