strangeshapedpotato
National Geographic: "Newly reported information has revived scrutiny of this possible origin for the coronavirus, which experts still call unlikely though worth investigating. .......................
"The renewed attention comes on the heels of President Joe Biden’s ordering U.S. intelligence agencies on May 26 to “redouble their efforts” to investigate the origins of the coronavirus. On May 11, Biden’s chief medical adviser, Anthony Fauci, acknowledged he’s now “not convinced” the virus developed naturally—an apparent pivot from what he told National Geographic in an interview last year.
"Also last month, more than a dozen scientists—top epidemiologists, immunologists, and biologists—wrote a letter published in the journal Science calling for a thorough investigation into two viable origin stories: natural spillover from animal to human, or an accident in which a wild laboratory sample containing SARS-CoV-2 was accidentally released. They urged that both hypotheses “be taken seriously until we have sufficient data,” writing that a proper investigation would be “transparent, objective, data-driven, inclusive of broad expertise, subject to independent oversight,” with conflicts of interest minimised, if possible."
New York Times: "“Damning” science strongly suggests that COVID-19 is a man-made monster, optimized in a lab for maximum infectivity before hitting the outside to catastrophic effect, two experts said Sunday."
I am not a scientist. I don't know either way whether it is possible that this virus could have been manufactured in a lab. What I'm saying is that there is now disagreement between various experts/scientists as to whether it is possible. But, initially, the narrative was that it was not scientifically possible for it to have been manufactured.