chuntitude from an insensitive thicktard..
Threetimespink posted this on the Assisted Conception thread, out of the blue:
Fact: The "ideal age," physically, for a woman to have a baby is under the age of 30. "Fertility peaks from age 20 to 25 and begins to decrease at age 30," says Dr. Patricia Tiernan, MD, OB-GYN, from Bourbonnais, Illinois.
Fact: Almost all of the additional family income from sending women to work went into additional finance for buying a property resulting merely in raising overall property prices for everyone.
Fact: The likelihood of having a baby born with Down's syndrome increases with the mother's age:
?20 years - 1 in 1,500
?35 years - 1 in 350
?40 years - 1 in 100
?45 years - 1 in 30
I PM?d him/her to ask what reaction they?d wanted. This was the correspondence.
From: BagofHolly
To: threetimespink
Subject: your post on the assisted conception thread
Date: Tue 19-Oct-10 17:49:05
What made you post that? I'm interested. And what sort of a reaction would you like ideally?
From: threetimespink
To: BagofHolly
Subject: Re: your post on the assisted conception thread
Date: Tue 19-Oct-10 19:03:48
Seeing children of my many of my friends in the late 30-ties and early 40-ties born with a maltitude of medical conditions way-way above average and suffering now and for the rest of their lifes for what - just to satisfy their mums "longing for a baby" because those mums wasted prime reproduction years selfishly "making a career" or simply simply f*cking about and around.
From: BagofHolly
To: threetimespink
Subject: Re: your post on the assisted conception thread
Date: Tue 19-Oct-10 20:52:54
What 'maltitude of medical conditions' are you referring to? As far as I understand it's mainly a couple of genetic conditions which are more common in older mothers but I'm willing to be corrected. If you knew that these women would have healthy babies, would you feel differently?
These friends of yours - did they all delay motherhood because they were selfish about their careers, or 'fucking about and around'? How do you feel about women who haven't been able to have children late because of their own or their partner's medical problems?
You haven't said what sort of a reaction you wanted or what you thought your post would do, by the way.
From: threetimespink
To: BagofHolly
Subject: Re: your post on the assisted conception thread
Date: Tue 19-Oct-10 21:05:37
If I knew?
We know that there is a biological clock. You cannot just ignore statistics and pretend that there will be healthy babies!
It took a friend of mine a ill-borned baby and 3 MC's to accept that 40 is the wrong age and go for 3 adoptions instead.
I did not want reaction. If you have noticed there were no emotions in that post - just facts. And from my experience I know that many women are aware of the IVF without being aware of those "other" facts.
So, may be those facts will help some of them to recognise the forces of nature and be more careful what they really wish for, make a better informed decision and think not just for themselves.
BagofHolly
To: threetimespink
Subject: Re: your post on the assisted conception thread
Date: Tue 19-Oct-10 21:23:45
But only a very very tiny percentage of babies born to older mothers have health problems. That really is a fact. Granted it's more than for younger women but it still represents less than 1% of the total. But as I say, if you knew that older women were able to have healthy babies, would you feel the same? One of the advantages of IVF is that embryos are screened before they're returned to the uterus, so actually IVF babies tend to be healthier than naturally conceived babies from mothers of the same age.
And what about older women who use donor eggs from younger women - their biological clock is effectively reset to the age of the donor so again they're even more likely to give birth to healthy babies.
You didn't reference any of your facts, incidentally. And your stats relating to Downs are only for the total population, whereas in reality, adjustments are made for each individual woman during pregnancy, based on a number of tests including Nuchal Translucency and the Triple test, so it's very common to have younger women carrying babies with high risk factors for Down's/Trisonomy and older women who come out as low risk. I'll reference these properly if you're interested.
Adoption isn't always an option as there are far fewer babies available than there are interested potential families.
So I'm confused - is your concern the health of the babies born of assisted conception or compassion or something else?
I didn't get any further replies.

Nice, eh?