The 2017 version changed it to Zionists rather than Jews as a whole, whilst still keeping the simmering antisemitism and nonsense conspiracy theories which were more common in the 1300s...and calling for Jihad.
This was widely seen as a move to allow them to be seen as a resistance project and therefore more palatable to the West. It has worked in that you see people being attacked for "Stop Hamas" positions in Western cities. Whilst it is still a terrorist designated organisation.
No one serious about the ME sees Hamas as anything more than a bunch of butchering marauders.
It is all posturing for the audience - how can they determine who is a Zionist and who is not, within the State of Israel which they plan to destroy?
How do you not murder Jews predominantly if destroying a Jewish state? Use of semantics for a totally genocidal organisation.
I'm sure everyone will feel safe knowing they only want the destruction of a state and it's entire population (more than just Israeli-Jews {in their subtle terms, Zionists}, they want to kill all the protected minorities of the state of Israel - Druze, Arab Christians, Arabs etc al - as shown by their Oct 7 rehearsal - Thais, other Arabs...anyone!), an unceasing holy war (jihad), dismissal of anyone else's rights to the holy land and all this mired in typical antisemitism and conspiracy theories.
Here is The Atlantic's take - fwiw
The most relevant of the document’s 36 articles can be summarized as falling within four main themes:
The complete destruction of Israel as an essential condition for the liberation of Palestine and the establishment of a theocratic state based on Islamic law (Sharia),
The need for both unrestrained and unceasing holy war (jihad) to attain the above objective,
The deliberate disdain for, and dismissal of, any negotiated resolution or political settlement of Jewish and Muslim claims to the Holy Land, and
The reinforcement of historical anti-Semitic tropes and calumnies married to sinister conspiracy theories.