Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

If it's all about destroying terrorist targets hidden underneath civilian areas...

120 replies

Icefoot · 01/11/2023 23:33

Why would you bomb them? Surely the whole point of underground tunnels is that they're protected from attacks from above?

Don't Israel have some of the best special forces in the world, if it's all about removing military/terrorist hideouts, isn't there a way to do it without killing children, that's probably more effective too?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
Icefoot · 02/11/2023 07:30

Noicant · 02/11/2023 07:24

The problem is Gaza is densely packed, the tunnels are literally under the buildings. They would have to be able to find each entry and exit to actually be able to get in. I don’t think they have the luxury of wandering around gaza staring at buildings unimpeded. They probably have an idea of where the tunnels are but finding the entry points will be much more difficult as there hasn’t been any IDF in there since 2007.

But that's what special forces do. That's what they're for and Israel's are supposed to be the best.

OP posts:
Noicant · 02/11/2023 07:30

Noorandapples · 02/11/2023 07:26

They're clearing land to build on and clearing humans because they don't see them as people. If they didn't want to kill civilians they could easily rehouse them within their own buildings before the bombings. If hamas were hiding underneath an Israeli housing block they certainly wouldn't bomb it.

I honestly think the plan is to just get Hamas to prevent a reoccurrence of the 7th October attacks on Israel. then leave Gaza to it, no electricity or water from Israel, no work visa’s nothing. Just a border with mines on it.

All these hypotheticals aren’t real and anyway Egypt won’t open the gates to Palestinian refugees so it’s kind of moot point.

Lampzade · 02/11/2023 07:37

LolaSmiles · 02/11/2023 07:12

I think it’s because a lot people don’t agree with what our political representatives are saying - or not saying, when they don’t call for a ceasefire and pressurise all sides for negotiation and peace.

It’s like the marches against the Iraq war.

If the leaders came out and expressed concerns about need for proportionality from the beginning- then I think we would have seen less protests. Why protest when you agree with your government?
I agree with this. I think a lot of people are horrified at what's going on and equally horrified that world leaders either sat on their hands or encouraged Israel at the start. At the start, and even now, it seems like a lot of people with power are not concerned about civilian lives on either side. It's all about propping their friends and allies up, arming proxies for other power interests etc. The media and international response made the situation worse in my opinion.

Only as the IDF is emboldened, global citizens aren't falling in line with support and major global organisations have reported the scale of the bombardment and crisis, have many major global leaders started to mutter something non committal about civilians, proportionality, humanitarian needs.

If the last few decades of global conflict have shown anything it's that you can't kill terrorist ideologies with bombs. You just create the next generation of fertile minds for radicalisation.

Edited

This

Noicant · 02/11/2023 07:37

Icefoot · 02/11/2023 07:30

But that's what special forces do. That's what they're for and Israel's are supposed to be the best.

ok there are something like 300 miles of tunnels. IDF will stick out like a sore thumb, the equipment required to actually take down a tunnel has to be moved through a dense city with enemy combatants in it. Whilst you are trying to collapse a tunnel people will be shooting at you or coming up from hidey holes behind you. You also have to take engineers with you with you to prevent the whole thing coming down on YOUR head while you are moving through. The reason the bombardment is so intense is precisely because it is going to be extremely difficult.

Hypothetically, if you were attacking a country with miles and miles of tunnels with combatants inside it would you not try to destroy/damage some of them before you send your own specialists (who by the way are valuable to your army because you can only train so many at a time) to limit your own casualties?

Pinkpinkpink15 · 02/11/2023 07:39

when they don’t call for a ceasefire and pressurise all sides for negotiation and peace

A ceasefire would just enable Hamas to regroup

its not the answer & that's why it's not being called for.

Icefoot · 02/11/2023 07:40

Noicant · 02/11/2023 07:37

ok there are something like 300 miles of tunnels. IDF will stick out like a sore thumb, the equipment required to actually take down a tunnel has to be moved through a dense city with enemy combatants in it. Whilst you are trying to collapse a tunnel people will be shooting at you or coming up from hidey holes behind you. You also have to take engineers with you with you to prevent the whole thing coming down on YOUR head while you are moving through. The reason the bombardment is so intense is precisely because it is going to be extremely difficult.

Hypothetically, if you were attacking a country with miles and miles of tunnels with combatants inside it would you not try to destroy/damage some of them before you send your own specialists (who by the way are valuable to your army because you can only train so many at a time) to limit your own casualties?

I genuinely do think I'd try it before obliterating an entire civilian population.

The IDF might "stick out like a sore thumb" but Mossad wouldn't.

OP posts:
Noicant · 02/11/2023 07:46

Yes but is Mossad full of engineering and tunnel collapse specialists?

Icefoot · 02/11/2023 07:48

Noicant · 02/11/2023 07:46

Yes but is Mossad full of engineering and tunnel collapse specialists?

Really, is that a serious question?

OP posts:
Fallenangelofthenorth · 02/11/2023 07:52

Icefoot · 02/11/2023 07:40

I genuinely do think I'd try it before obliterating an entire civilian population.

The IDF might "stick out like a sore thumb" but Mossad wouldn't.

Would you really? And how much military/conflict experience do you have exactly? Perhaps you should send your CV off to IDF. Or the UN. They're crying out for experts who can offer a solution to all these global conflicts without causing civilian casualties.

notimagain · 02/11/2023 07:53

@Icefoot

But that's what special forces do. That's what they're for and Israel's are supposed to be the best.

I fear you have a mistaken idea of what most "Special Forces" actually are and what they can do.

Look at most variants around the world and they tend to be small in number, operate in small units, and are often used intelligence gathering or, if force is going to be used, it's very small scale but specialist stuff (e.g. The Iranian Embassy siege in London way back, intervening in airliner/ship hijackings etc).

They don't tend to get used in big battlefield type actions or it situations where you need hundreds soldiers, they simply don't have the numbers..

Clearing these tunnels is such a large job it's largely going to be "grunt" work, possibly proceeded by the use of bunker penetrating munitions.

Icefoot · 02/11/2023 07:56

notimagain · 02/11/2023 07:53

@Icefoot

But that's what special forces do. That's what they're for and Israel's are supposed to be the best.

I fear you have a mistaken idea of what most "Special Forces" actually are and what they can do.

Look at most variants around the world and they tend to be small in number, operate in small units, and are often used intelligence gathering or, if force is going to be used, it's very small scale but specialist stuff (e.g. The Iranian Embassy siege in London way back, intervening in airliner/ship hijackings etc).

They don't tend to get used in big battlefield type actions or it situations where you need hundreds soldiers, they simply don't have the numbers..

Clearing these tunnels is such a large job it's largely going to be "grunt" work, possibly proceeded by the use of bunker penetrating munitions.

That my point, there's no need for the "big battlefield" if they target specific points in the tunnels, if destroying the tunnels is their aim.

Regardless, it just can't be OK that they're destroying a whole population, including 100s of children. Where else has the west supported that?

OP posts:
Icefoot · 02/11/2023 07:57

Fallenangelofthenorth · 02/11/2023 07:52

Would you really? And how much military/conflict experience do you have exactly? Perhaps you should send your CV off to IDF. Or the UN. They're crying out for experts who can offer a solution to all these global conflicts without causing civilian casualties.

Are Israel really crying out for help to solve this without civilian casualties?

OP posts:
OhHelloTheres · 02/11/2023 07:59

I thought it was established yesterday that Hamas are still hiding above ground among civilians in eg refugee camps? How else would the 7 hostages they say were killed in the bombing have been there?

Reallifelurker · 02/11/2023 07:59

No, underground tunnels have some degree of protection but are NOT indestructible from above ground either.

They CAN be destroyed in whole or partially from missiles, depending the weapon of choice

I would imagine Hamas anticipated being bomber and designed them to withstand bombing as far as possible

This will target as many tunnels as possible before the Israel Defense Force goes in. It makes it that bit easier for them to operate in hostile enemy territory. Any remaining tunnels will be destroyed by on the ground troops.

I’m glad bombing refugee camps will make things a bit easier Hmm

NotSuchASmugMarried · 02/11/2023 08:01

I think the tunnels being underground hides them. It doesn't make them bombproof. Also the Israeli Army is going in on the ground as well so it can destroy them from the ground with better precision.

OhHelloTheres · 02/11/2023 08:02

Oh and @Noorandapples - if it was in Israel the IDF would be able to go in without fearing the building was booby trapped. So that's why that would be a completely different scenario.

I mean, Hamas have even booby trapped dead bodies 🤦🏻‍♀️ They found time during the massacre to booby trap homes.

keepgoingdespiteeverything · 02/11/2023 08:04

<<People don't believe or trust the Israeli Govt. They make Farage look like Ghandi This is an opinion piece but it pulls together what many people are generally thinking. They are rapidly losing public support. I suspect they don't care a bit though>*>
*
Out of curiosity, which people? The people you know or have you polled the nation? I've been in loads of different meetings recently and it's surprising how often the subject comes up. The 'people' I hear are not all on one side, they can see it from both sides.

The media has focused solely on what Israel is doing in Gaza but has mostly neglected to mention that Hamas continues to pummel Israel with rockets and most Israelis are living in lockdown and in and out of their safe rooms as rockets whistle over their heads. Nowhere is safe and just recently a terrorist stabbed a police officer in Jerusalem.

The only reason Israel is not a pile of rubble is because they have a good defence system. Gaza could have had one of those too and it also could have had a healthy economy but Hamas leaders prefer to keep the money themselves or spend it on rockets they throw at their neighbours.

Hamas has said repeatedly over and over again (for as long as they've been in power) that their goal is to keep going until Israel no longer exists. If Israel stopped tomorrow, gave in to all the demands for land this would not change. Hamas would continue to send suicide bombers and rockets and before too long probably attempt another large scale murderous invasion. Hamas wants Jerusalem and for all Jews to be dead. That's the goal.

If you lived next door to someone who constantly shot bullets through your walls, kidnapped your kids and declared they'd keep going until you were dead, chances are you'd not want to sit round a table to have a negotiation over a cup of tea. You'd want them out once and for all.

There is a great deal of misinformation and many 'buzz words' being thrown around on MN from people whose only knowledge of the conflict is what their favourite news channel has told them.

I doubt many MN posters have ever been to Israel or Gaza or know any Arabs, Israelis or Palestinians. I know quite a few and have spent a big chunk of time in both Israel and the West Bank.

We would all benefit from loosening our grip on our firmly entrenched ideas (based 100% on what the media tells us - the media that, don't forget, makes its money from stirring up rage and fear) and actually listening to what 'the other side' says.

Happyvalleyfan · 02/11/2023 08:05

Pinkpinkpink15 · 02/11/2023 07:39

when they don’t call for a ceasefire and pressurise all sides for negotiation and peace

A ceasefire would just enable Hamas to regroup

its not the answer & that's why it's not being called for.

Who is not calling for the ceasefire? The UN assembly called for a ceasefire with an overwhelming majority.
Polls are showing a majority of people across political divides in US and UK calling for a ceasefire.
Even Biden is now calling for a ‘pause’ in the conflict

NotSuchASmugMarried · 02/11/2023 08:06

Noicant · 02/11/2023 07:46

Yes but is Mossad full of engineering and tunnel collapse specialists?

I would think so. Considering it's enemy is hiding out in an extensive network of tunnels.

Noicant · 02/11/2023 08:09

Icefoot · 02/11/2023 07:48

Really, is that a serious question?

Yes given you think you can just chuck special forces in or Mossad. Israel have a specialist unit for tunnels (because it is actually a specialism).

Icefoot · 02/11/2023 08:09

Noicant · 02/11/2023 08:09

Yes given you think you can just chuck special forces in or Mossad. Israel have a specialist unit for tunnels (because it is actually a specialism).

As PP said, they've been facing an adversary known for their tunnels for decades, if they don't they've rather messed up.

OP posts:
notimagain · 02/11/2023 08:10

That my point, there's no need for the "big battlefield" if they target specific points in the tunnels, if destroying the tunnels is their aim.

Even if you just want to collapse a tunnel entrance you've got to get your SF team to that entrance...in a contested area your team isn't just going to casually walk in with a couple of back packs of High Explosives and do the job and then casually wonder out of the contested area again.

If OTOH you want to collapse the main part of a well submerged bunker/tunnel (and reports are some tunnels are hundred plus plus feet down) you're not going to do that simply by using a SF team to lay down a few kilos of explosives on the surface..you'll need lorry loads of the stuff.

Fundamentally if you need to drop tunnels/bunkers at depth you either need complete control of all the terrain above it (so it's back to a battle field style attack) or use specialist air dropped munitions....

TBH I think your view of what SF can do seems to have maybe been coloured TV/Hollywood, they aren't superman or super woman...there are lots of tasks they simply aren't suited to doing.

Noicant · 02/11/2023 08:15

Icefoot · 02/11/2023 08:09

As PP said, they've been facing an adversary known for their tunnels for decades, if they don't they've rather messed up.

They have specialists within the IDF, this is normal in any army.

Mossad are like MI6

Reallifelurker · 02/11/2023 08:16

Even if you just want to collapse an entrance you've got to get your SF team to that entrance...in a contested area your team isn't just going to casually walk in with a couple of back packs of High Explosives and do the job and then casually wonder out of the contested area again

Well you or I wouldn’t but an army could maybe could try it? I mean, isn’t this the sort of thing army’s are for??

SomeoneBurntTheToastAgain · 02/11/2023 08:17

I think it’s because Israel want the systematic ethnic cleansing of the Gaza Strip and want the Palestinian people out - either through death or mass exodus. I don’t think this is really about Hamas.