I will admit, being AUDHD and not born here, it took me a really long time to understand British snark properly 😂- but I think I have got it now. I've been working at it but I am better at just being direct, so let's try that.
I stated earlier on: "I think getting your hostages back and ensuring the country that did it is completely disarmed and cannot do it again is a proportionate response".
To which you replied: Well its clear that you don’t either agree with or understand international law 🙃
Pretty much nobody is debating Israel's right to get their people back and take action to ensure Oct 7 is not repeated. It's the international consensus across Europe and from the USA and beyond..
The EU president: “I unequivocally condemn the attack carried out by Hamas terrorists against Israel… Israel has the right to defend itself against such heinous attacks.”
PM of The Netherlands: “Israel has the right to defend itself and must remove the threat of Hamas and do everything to free hostages”
UK Ambassador to the UN: "We support Israel's right to defend itself against Hamas, take back the hostages, deter further incursions, and strengthen its security for the long term.”
What there is back and forth over is whether or not Israel is going about those things in a legal way.
For example some argue that Israel is not doing enough to avoid civilian suffering, and some argue that Hamas is doing things like using hospitals for military purposes.
All that is being debated and is another matter entirely.
That is what the reports and links you sent me written by experts are talking about. They are not saying that what I said is against international law. Which was:
"I think getting your hostages back and ensuring the country that did it is completely disarmed and cannot do it again is a proportionate response".
Nothing whatever in my message refers to any specifics, the type of which you are arguing.