Even if that one tweet isn't by a nurse, there are articles everywhere about this, from doctors and epidemiologists who have had it badly and continue to suffer.
Yes, I’ve come across quite a few – some below - which is why I’m continuing to be cautious. Also been noticing more articles about the so-called ‘longhaulers.’ The group who have had ‘extremely mild’ to ‘mild’ symptoms and usually ill at home, but have been unwell for some time. There’s a support group for these now on FB, I believe.
The issue on MN though – as pp note – is that the focus is on mortality rate, although tbf this is the way the daily briefings have steered things, and partly for good reason. Those who are concerned about mortality but also other possible negative outcomes are continually classed as ‘dementors’. A useful way of ‘othering’ anyone who raises these issues, so minimising their discussions. But the evidence does seem to suggest that avoiding the virus as far as possible is sensible. The Deputy Chief Medical Officer in Ireland recently highlighted this, it also seems to be under discussion in other countries but relatively downplayed here so far. It’s a difficult line to tread though, obviously it’s not useful to encourage health anxiety, which in itself is damaging, but at the same time if downplayed too much it can lead to people taking risks they might not if otherwise informed. But it’s very clear that this is, so far, an unusual illness.
I'm sure that we were hearing weeks ago from more reputable sources than FB that CV can cause permanent damage to the body. It can't be news to people following this virus.
It does seem surprising but it depends on where they are getting their information presumably, a lot of people don’t follow newspapers or news programmes…And the official announcements, at least in England, have not exactly been clear!
My entire family are medics. They feel the same way about the permanent damage Covid seems to be doing to many patients. The lung damage and long term repercussions are frightening and currently under researched.
Yes that seems clear from this reported earlier - also seen reports by cardiologists on cardiac issues, neurologists on neurological issues and so on...
It created such massive damage in those who spent more than a month in hospital that it resulted in “complete disruption of the lung architecture”, said Prof Mauro Giacca of King’s College London.
In findings that he said showed the potential for “real problems” after survival, he told the Lords science and technology committee that he had studied the autopsies of patients who died in Italy after 30 to 40 days in intensive care and discovered large amounts of the virus persisting in lungs as well as highly unusual fused cells.
“What you find in the lungs of people who have stayed with the disease for more than a month before dying is something completely different from normal pneumonia, influenza or the Sars virus,” he said. “You see massive thrombosis. There is a complete disruption of the lung architecture – in some lights you can’t even distinguish that it used to be a lung.
www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jun/15/covid-19-can-damage-lungs-victims-beyond-recognition-expert-says
IRELAND’S DEPUTY CHIEF Medical Officer, Dr Ronan Glynn, has warned that many people are suffering from prolonged side effects from Covid-19, despite being recorded as having recovered from the illness.
www.thejournal.ie/covid-19-long-term-side-effects-5120626-Jun2020/?utm_source=shortlink
nltimes.nl/2020/06/12/shocking-nearly-recovered-covid-19-health-issues-months-later
www.washingtonpost.com/health/2020/06/11/coronavirus-chronic/?arc404=true
www.glamourmagazine.co.uk/article/coronavirus-long-term-effects
www.tctmd.com/news/covid-19-related-inflammatory-syndrome-kids-needs-cardiac-follow