Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

Sunak and Herzog - live now on BBC

92 replies

stopitstopitnooow · 19/10/2023 11:35

Live from Israel, quoting Churchill etc.

I really rather wish we weren't taking sides in this conflict.

OP posts:
Coughingdodger · 19/10/2023 14:38

LadyBevvy · 19/10/2023 12:00

I understand why you wish we weren't taking sides OP but the fact is that taking sides is really what foreign policy is all about. And the UK has always supported Israel because it's the only democracy in that region. Obviously we've had to speak out of both sides of our mouth cos of OPEC etc. But, ya know. All countries everywhere have always done foreign policy.

Even countries that claim to be neutral in past conflicts haven't been really. e.g. Ireland took neutrality in WW2 but still kept lines of contact with Nazi germany and were among the first to send condolences on Hitler's detah. You pick a side explicitly or implicitly.

In the current ME conflict there is plenty of implicit taking sides. Hamas is using weapons bought from North Korea, Iran and Russia. Israel using weapons from US. Every conflict has a bigger shadow conflict behind it.

It's sad but that's the way it is in the world I think.

The UK did have a real opportunity to change our current foreign policy alignment in the GE of 2019, had Jeremy become PM we would now be much more aligned with Palestine and Iran I think. But the GE didn't come out that way.

I think you know very little about this topic.

For example do you know how many Irish men fought for the British Army during WW2 and how many Irish nurses worked in British field hospitals?

Coughingdodger · 19/10/2023 14:41

PenOfTentacles · 19/10/2023 12:09

Talking of picking sides, it baffles me how anyone benefiting from the freedoms and opportunities of life in the West might support Hamas rather than align themselves with the Israeli cause.

Not to hold women to a higher standard or anything but what exactly is it about Hamas, Islamic Jihad and their other allies that would make you pick that side?

Because often decent people choose to support or criticise an action based not upon how much they would like to live with the people doing it, but upon whether the action itself is appropriate or not.

flufferknutter · 19/10/2023 14:48

PenOfTentacles · 19/10/2023 12:09

Talking of picking sides, it baffles me how anyone benefiting from the freedoms and opportunities of life in the West might support Hamas rather than align themselves with the Israeli cause.

Not to hold women to a higher standard or anything but what exactly is it about Hamas, Islamic Jihad and their other allies that would make you pick that side?

Um, people who support the Palestinian civilians in Gaza are not supporting Hamas. I've only pointed this out about 12 thousand times on these boards. It's a sign of perversity not to comprehend this - or is that deliberate.

We all know that Hamas are utter monsters, but the Palestinian people deserve better than to be killed, wiped out, written off due to what their leaders are doing. They're victims as much as the Israelis who were killed and kidnapped.

PenOfTentacles · 19/10/2023 14:48

Never thought I’d have an occasion to type this but it did feel like Rishi spoke for me when he voiced support for Israel’s defensive actions within the confines of international law. I felt physical relief through my whole body. Lately it seems like so many people have forgotten why the state of Israel exists, and how tiny and alone it is, surrounded by enemies.

The alternative to Israel winning this conflict is unthinkable. I just hope and pray it happens sooner rather than later.

Churchill’s policies deliberately and needlessly starved millions of people, including children, and there are still people who revere him. Those famine victims were not launching rockets into England daily, they were no threat at all.

Coughingdodger · 19/10/2023 14:49

Yes. Because they were neutral. They didn’t officially support one side more than the other. Unlike most of the Allies Ireland was colonised rather than a coloniser. WW1 was not their war and having recently gained independence and been through a civil war they tried to officially stay out of WW2 also. But many Irish people fought or nursed on the Allied frontlines.

PenOfTentacles · 19/10/2023 14:50

flufferknutter · 19/10/2023 14:48

Um, people who support the Palestinian civilians in Gaza are not supporting Hamas. I've only pointed this out about 12 thousand times on these boards. It's a sign of perversity not to comprehend this - or is that deliberate.

We all know that Hamas are utter monsters, but the Palestinian people deserve better than to be killed, wiped out, written off due to what their leaders are doing. They're victims as much as the Israelis who were killed and kidnapped.

It’s simply not possible to support the Palestinian people without holding Hamas responsible.

Coughingdodger · 19/10/2023 14:51

I also hope Israel’s population doesn’t get drawn into something bigger but Netanyahu seems hellbent on making as many enemies as he possibly can.

EasternStandard · 19/10/2023 14:52

We join with our allies on this as should we need it each one on mn would be grateful for that allegiance in return

flufferknutter · 19/10/2023 14:52

PenOfTentacles · 19/10/2023 14:50

It’s simply not possible to support the Palestinian people without holding Hamas responsible.

So they're to be regarded as collateral damage?

flufferknutter · 19/10/2023 14:53

I'm a Christian, I'm not going to regard anyone as collateral damage.

Jupitersstorm · 19/10/2023 14:55

PenOfTentacles · 19/10/2023 14:48

Never thought I’d have an occasion to type this but it did feel like Rishi spoke for me when he voiced support for Israel’s defensive actions within the confines of international law. I felt physical relief through my whole body. Lately it seems like so many people have forgotten why the state of Israel exists, and how tiny and alone it is, surrounded by enemies.

The alternative to Israel winning this conflict is unthinkable. I just hope and pray it happens sooner rather than later.

Churchill’s policies deliberately and needlessly starved millions of people, including children, and there are still people who revere him. Those famine victims were not launching rockets into England daily, they were no threat at all.

Indeed. I thought these words were very heartwarming:
"Speaking as he arrived at the airport, Rishi Sunak said: "I'm here to express my solidarity with the Israeli people.
"You have suffered an unspeakable, horrific act of terrorism and I want you to know that the United Kingdom, and I, stand with you...."and
"He added that he knew Israel was "taking every precaution to avoid harming civilians - in contrast to the terrorists of Hamas".

Rishi Sunak - The Latest News from the UK and Around the World | Sky News

Sky News - First for Breaking News, video, headlines, analysis and top stories from business, politics, entertainment and more in the UK and worldwide.

https://news.sky.com/topic/rishi-sunak-8527

PenOfTentacles · 19/10/2023 14:57

flufferknutter · 19/10/2023 14:52

So they're to be regarded as collateral damage?

Hamas is responsible for its citizens. If anyone sees the plight of the Gazan people as collateral damage it’s Hamas.

Hamas could bring the suffering of its people to a close much sooner by returning the toddlers and grandparents and other hostages but they won’t.

JSMill · 19/10/2023 15:00

I really don't know how he can say that. Israel cut off water, energy and food to the civilian population. They have been blocking humanitarian aid. That's enough to harm civilians before you even take into account the 'collateral damage' when Israel bombs buildings it claims were hosting Hamas. Sunak is just proving what again he is a lightweight with no integrity.

EasternStandard · 19/10/2023 15:02

flufferknutter · 19/10/2023 14:53

I'm a Christian, I'm not going to regard anyone as collateral damage.

Should you need it, ie in a time of threat or war
not peace, who would you rely on to help you defend those Christian values?

Jupitersstorm · 19/10/2023 15:04

JSMill · 19/10/2023 15:00

I really don't know how he can say that. Israel cut off water, energy and food to the civilian population. They have been blocking humanitarian aid. That's enough to harm civilians before you even take into account the 'collateral damage' when Israel bombs buildings it claims were hosting Hamas. Sunak is just proving what again he is a lightweight with no integrity.

He does sound keen on opening up aid:

""The prime minister thanked Prime Minister Netanyahu for his support for the British nationals who have been taken by Hamas and both leaders agreed to work closely together to secure their freedom.

"The prime minister welcomed Prime Minister Netanyahu's announcement yesterday on opening up aid access to Gaza. He emphasised the importance of establishing sustained access to get more vital food, water, medicine and fuel into Gaza and to enable British nationals trapped there to leave."

This sounds promising and I am delighted with his stance.

PenOfTentacles · 19/10/2023 15:05

How many civilians of hostile nations do you think the UK and its allies killed before the last world war was over? It is possible to feel relief that your side wins a conflict whether it’s regional or global without downplaying the terrible price paid by civilians as ‘collateral damage’.

flufferknutter · 19/10/2023 15:06

EasternStandard · 19/10/2023 15:02

Should you need it, ie in a time of threat or war
not peace, who would you rely on to help you defend those Christian values?

Erm, nobody would actually be defending my Christian values. This country is no longer Christian and 'Christian values' are personal to the individual and between them and God. No defence is needed.

flufferknutter · 19/10/2023 15:07

PenOfTentacles · 19/10/2023 14:57

Hamas is responsible for its citizens. If anyone sees the plight of the Gazan people as collateral damage it’s Hamas.

Hamas could bring the suffering of its people to a close much sooner by returning the toddlers and grandparents and other hostages but they won’t.

You're ignoring what I said.

flufferknutter · 19/10/2023 15:08

PenOfTentacles · 19/10/2023 15:05

How many civilians of hostile nations do you think the UK and its allies killed before the last world war was over? It is possible to feel relief that your side wins a conflict whether it’s regional or global without downplaying the terrible price paid by civilians as ‘collateral damage’.

More whataboutery.

EasternStandard · 19/10/2023 15:08

flufferknutter · 19/10/2023 15:06

Erm, nobody would actually be defending my Christian values. This country is no longer Christian and 'Christian values' are personal to the individual and between them and God. No defence is needed.

Who would you rely on to defend your Western values then?

Or bluntly who do you and @MissyB1 rely on should a war happen

flufferknutter · 19/10/2023 15:08

And the damage to Gaza is constantly downplayed.

Jupitersstorm · 19/10/2023 15:09

PenOfTentacles · 19/10/2023 15:05

How many civilians of hostile nations do you think the UK and its allies killed before the last world war was over? It is possible to feel relief that your side wins a conflict whether it’s regional or global without downplaying the terrible price paid by civilians as ‘collateral damage’.

Here's the answer:

"Civilian deaths totalled 50–55 million. Military deaths from all causes totalled 21–25 million, including deaths in captivity of about 5 million prisoners of war."

Coughingdodger · 19/10/2023 15:09

EasternStandard · 19/10/2023 15:08

Who would you rely on to defend your Western values then?

Or bluntly who do you and @MissyB1 rely on should a war happen

What war would you envision happening? And how might it be precipitated?

PenOfTentacles · 19/10/2023 15:09

flufferknutter · 19/10/2023 15:07

You're ignoring what I said.

I’ve spoken a bit more about your phrase ‘collateral damage’ in a subsequent post.