That's all well and good, but that still does not not make you a racist in this incidence.
You have decided that your subjective view of " the deserving" is where Good and Bad resides.
However, you are not honest or really invested in goodness to see or imagine all the possible violations perpetrated and ignored by you in order for you to be a hero/ine in your own eyes.
If the stabbed person is dead, is the bullied person next to you on the other side not worth defending? Or would that require too much effort for little clout reward than being known as the person who witnessed the last , dying breath of somebody that you " tried to save" ( whilst the attacker ran off and you didn't get any stabs)?
So by your self imposed moral arbiter, you end up not dealing in either Prevention or Cure?
How does that not make you an amoral person who has enough social know how to recognise that the amoral are not admired for their amorality.
You've " picked a side" without " picking a side" in a convoluted way, but which hides the " don't care" , to many, similarly disposed, but who FEEL that they have to say something to be seen to be good.
It's that " hierarchy" that many " progressives" adhere to as philosophy that engenders and ignores so many violations of many so that those that they have chosen as the perfect victims are the only ones that can be seen by them as victims.